Impact of Permissive Hypoxia and Hyperoxia Avoidance on Clinical Outcomes in Septic Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Septic patients often require mechanical ventilation due to respiratory dysfunction, and effective ventilatory strategies can improve survival. The effects of the combination of permissive hypoxia and hyperoxia avoidance for managing mechanically ventilated patients are unknown. This study examines these effects on outcomes in mechanically ventilated septic patients. METHODS: In a retrospective before-and-after study, we examined adult septic patients (aged ≥18 years) requiring mechanical ventilation at a university hospital. On April 1, 2017, our mechanical ventilation policy changed from a conventional oxygenation target (SpO2: ≥96%) to more conservative targets with permissive hypoxia (SpO2: 88-92% or PaO2: 60 mmHg) and hyperoxia avoidance (reduced oxygenation for PaO2 > 110 mmHg). Patients were divided into a prechange group (April 2015 to March 2017; n = 83) and a postchange group (April 2017 to March 2019; n = 130). Data were extracted from clinical records and insurance claims. Using a multiple logistic regression model, we examined the association of the postchange group (permissive hypoxia and hyperoxia avoidance) with intensive care unit (ICU) mortality after adjusting for variables such as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and PaO2/FiO2 ratios. RESULTS: The postchange group did not have significantly lower adjusted ICU mortality (0.67, 0.33-1.43; P = 0.31) relative to the prechange group. However, there were significant intergroup differences in mechanical ventilation duration (prechange: 11.0 days, postchange: 7.0 days; P = 0.01) and ICU stay (prechange: 11.0 days, postchange: 9.0 days; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Permissive hypoxia and hyperoxia avoidance had no significant association with reduced ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated septic patients. However, this approach was significantly associated with shorter mechanical ventilation duration and ICU stay, which can improve patient turnover and ventilator access.

Postoperative tetraplegia due to conversion disorder upon emergence from general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Acute neurological deficit upon emergence from general anesthesia is a serious emergency. Conversion disorder, previously known as hysteria, is a somatoform disorder that causes neurological deficits without anatomical or physiological explanations. It is particularly rare after general anesthesia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old healthy Japanese woman presented tetraplegia with normal sensory function upon waking from general anesthesia. She was evaluated for the causes of tetraplegia. There were no abnormal findings, and her symptoms were inconsistent with any anatomical or neurological pathology. Although she could not flex her knee actively, she could maintain the passive flexed position, suggesting that her paralysis was nonorganic. The most likely diagnosis was conversion disorder. After a 12-h observation, the patient fully recovered. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with neurological deficits not correlating with neurological findings after general anesthesia, the presence of somatic disorders, such as conversion disorder, should be considered.

Relief of cardiac tamponade by a congenital partial left-sided pericardial defect in a patient with ruptured acute type A aortic dissection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissections have an extremely poor prognosis, and cardiac tamponade is a major cause of death in these patients. Here, we describe a case where congenital partial pericardial defect relieved cardiac tamponade caused by ruptured type A aortic dissection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 79-year-old woman was hospitalized after experiencing chest pains and respiratory distress. She developed out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest and was resuscitated with no sequelae 5 days before admission. Computed tomography confirmed pericardial and left pleural effusions, and type A aortic dissection was diagnosed. We began emergency ascending aortic replacement surgery under general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil and incidentally discovered a congenital partial left-sided pericardial defect that allowed drainage of the hemopericardium and relieved cardiac tamponade. The surgery was successfully performed, and the patient recovered without complications. CONCLUSIONS: We experienced an extremely rare case where a congenital partial pericardial defect relieved cardiac tamponade associated with aortic dissection and contributed to the patient's survival.

Rapid development of a spinal epidural hematoma following thoracic epidural catheter removal in an esophageal carcinoma surgical patient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of spinal epidural hematomas associated with the use of epidural catheters is relatively rare. Furthermore, it is unusual for hematoma-associated neurological symptoms to occur within 15 min of removing a catheter. Here, we report our experience with an esophageal carcinoma surgical patient who developed an epidural hematoma almost immediately after catheter removal, resulting in paralysis of his lower extremities. The patient achieved full neurological recovery following prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man was admitted with esophageal carcinoma and underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy followed by posterior mediastinal gastric tube reconstruction. During surgery, the patient was administered both general and epidural anesthesia. The epidural catheter was inserted approximately 5 cm into the epidural space at the Th6-7 level. The patient was extubated the following day in the general intensive care unit. Two days after surgery, the d-dimer level was high at 36.9 µg/mL (reference range 0-0.9 µg/mL), and we decided to administer an anticoagulant (enoxaparin sodium) to prevent thrombosis. The epidural catheter was removed 2 h prior to the scheduled administration of enoxaparin sodium. However, the patient reported a complete lack of strength in his lower extremities 15 min after catheter removal. Upon examination, the manual muscle testing score was 1 out of 5, and the patient experienced impaired touch sensation and cold sensation below Th4. An emergency magnetic resonance imaging scan was performed 2 h after catheter removal, which revealed a possible spinal epidural hematoma spreading from Th3 to Th6. Three hours after catheter removal, we began emergency surgery to evacuate the hematoma, which had spread to Th7. After surgery, the patient showed improvements in touch sensation, cold sensation, and motor function. The patient was able to walk 2 days after hematoma removal. CONCLUSIONS: It is highly unusual for a spinal epidural hematoma to develop so rapidly after the removal of an epidural catheter. This case emphasizes the need for vigilant patient monitoring, rapid diagnosis, and prompt surgery to ensure adequate neurological recovery in these patients.