Are in-patient depressives more often of the melancholic subtype? Danish University Antidepressant Group.

In contrast to out-patients, hospitalized depressed patients have been reported to respond better to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) than to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and moclobemide. This may be due to differences in the type of patients included in the trials. The hypothesis that hospitalized depressed patients have a different symptom profile to out-patients was tested by comparing 352 patients from three in-patient studies with 581 patients from three out-patient studies conducted in Denmark during the period 1980-1992. All patients had major depression and were evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Scale. The full version of the Newcastle Diagnostic Rating Scale (1965) was applied to 443 of the patients. In-patients were characterized by higher scores on the items 'depressed mood', 'suicidal impulses', 'work and interest (reduced)', 'retardation', 'distinct quality of depression', 'weight loss', 'feeling of guilt' and 'nihilistic delusions', and by lower scores on the items 'somatic complaints', 'hypochondriasis', 'psychological stressors' and 'anxiety'. In total, 76% of the in-patients and 40% of the out-patients had melancholic/endogenous depression. These findings may explain why TCAs are superior to SSRIs and moclobemide in hospitalized patients, since other data indicate that TCAs seem to be the most effective treatment for the melancholic/endogenous subtype.

A comparison of fluoxetine and imipramine in the treatment of outpatients with major depressive disorder.

A double-blind clinical trial was undertaken to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of fluoxetine compared with imipramine in the treatment of 59 outpatients suffering from major depressive disorder. The mean scores of all depression rating scales showed that the drugs had comparable efficacy. The side effect profile of imipramine was found to be mainly anticholinergic, which was not the case for fluoxetine, where it was mainly found to be gastrointestinal, such as nausea and diarrhoea. In both groups the total number of adverse events reported were the same. Fluoxetine treatment resulted in weight loss, whereas imipramine treatment resulted in a slight but significant weight increase.

Paroxetine and imipramine in the treatment of depressive patients in psychiatric practice.

A total of 151 outpatients with endogenous or mixed endogenous and reactive depression were included in a 6-week double-blind study, with extension for up to 1 year, in psychiatric practice. The results showed trends in efficacy variables and a statistically significant difference in a benefit-risk ratio in favour of paroxetine (Seroxat, Paxil) compared with imipramine. Efficacy was largely maintained in both groups during long-term treatment. The frequency and severity of side effects in paroxetine patients declined markedly from short-term to long-term treatment, whereas changes in imipramine patients were less pronounced. Significantly more imipramine patients gained weight during long-term treatment. In conclusion, paroxetine is an effective and well tolerated antidepressant, well suited for outpatients in psychiatric practice.