Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 48(3): 376-383, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38062218

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Digital health interventions are increasingly utilized as an adjunct to face-to-face counselling in the treatment of obesity. However, previous studies have shown inconsistent efficacy when digital interventions are used as stand-alone treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a mobile health behaviour change support system (mHBCSS) is effective in weight reduction and weight loss maintenance without additional counselling. Furthermore, changes in cardiometabolic risk factors were investigated. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, a mHBCSS intervention was conducted for 200 volunteers with obesity (BMI 30-40 kg/m² and age 18-65 years). The study participants were randomly assigned into two groups: immediate access to mHBCSS intervention or wait-list control with access to mHBCSS after 6 months. Anthropometric and metabolic traits were also measured. The primary outcome was weight loss from the baseline to the 6-month visit. RESULTS: Among 200 participants (88.5% women), mean BMI (SD) was 34.3 kg/m² (2.8) and age 46.5 years (9.5). The retention rate was 98.5% and 89.0% at the 6- and 12-month visits, respectively. At the 6-month visit, those with immediate access to mHBCSS had significantly greater weight loss (-2.5%, 95% CI -3.4 to -1.6, p < 0.001) compared with the wait-list control group (0.2%, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.9, p = 0.466; between groups p < 0.001). Weight loss was maintained until the 12-month time point in the mHBCSS group (-2.1%, 95% CI -3.3 to -0.9, p = 0.001). The usage of mHBCSS had no significant effect on metabolic traits. CONCLUSION: The mHBCSS as a stand-alone treatment of obesity results in weight reduction and weight loss maintenance with remarkable adherence rate. Further studies are needed to establish how to best implement the scalable and resource-efficient mHBCSS into the standard care of obesity to achieve optimal weight loss results.


Assuntos
Obesidade , Telemedicina , Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , Obesidade/terapia , Redução de Peso , Telemedicina/métodos , Saúde Digital , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde
2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 7730, 2023 05 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37173366

RESUMO

Success in long-term weight management depends partly on psychological and behavioral aspects. Understanding the links between psychological factors and eating behavior tendencies is needed to develop more effective weight management methods. This population-based cross-sectional study examined whether eating self-efficacy (ESE) is associated with cognitive restraint (CR), uncontrolled eating (UE), emotional eating (EE), and binge eating (BE). The hypothesis was that individuals with low ESE have more unfavorable eating behavior tendencies than individuals with high ESE. Participants were classified as low ESE and high ESE by the Weight-Related Self-Efficacy questionnaire (WEL) median cut-off point. Eating behavior tendencies were assessed with Three Factor Eating Questionnaire R-18 and Binge Eating Scale, and additionally, by the number of difficulties in weight management. The difficulties were low CR, high UE, high EE, and moderate or severe BE. Five hundred and thirty-two volunteers with overweight and obesity were included in the study. Participants with low ESE had lower CR (p < 0.03) and higher UE, EE, and BE (p < 0.001) than participants with high ESE. Thirty-nine percent of men with low ESE had at least two difficulties in successful weight control while this percentage was only 8% in men with high ESE. In women, the corresponding figures were 56% and 10%. The risk of low ESE was increased by high UE [OR 5.37 (95% CI 1.99-14.51)], high EE [OR 6.05 (95% CI 2.07-17.66)], or moderate or severe BE [OR 12.31 (95% CI 1.52-99.84)] in men, and by low CR [OR 5.19 (95% CI 2.22-12.18)], high UE [OR 7.20 (95% CI 2.41-19.22)], or high EE [OR 23.66 (95% CI 4.79-116.77)] in women. Low ESE was associated with unfavorable eating behavior tendencies and multiple concomitant difficulties in successful weight loss promotion. These eating behavior tendencies should be considered when counseling patients with overweight and obesity.


Assuntos
Sobrepeso , Autoeficácia , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Sobrepeso/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Comportamento Alimentar/psicologia , Obesidade/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...