Effects of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics and safety of carotegrast methyl in healthy subjects: A randomized 2 × 2 crossover study.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of the combination of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin, a potent inhibitor of organic anion transporter polypeptide, on the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety and tolerability of carotegrast methyl. METHODS: In this 2 × 2 crossover study in 20 healthy Japanese adults, 10 subjects received carotegrast methyl 960 mg and rifampicin 600 mg on day 1 and received carotegrast methyl 960 mg on day 8. The subjects in the other sequence received the same treatments but in the opposite order. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio of the Cmax and AUC0-t for carotegrast, the main active metabolite of carotegrast methyl, with/without rifampicin was calculated. If the 90% CI fell within the range of 0.80-1.25, this indicated the absence of any drug-drug interaction. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of the Cmax and AUC0-t for carotegrast with/without rifampicin were 4.78 (3.64-6.29) and 5.59 (4.60-6.79), respectively, indicating that carotegrast has a PK interaction with rifampicin. The combination with rifampicin increased the exposure of carotegrast and also that of its metabolites. The incidence of any AEs with/without rifampicin was five (25.0%) and one (5.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin significantly increased the exposure of carotegrast compared with carotegrast methyl administration alone. In this single dose study, the incidence of AEs of carotegrast methyl with rifampicin increased compared with carotegrast methyl alone, but the incidence of adverse drug reactions did not increase with combination administration.

Evaluation of the potential drug-drug interactions of carotegrast methyl with midazolam, prednisolone or atorvastatin in healthy adults.

AIMS: This study evaluated drug-drug interactions between the CYP3A4 inhibitor carotegrast methyl and the other CYP3A4 substrates, midazolam, atorvastatin and prednisolone. METHODS: A total of 88 healthy volunteers orally received carotegrast methyl 960 mg 3 times daily for 14 days. A single oral (5 mg) or intravenous (0.017 mg kg-1 ) midazolam, oral (5 mg) prednisolone or oral (10 mg) atorvastatin was administered before, with and after carotegrast methyl treatment. When the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters with coadministration with carotegrast methyl (Day 14) to those before carotegrast methyl administration was between 0.80 and 1.25, no PK interaction were deemed. RESULTS: The Cmax and AUC0-t of oral midazolam before administration of carotegrast methyl were 30.9 ± 9.8 ng mL-1 and 74.5 ± 21.9 ng h mL-1 , respectively. The geometric mean ratio of the Cmax and AUC0-t of midazolam on Day 14 to those on Day -1 was 1.86 (90% CI, 1.64-2.11) and 3.07 (90% CI, 2.81-3.35), which did not fall within the range of 0.80-1.25, suggesting that carotegrast methyl had a PK interaction with midazolam. Similar PK interactions were found for intravenous midazolam and atorvastatin, but not for prednisolone. The inhibitory effect of carotegrast methyl on CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of midazolam and atorvastatin had almost disappeared by 14 days after the end of administration. CONCLUSION: Carotegrast methyl was classified as a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor in humans. Carotegrast methyl might enhance the action of drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A4.

Appraisal of ICH E14/S7B Q&As adopted in February 2022 using thorough QT/QTc study data for α4-integrin antagonist carotegrast methyl in Japanese healthy subjects.

We investigated how a lack of placebo control affects the interpretation of results of thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study. Results of TQT study in 48 healthy Japanese subjects assessing the effects of 480 and 960 mg of carotegrast methyl (test drug) and 400 mg of moxifloxacin (positive control) on the time-matched changes in corrected QT from baseline (ΔQTcF) and the placebo-adjusted ΔQTcF (ΔΔQTcF) were analyzed with central-tendency and concentration-response analyses. In central-tendency analysis, moxifloxacin prolonged ΔQTcF and ΔΔQTcF with the largest mean values (90% confidence interval) of 12.1 ms (9.3, 14.8) and 15.4 ms (12.6, 18.1), respectively. Meanwhile, carotegrast methyl hardly altered ΔQTcF and ΔΔQTcF with the largest mean values of 0.8 ms (-2.3, 3.9) and 2.1 ms (-0.7, 4.8) for the low dose, and -0.2 ms (-3.4, 3.0) and 1.6 ms (-0.9, 4.2) for the high dose, respectively. In concentration-response analysis, moxifloxacin attained the estimated mean values for ΔQTcF and ΔΔQTcF of 11.4 ms (8.5, 14.4) and 16.7 ms (14.0, 19.4) at the mean Cmax, whereas carotegrast methyl provided those of -4.6 ms (-7.3, -1.9) and 0.7 ms (-1.4, 2.8), respectively. Thus, lack of placebo control did not influence the interpretation of TQT study with either of the analysis in line with updated E14/S7B Q&As.

Food Effect on a Single High Dose of Carotegrast Methyl, an Oral Antagonist of α4-Integrin, in Healthy Male Subjects: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Carotegrast methyl, a novel prodrug, oral antagonist of α4-integrin, is in development for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. This randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study evaluated the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as well as the safety profile after a single dose of carotegrast methyl in healthy male subjects. METHODS: Subjects were randomised to receive a single dose of carotegrast methyl (240, 480 or 960 mg) or placebo in a 6:2 ratio and received the study drug under both fed and fasted conditions separated by an 8-day washout. The pharmacokinetic profiles of carotegrast methyl and its active metabolite, carotegrast, were assessed. The pharmacodynamic profile was evaluated according to a change in the peripheral lymphocyte count. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS: Based on the area under the time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), food reduced systemic exposure to both carotegrast methyl and carotegrast by 21-57% and 5-29%, respectively. The fed-to-fasted ratio of least square means for the increase in the lymphocyte count was almost at unity in each dose, indicating no food effect on pharmacodynamics. The time ≥ 90% of maximum effect was prolonged dose dependently, suggesting that a 960 mg-dose can provide a long-lasting effect. Reported adverse events were all mild. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the reduced systemic exposure to both carotegrast methyl and carotegrast, food had no effect on the increase in lymphocyte count. A single administration of carotegrast methyl up to 960 mg was found to be safe.

AJM300, a novel oral antagonist of α4-integrin, sustains an increase in circulating lymphocytes: A randomised controlled trial in healthy male subjects.

AIMS: AJM300 is an oral antagonist of α4-integrin that reduces inflammation by blocking leucocyte trafficking. This study aimed to investigate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AJM300 in healthy male subjects. METHODS: A total of 23 subjects were randomised to receive 240 mg (n = 6), 480 mg (n = 5), 960 mg (n = 6) of AJM300 or the corresponding placebo (n = 2 per group). The study drugs were taken orally 3 times daily after each meal on the first day followed by a 4-day washout period. Thereafter, multiple-dose administration was conducted for 6 consecutive days. The pharmacokinetic parameters of AJM300 and its active metabolite (HCA2969) were assessed, and total white blood cells and the differential cell count were used to determine the pharmacodynamic effects. Adverse events (AEs) were also monitored. RESULTS: The plasma AJM300 and HCA2969 concentration-time curves displayed a triphasic pattern on Day 1 (single-day administration) and Day 10 (last day of multiple dosing), whereas the concentration of HCA2969 was much higher than that of AJM300. A significant but transient increase in lymphocyte count was observed after AJM300 dosing at all dosages tested compared with the placebo. The increase was sustained over a 24-h period only at the 960-mg dosage. In particular, a significant increase in the lymphocyte count compared to placebo (mean, 50.58%; 95% confidence intervals, 20.40-80.76) was observed at the first 960-mg dose on Day 10. Six (26.1%) subjects reported ≥1 AEs, all of which were mild and resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSION: The maximal and 24-h sustained pharmacodynamic effects were demonstrated at the 960-mg dosage after oral administration of AJM300 3 times daily for 6 days, which was also found to be safe and well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of once-monthly risedronate in osteoporosis subjects with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease: a post hoc subgroup analysis of a phase III trial in Japan.

Limited data are available on the safety and efficacy of anti-resorptive agents, particularly once-monthly bisphosphonates, for use in osteoporotic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, phase III study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-monthly risedronate (RIS-OM) 75 mg tablets in Japanese osteoporosis patients with mild-to-moderate CKD. Patients who received RIS-OM 75 mg were stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; ≥ 90, ≥ 60 to < 90, or ≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Safety endpoints were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and percent change from baseline in eGFR, serum creatinine, calcium, and phosphorus. Efficacy endpoints were percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs). In 420 patients included (age 67.7 ± 6.7 years, women 98.8%), the incidence of all AEs, gastrointestinal disorders, acute phase reaction, non-vertebral fractures, and renal and urinary disorders was not significantly different among subgroups. Interaction between subgroups and time was significant for eGFR (p = 0.010) and serum creatinine (p = 0.001) but considered to be regression to the mean and clinically insignificant. BMD significantly increased while BTMs significantly decreased from baseline with a similar degree of change among the subgroups. In conclusion, RIS-OM 75 mg showed consistent safety and efficacy in suppressing bone turnover and increasing BMD in Japanese primary osteoporosis patients with mild-to-moderate CKD. These results should, however, be interpreted with caution because the number of patients with moderate CKD was limited.

Effect of single and multiple doses of elobixibat, an ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, on chronic constipation: A randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: Elobixibat is a minimally absorbed ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor. This study aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of elobixibat in Japanese patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: This study consisted of single-dose and multiple-dose tests with a dose-escalating design. Sixty patients including females and males were randomized into five dose levels of elobixibat (2.5, 5, 10, 15 or 20 mg, n = 10 per level) and corresponding placebo (n = 2 per group). A crossover design was used to examine food effect in single-dose test. Patients received test tablets once daily for 14 days in multiple-dose test. We assessed pharmacokinetic-dose proportionality, levels of serum high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and plasma 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), food effect and sex-specific effect. Adverse events and bowel functions such as bowel movements, stool consistency and straining were also evaluated. RESULTS: Food consumption reduced systemic exposure by around 80% [e.g. least squares mean (ratio of breakfast/no breakfast) maximum plasma concentration: 0.2085 (90% confidence interval, 0.1371-0.3172) at 15 mg] while increased plasma C4 level (P < 0.001). In the multiple-dose test, elobixibat reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increased C4 whilst unaltering high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. The increased spontaneous bowel movement frequency was correlated with higher dosage and higher C4 level (R2  = 0.5929 at Week 2). Adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal symptoms, most of which were mild. CONCLUSIONS: Elobixibat should be taken before breakfast. Once-daily administration of elobixibat was found to be safe and tolerated up to 20 mg in female and male patients with chronic constipation.

Efficacy and safety of nateglinide plus sitagliptin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled by sitagliptin monotherapy: a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, long-term study.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapies of drugs with distinct mechanisms of action are emerging as ways to achieve strict glycemic control, thus preventing the onset and progression of diabetic complications in type 2 diabetes patients. A rapid-acting insulin secretagog, nateglinide, and a potent dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, meet such criteria. METHODS: A total of 121 patients inadequately controlled with sitagliptin monotherapy received 52-week combination therapy (nateglinide + sitagliptin). The primary endpoint was the safety of the therapy, and its efficacy was also evaluated. A meal tolerance test was performed 4 weeks before the start of combination therapy (week -4) and at week 24 and week 52 after the start of combination therapy. RESULTS: HbA1c levels were lower at week 52 than at week 0 [-0.42% (95% confidence interval -0.53, -0.31)]. Fasting plasma glucose levels tended to decrease from baseline (week 0) to week 52 [-4.8 mg/dl (-9.4, -0.2)]. In the meal tolerance test, postprandial plasma glucose levels and area under the curve of glucose from before to 2 h after the meal load were lower at week 24 and week 52 than at week -4. In addition, the levels of insulin and active glucagon-like peptide-1 were higher at week 52 than at week -4. Furthermore, the incidence of adverse events in combination therapy with sitagliptin was similar to those previously shown in nateglinide monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Compared with sitagliptin monotherapy, the combination therapy of nateglinide plus sitagliptin was more effective in type 2 diabetes patients at improving glycemic control while showing similar safety.