Superconductivity due to fluctuating loop currents.

Orbital magnetism and the loop currents (LCs) that accompany it have been proposed to emerge in many systems, including cuprates, iridates, and kagome superconductors. In the case of cuprates, LCs have been put forward as the driving force behind the pseudogap, strange-metal behavior, and dx2-y2-wave superconductivity. Here, we investigate whether fluctuating intra-unit-cell LCs can cause unconventional superconductivity. For odd-parity LCs, we find that they are repulsive in all pairing channels near the underlying quantum-critical point (QCP). For even-parity LCs, their fluctuations give rise to unconventional pairing, which is not amplified in the vicinity of the QCP, in sharp contrast to pairing mediated by spin-magnetic, nematic, or ferroelectric fluctuations. Applying our formalism to the cuprates, we conclude that fluctuating intra-unit-cell LCs are unlikely to yield dx2-y2-wave superconductivity. If LCs are to be relevant for the cuprates, they must break translation symmetry.

Dynamics of Two Ferromagnetic Insulators Coupled by Superconducting Spin Current.

A conventional superconductor sandwiched between two ferromagnets can maintain coherent equilibrium spin current. This spin supercurrent results from the rotation of odd-frequency spin correlations induced in the superconductor by the magnetic proximity effect. In the absence of intrinsic magnetization, the superconductor cannot maintain multiple rotations of the triplet component but instead provides a Josephson type weak link for the spin supercurrent. We determine the analog of the current-phase relation in various circumstances and show how it can be accessed in experiments on dynamic magnetization. In particular, concentrating on the magnetic hysteresis and the ferromagnetic resonance response, we show how the spin supercurrent affects the nonequilibrium dynamics of magnetization which depends on a competition between spin supercurrent mediated static exchange contribution and a dynamic spin pumping contribution. Depending on the outcome of this competition, a mode crossing in the system can either be an avoided crossing or mode locking.