Screening of the 3' two-thirds of the coding area of the apo B gene in Finnish hypercholesterolemic patients report of six new genetic variants.

Hypercholesterolemia clustering in families not explained by either low density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor mutations producing familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), or the apolipoprotein B (apo B) Arg3500-->Gln mutation with familial defective apo B (FDB), is common in the Finnish population. In search of previously unknown apo B mutations, we screened exons 26 to 29 of the apo B gene in 68 Finnish severely hypercholesterolemic (> or = 8 mmol/l) non-FH, non-FDB patients, using a single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis based screening method. Four rare and two polymorphic previously unreported DNA variations were detected. The rare variants were a three-nucleotide deletion, with the deletion of Asp2186, an A11961-->G change leading to a Thr3918-->Ala change, a T12922-->G change causing a Val4238-->Ala substitution, and a neutral T12935-->C change leading to a new RsaI cutting site. The polymorphic G12937-->C and G13569-->A changes leading to Arg4243-->Thr and Ala4454-->Thr substitutions, respectively, had minor allele frequencies of 0.03 and 0.02. None of these variants seemed to explain the hyperlipidemia in these patients. A major Finnish mutation causing severe hypercholesterolemia is unlikely to exist in the 3' two-thirds of the coding area of the apo B gene.

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: the influence of the mutation type of the low-density-lipoprotein receptor gene and PvuII polymorphism of the normal allele on serum lipid levels and response to lovastatin treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To study whether (i) the low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor gene mutation type itself or (ii) the PvuII restriction-fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) of the intact LDL-receptor gene affects serum lipid levels and their responses to lovastatin treatment in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). DESIGN: Comparison of serum lipid levels in 149 heterozygous FH patients, including 79 patients with the FH Helsinki gene and 70 patients with the FH North Karelia gene, grouped according to the PvuII RFLP status of their nonmutated LDL-receptor allele; studies of lovastatin responses in 23 FH patients with different mutation types. SUBJECTS: Molecularly defined heterozygous FH patients. INTERVENTIONS: DNA analysis by polymerase chain-reaction assay (PCR) and Southern blotting, fasting serum lipid measurements in all patients, and administration of lovastatin 40-80 mg daily to 16 FH Helsinki patients and seven FH North Karelia patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline and post-treatment serum cholesterol. LDL cholesterol, high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in serum total or LDL-cholesterol levels in FH patients with the FH Helsinki gene compared with those carrying the FH North Karelia gene. Regardless of the mutation type, patients without the PvuII site in the normal LDL-receptor gene (P--subjects) tended to have 6-8% higher serum and LDL-cholesterol levels than patients possessing this restriction site (P+ subjects). Although not statistically significant, this difference is qualitatively and quantitatively similar to that reported in three different non-FH populations. Treatment with lovastatin brought about similar hypolipidaemic responses in FH patients with either mutation type (FH Helsinki or FH North Karelia) or PvuII RFLP status (P+ or P-). CONCLUSIONS: Two LDL-receptor gene mutations with dissimilar phenotypic characteristics are associated with similar serum lipid levels and response to statin treatment. Our data also support the previous assumption that the PvuII RFLP of the LDL-receptor gene locus is associated with variation of serum cholesterol levels.

Serum ubiquinone concentrations after short- and long-term treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

Serum ubiquinone levels were studied during long- and short-term treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in 17 men with primary non-familial hypercholesterolaemia. The serum ubiquinone levels were determined after the patients had received simvastatin (20-40 mg per day) for 4.7 years, after a 4 week treatment pause and again after they had resumed treatment with lovastatin (20-40 mg per day) for 12 weeks. During the treatment pause the average serum ubiquinone levels increased by 32%; resumption of treatment caused a reduction of 25%. The changes in the levels of ubiquinone and serum total cholesterol as well as those of ubiquinone and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were closely parallel. This suggested that changes in serum ubiquinone reflected changes in cholesterol-containing serum lipoproteins which could serve as carrier vehicles for ubiquinone. After long-term simvastatin treatment and after short-term lovastatin treatment, average serum ubiquinone levels (1.16 and 1.22 mg.l-1, respectively) were similar to that observed in a group of apparently healthy middle-aged men (1.16 mg.l-1).

Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism and XbaI polymorphism of apolipoprotein B on response to lovastatin treatment in familial and non-familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Despite the well-documented efficacy of lovastatin, a wide inter-individual variation in treatment responses has been observed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible roles of apolipoprotein E (apo E) phenotype and apolipoprotein B (apo B) XbaI genotype on this variation. The apo E phenotype was determined in 232 subjects (78 cases of familial hypercholesterolaemia [FH] and 154 cases of non-familial hypercholesterolaemia [non-FH]) and the apo B XbaI genotype was determined in 211 subjects (67 cases of FH, 144 cases of non-FH). Depending on their baseline total serum cholesterol levels, these patients used a starting dose of lovastatin of either 20 or 40 mg nightly. After 6 weeks of therapy, slightly but significantly smaller reductions in LDL-cholesterol were observed in patients with the E4/3 phenotype compared with those with the E3/3 phenotype in non-FH with lovastatin 20 mg (-20 vs. -28%; P = 0.043) and in total cholesterol in FH with lovastatin 40 mg (-23 vs. -27%; P = 0.023). No significant differences were found in non-FH patients starting with lovastatin, 40 mg. After doubling of the lovastatin doses, all treatment responses became similar among apo E phenotypes. Moreover, when all patients using lovastatin 40 mg either at 6 or 12 weeks were pooled (n = 224), no differences in treatment responses were observed between the E3/2, E3/3, E4/3 and E4/4 phenotypes. The apo B XbaI genotype did not affect the hypocholesterolaemic efficacy of lovastatin in any of the patient groups. Thus our results indicate that inter-individual variation in the treatment response to lovastatin in both familial and non-familial hypercholesterolaemia is mainly due to factors other than the apo E phenotype or apo B XbaI genotype.

Lovastatin and gemfibrozil in the treatment of type 2a and type 2b hyperlipoproteinemia.

Subanalyses of previous multicenter studies comparing lovastatin and gemfibrozil were carried out to evaluate the merits of these agents in patients with different serum lipid phenotypes (type 2a and 2b hyperlipoproteinemia). Regardless of phenotype, lovastatin was more effective in lowering LDL-cholesterol, while gemfibrozil had a greater triglyceride-lowering and HDL-cholesterol-increasing effect. Patients with type 2a phenotype benefited (in terms of serum lipid pattern) more from lovastatin. In type 2b hyperlipoproteinemia, more patients taking lovastatin than gemfibrozil reached both treatment goals defined by the European Atherosclerosis Society, (LDL-cholesterol 4.0 mmol/l and triglycerides 2.3 mmol/l). In many patients these goals could not be met suggesting that multiple drug therapy may be indicated in part of the patients with type 2b hyperlipoproteinemia.

Use of polymerase chain reaction to detect heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

We used a modification of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), involving two pairs of oligonucleotide primers, to detect a mutation in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene, commonly occurring among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in Finland. This mutation, called FH-Helsinki, involves a large (about 9500 base pairs, bp) deletion in the LDL receptor gene extending from intron 15 to exon 18. For the PCR, one pair of primers was designed to cover both sides of the deletion in its immediate vicinity. In the presence of the deletion, the primers were brought close enough to each other to allow the amplification and electrophoretic detection of a 300-bp amplification product. In the absence of the deletion, no amplification occurred and this band accordingly was not visible in the gel. To render the interpretation of the results unequivocal, we designed a second pair of oligonucleotide primers. This pair of primers allowed another amplification product (158 bp) to appear in samples containing a normal exon 17, i.e., in DNA specimens from healthy subjects and FH heterozygotes with or without the FH-Helsinki deletion. The technique is easy to perform, avoids the use of radioactive reagents, and is applicable to the detection of any extensive DNA deletion.

Long-term maintenance of therapeutic response to lovastatin in patients with familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia: a 3-year follow-up.

The 3-year efficacy of lovastatin alone or in combination with colestipol was evaluated in 54 patients with type 2 hyperlipoproteinemia (22 non-familial and 32 familial hypercholesterolemic patients). A sufficient and sustained reduction in LDL cholesterol was achieved in non-familial hypercholesterolemia with lovastatin alone (average dose 74 mg/day, range 40-80 mg/d), whereas combination therapy with lovastatin 80 mg/d and colestipol (average dose 11.9 g/d, range 5-20 g/d) was required in familial hypercholesterolemia. The percentage changes from baseline at 3 years in serum LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and total triglycerides were in the lovastatin-only group -53%, +10% and -15%, respectively, and in the two-drug group -58%, +22% and -18%, respectively. A subgroup analysis in patients with non-familial hypercholesterolemia indicated that the lipid-modifying effects of lovastatin were similar in type 2A and 2B phenotypes, except for a greater triglyceride lowering effect in type 2B. The lovastatin-alone regimen was well tolerated, whereas addition of colestipol caused subjective side effects in many patients. Serious side effects or discontinuations due to therapies did not occur. Both therapies caused slight but significant increases (within normal limits) in average serum transaminase levels. After 36 months a significant rise of 1.7 kg in mean body weight was observed in the lovastatin-only group. The ophthalmological follow-up did not reveal any cataractogenic effect attributable to treatment during the 3.8-year follow-up period.

Treatment of combined hyperlipidemia with lovastatin versus gemfibrozil: a comparison study.

A subanalysis was performed on data acquired from 67 subjects having serum cholesterol levels of 6.2 mmol/l or above (greater than or equal to 240 mg/dl) and triglyceride levels of 2.25 to 4.00 mmol/l (199-354 mg/dl) (excluding patients with familial hypercholesterolemia), who were participating in a multicenter study comparing lovastatin and gemfibrozil, to evaluate the role of these agents in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia (type IIb phenotype). In stratum 1 (cholesterol measures of 62.-7.79 mmol/l [240-301 mg/dl]), patients received either lovastatin 20 mg nightly (n = 17) or gemfibrozil 600 mg twice daily (n = 8), and in stratum 2 (cholesterol levels greater than or equal to 7.8 mmol/l [greater than or equal to 302 mg/dl]), patients received either lovastatin 40 mg nightly (n = 23) or gemfibrozil 600 mg b.i.d. (n = 19) for 6 weeks. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were reduced significantly more by lovastatin than by gemfibrozil (stratum 1, -23 versus +1%, stratum 2, -34 versus -12%, respectively). A treatment goal of 4.0 mmol/l (155 mg/dl) for LDL cholesterol was achieved by 59 and 35% of patients receiving lovastatin and by 0 and 11% of patients receiving gemfibrozil in strata 1 and 2, respectively. Gemfibrozil was more effective in reducing triglyceride levels and in increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in both strata, although increases in HDL/LDL cholesterol ratios were greater with lovastatin. We conclude that, although lovastatin was more useful in normalizing LDL cholesterol, neither agent was ideal for all patients with combined hyperlipidemia. Further development of treatment regimens is called for in this group of patients.