Polydrug abuse among opioid maintenance treatment patients is related to inadequate dose of maintenance treatment medicine.

BACKGROUND: Polydrug abuse is a known problem among opioid-dependent patients receiving opioid maintenance treatment (OMT). However, improved laboratory diagnostics is required to reveal polydrug abuse in its current scope. Furthermore, there are few studies focusing on the relationship between polydrug abuse and adequacy of the dose of OMT medicine. This study aimed to evaluate the polydrug abuse among opioid-dependent patients receiving OMT with inadequate (Group IA) and adequate (Group A) doses of OMT medicine as experienced by the patients. Craving for opioids and withdrawal symptoms were evaluated as indicators of the adequacy rating. METHODS: This is a retrospective register-based study of 60 OMT patients on either methadone or sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone medication, whose polydrug abuse was studied from urine samples by means of a comprehensive high-resolution mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: Inadequate doses of the OMT medicines were associated with higher subjective withdrawal scores and craving for opioids. Six groups of abused substances (benzodiazepines, amphetamines, opioids, cannabis, new psychoactive substances, and non-prescribed psychotropic medicines) were found among OMT patients. Group IA patients showed significantly more abuse of benzodiazepines and amphetamines than the Group A patients. All the new psychoactive substances and most of the non-prescribed psychotropic medicines were detected from the Group IA patients. There was no difference in the doses of the OMT medicine between Groups IA and A patients. CONCLUSIONS: Polydrug abuse, detected by definitive laboratory methods, was widespread and more common among Group IA than Group A patients, emphasizing the requirement for individual OMT medicine dose adjustment.

Urine analysis of 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone in opioid-dependent patients by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) procedure was developed for the quantitative analysis of the new designer drug methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) in urine together with the common stimulants amphetamine, methamphetamine, and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). The procedure involved electron ionization (EI) GCMS in the selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode after liquid-liquid extraction with toluene and derivatization with heptafluorobutyric acid anhydride. All MDPV findings were confirmed by positive chemical ionization GCMS in SIM mode. Positive chemical ionization-GCMS allowed the protonated molecule M+H+ m/z 276 to be used as a target ion with 3 abundant fragments as qualifier ions. By electron ionization-GCMS, the limit of quantification (LOQ) for MDPV was 0.02 mg/L; and for amphetamine, methamphetamine, and MDMA, the LOQ was 0.05 mg/L. The method was applied to monitoring urine samples from opioid-dependent patients undergoing opioid substitution treatment. Nine of the 34 urine samples (26%) analyzed were MDPV positive by the GCMS procedure. The positive samples were obtained from 2 female and 7 male patients with a mean age of 31 years. The median (range) MDPV concentration was 0.16 mg/L (0.04-3.9 mg/L) based on the 7 samples for which a numeric value was obtained, whereas the concentration was below the LOQ but above the limit of detection in 2 samples. The method revealed amphetamine in approximately 40% of the cases, and there was no statistical difference between the MDPV-positive and MDPV-negative groups. Urine amphetamine concentrations were on average 10 times higher than those of MDPV. The opioid-dependent patients used MDPV mainly as a substitute for amphetamine, judging from the laboratory findings of this study and the information from our patients.