Treatment of malaria in north-eastern and south-eastern Nigeria: a population study of mefloquine, sulphadoxine, pyrimethamine combination (MSP) vs chloroquine (CQ).

In a population-based study involving 4019 patients in 20 peripheral health facilities in Nigeria, the outcome of presumptive malaria treatment with MSP was compared to that of CQ. The study was conducted between January 1995 and January 1996. Patients aged 6 months or more with a clinical diagnosis of malaria based on history of fever and axillary temperature > 37.5 degrees C were either treated with MSP (250 mg mefloquine, 500 mg sulphadoxine, and 25 mg pyrimethamine per tablet) or CQ (150 mg chloroquine base per tablet). The clinical cure rate was assessed by the disappearance of clinical signs and symptoms over a 7-day period. Tolerability was assessed by the incidence of adverse events (adverse drug reaction and intercurrent illness). The result shows that the clinical care rate of suspected malaria was 97.6% with MSP and 85.6% with CQ. The incidence of adverse event was 9.5% with MSP and 9.2% with CQ. The withdrawal rate was 2.0% with MSP and 5.0% with CQ; 3.5% of the patients in the CQ group withdrew due to adverse events compared to 0.47% with MSP. In conclusion it was observed that in addition to superior efficacy of MSP over CQ, fever clearance rate with MSP was comparable to that of CQ. The study also demonstrated that two tablets maximum dose of MSP is safe and effective in a large population of Nigeria malaria patients.

Efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose mefloquine-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine combination compared with chloroquine in the treatment of acute malaria infection in a population with multiple drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum.

The efficacy and tolerability of single, low-dose mefloquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (MSP) combination was compared with chloroquine (CQ) for malaria treatment in a malaria-endemic area of Nigeria with multiple drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. The two drug regimens (MSP and CQ) were tested in a 12-month prospective population study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 patients were treated presumptively, based on malaria symptoms. Group 2 patients were treated based on a parasitologic diagnosis using the World Health Organization seven-day in vivo test and extended to a 28-day follow-up period. Tolerability was assessed by the incidence and intensity of adverse events. One thousand nine hundred thirty-five patients visiting 10 health facilities, including the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, were enrolled. The study showed that the low-dose MSP was efficacious, with day 7 response rates of 95% and 91% for (presumptive) Group 1 and (in vivo) Group 2, respectively, while CQ had day 7 response rates of 82% and 66% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The low-dose MSP was significantly (P < 0.0001) more efficacious, with faster fever and parasite clearance times than CQ in this area of CQ-resistant P. falciparum malaria. Eight patients treated with CQ, including seven severe cases (RII-RIII) were successfully re-treated with MSP. Adverse events were generally more common among those treated with MSP (29%) than those treated with CQ (17%). However, the adverse events caused by both drugs were mild to moderate and self-limited. The MSP combination appears to be a good substitute for CQ, in view of multiple drug resistance, especially in areas with severe (RII-RIII) malaria.