Diagnosis and management of pericardial effusions

Pericardial effusions are a relatively common phenomenon, largely in part due to its many possible etiologies. Although a considerable amount of cases are idiopathic, careful history and physical examination will reveal the etiology in a vast majority of patients. The most effective tools, echocardiography and right heart catheterization, should be aimed not only at the diagnosis of the pericardial effusion, but also to the assessment of the severity of the pericardial effusion, since this will determine that individual patient's management. A small, asymptomatic pleural effusion of known etiology can be treated conservatively, mostly by treating the underlying cause and with careful observation for signs or symptoms of deterioration. Large effusions can be treated with closed pericardiocentesis after routine evaluation for possible etiologies. For patients presenting actual or impending tamponade, the definitive treatment is either closed or open pericardiocentesis, depending on fluid accumulation characteristics, and it should not be delayed for the administration of medical treatment (inotropes, intravenous fluids). Routine evaluation of pericardial fluid is warranted in those cases in which a clear etiology was not established prior to pericardiocentesis.

Granulocyte adherence in uremia and hemodialysis.

To evaluate granulocyte function in uremia and hemodialysis we studied granulocyte adherence, an important step in chemotaxis. Our studies demonstrate that patients with severe impairment in renal function had normal granulocyte adherence (72.1 +/- 21 vs. 72.9 +/- 14% controls) while patients with end stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis (45 +/- 30%) had significant impairment (p less than 0.001). Adherence worsened during dialysis (p less than 0.001) but returned towards the abnormal baseline values at the end of the procedure. There was a significant correlation between adherence and potassium (r=0.77; p less than 0.05) and adherence and sodium-potassium ratio (r=-0.78; p less than 0.05) before and after dialysis. Other factors such as changes in creatinine, urea nitrogen, osmolality, calcium, phosphorus or (H+) did not correlate with adherence. It is concluded that the abnormality in adherence is not the result of the basic disease process but a consequence of dialysis.