Influences of advanced age in rheumatoid arthritis: A multicentre ultrasonography cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the effects of age on clinical characteristics and outcomes in biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD)-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We analysed the cases of 234 Japanese b/tsDMARD-naïve RA patients who underwent b/tsDMARD treatment in a multicentre ultrasound prospective observational cohort. We compared the clinical characteristics at baseline and outcomes at 12 months between those aged ≥60 years and those <60 years. RESULTS: Compared to the <60-year-old group (n = 78), the ≥60-year-old group (n = 156) had higher inflammatory marker values and ultrasound combined scores, especially wrist joints, at baseline. Age at baseline positively correlated significantly with the ultrasound scores at baseline; however, age was not a significant variable by the multiple regression analysis. The patients treated with different MOAs in the ≥60-year-old group had comparable outcomes and multiple regression analysis revealed that mechanism of action (MOA) was not a significant contributor to the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients with advanced age demonstrated distinctive clinical characteristics. The MOAs were not associated with clinical outcomes and ultrasound outcomes in RA patients with advanced age.

The impact of glucocorticoid use on the outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis in a multicenter ultrasound cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Glucocorticoids are effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when used appropriately considering the balance of the risks and benefits, especially at low doses. We aimed to evaluate the response of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients having already been treated with glucocorticoids. METHODS: We reviewed RA patients treated with b/tsDMARDs in a prospective multicenter ultrasound cohort study. We compared the differences in the clinical characteristics at baseline and outcomes at 12 months between the two groups having been treated with and without glucocorticoids at baseline. The differences in the clinical characteristics and the treatments were balanced by the inverse probability weighting (IPW) with the propensity score. RESULTS: Of 307 patients with RA, 160 patients were treated with glucocorticoids at baseline. The median dose of glucocorticoids was equivalent to 5.0 mg/day of prednisolone. Significant differences were in age and concomitant methotrexate use, composite measures for the disease activity, and the ultrasound grayscale score at baseline. Patients treated with glucocorticoids had less frequent remissions defined by composite measures and ultrasound findings than those treated without glucocorticoids. These significant differences in the achievement of remissions remained robust even after adjusting differences in the clinical characteristics and the treatments between the two groups by IPW. CONCLUSION: RA patients treated with glucocorticoids had a higher disease activity at baseline and a poorer response to treatments with b/tsDMARDs than those without glucocorticoids. The states of patients requiring glucocorticoids might be associated with the poor response to the b/tsDMARDs.

Inhibition of bone erosion, determined by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) plus denosumab vs csDMARD therapy alone: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: This exploratory study compared the inhibition of bone erosion progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) plus denosumab versus csDMARD therapy alone and investigated the effects of denosumab on bone micro-architecture and other bone-related parameters using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, patients with RA undergoing treatment with a csDMARD were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue csDMARD therapy alone or to continue csDMARDs with denosumab (60-mg subcutaneous injection once every 6 months) for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the depth of bone erosion, measured by HR-pQCT, in the second and third metacarpal heads at 6 months after starting treatment. Exploratory endpoints were also evaluated, and adverse events (AEs) were monitored for safety. RESULTS: In total, 46 patients were enrolled, and 43 were included in the full analysis set (csDMARDs plus denosumab, N = 21; csDMARD therapy alone, N = 22). Most patients were female (88.4%), and the mean age was 65.3 years. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline in the depth of bone erosion, measured by HR-pQCT, in the 2-3 metacarpal heads at 6 months was - 0.57 mm (- 1.52, 0.39 mm) in the csDMARDs plus denosumab group vs - 0.22 mm (- 0.97, 0.53 mm) in the csDMARD therapy alone group (between-group difference: - 0.35 mm [- 1.00, 0.31]; P = 0.2716). Similar results were shown for the adjusted mean between-group difference in the width and volume of bone erosion of the 2-3 metacarpal heads. Significant improvements in bone micro-architecture parameters were shown. The incidence of AEs and serious AEs was similar between the csDMARDs plus denosumab and the csDMARD therapy alone groups (AEs: 52.2% vs 56.5%; serious AEs: 4.3% vs 8.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the addition of denosumab to csDMARDs did not find statistically significant improvements in bone erosion after 6 months of treatment, numerical improvements in these parameters suggest that the addition of denosumab to csDMARDs may be effective in inhibiting the progression of bone erosion and improving bone micro-architecture. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000030575. Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCTs071180018.

Long-term outcomes after discontinuing biological drugs and tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined long-term outcomes of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Ninety-seven RA patients who desired drug discontinuation after sustained remission or low disease activity for at least 48 weeks due to stable treatment with biological drugs or tofacitinib were enrolled into this study. All patients were prospectively followed until disease flare or the end of the study. Discontinued drugs (previous drugs) were reintroduced to treat flares. RESULTS: Following bDMARD/tofacitinib discontinuation (mean follow-up, 2.1 years; standard deviation, 2.0), disease flare occurred at a crude incidence rate of 0.36 per person-year. The median time to flare was 1.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-2.6), and the cumulative flare probability was estimated to be 45% at 1 year, 64% at 3 years, and 80% at 5 years. No or little radiological progression was shown in 87.1% of patients who maintained remission for 3 years. A Fine‒Gray competing risk regression analysis showed that predictive factors for a flare were longer RA duration at the start of bDMARD/tofacitinib treatment, previous failure of treatment with bDMARDs, and a shorter period of remission or low disease activity before drug discontinuation. Type of discontinued drug was not identified as a predictive factor after adjusting for other predictor variables. Restarting previous treatment regimens led to rapidly regaining disease control in 89% of flare patients within 1 month. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of bDMARD/tofacitinib may be a feasible strategy in RA patients, especially patients with early treated and longer-controlled RA. Flares are manageable in most RA patients and radiological progression is rare for at least 3 years in patients with sustained remission after bDMARD/tofacitinib discontinuation.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients With IgG4-Related Disease Complicated by Hypocomplementemia.

Background: A proportion of patients with immunogloblin G (IgG) 4-related disease (IgG4-RD) have hypocomplementemia. We aimed to identify characteristics of such patients. Methods: We analyzed the demographic and clinical data and complement levels of 85 patients with IgG4-RD. We defined hypocomplementemia as serum C3 and/or C4 levels below the lower limit of normal at diagnosis. We also compared the characteristics of patients with and without IgG4-RD. Results: Thirty-two (38%) patients had hypocomplementemia at diagnosis. Patients with hypocomplementemia had more lymph node (p < 0.01), lung (p < 0.01), and kidney (p = 0.02) involvement and a higher IgG4-RD responder index than those without (p = 0.05). Additionally, patients with hypocomplementemia had significantly higher IgG (p < 0.01), IgG4 (p < 0.01), and soluble interleukin 2-receptor (sIL-2R) (p < 0.01) levels and total IgG minus IgG4 (p < 0.01). C3 and C4 levels negatively correlated with IgG, IgG4, and sIL-2R levels, total IgG minus IgG4, and number of IgG4-RD responder index: a measure of the disease activity in IgG4-RD. Patients with hypocomplementemia at diagnosis had a significantly higher frequency of relapse (p = 0.024), as determined using the log-rank test. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the presence of hypocomplementemia was independently associated with relapse (OR, 6.842; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.684-27.79; p = 0.007). Conclusions: Patients with IgG4-RD with hypocomplementemia have a more active clinical phenotype, suggesting contributions of the complement system in the pathophysiology of IgG4-RD.

Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib in patients with RA in a real-world setting. METHODS: A total of 242 patients with RA who were treated with tofacitinib (n = 161) or baricitinib (n = 81) were enrolled. We evaluated efficacy and safety between tofacitinib and baricitinib using multivariable analyses to avoid confounding. Their clinical disease activity and AEs were evaluated for 24 weeks. RESULTS: The mean (SD) DAS28-ESR change from baseline to 24 weeks was 1.57 (1.55) (tofacitinib) and 1.46 (1.36) (baricitinib). There was no significant difference in the clinical response between the two groups (adjusted mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.35 to 0.28). The efficacy was not significantly changed in the patients without concomitant MTX use in both groups, but the concomitant MTX use showed better clinical efficacy in the cases of baricitinib treatment. In both groups, the most common AE was herpes zoster infection, and the AE rates were similar between the two groups. However, the predictive factors contributing to clinical response as revealed by a multivariable logistic analysis differed. The concomitant oral steroid use was independently associated with the achievement of DAS-low disease activity in the tofacitinib group, whereas in the baricitinib group, the number of biological and/or targeted synthetic DMARDs previously used was associated. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that tofacitinib and baricitinib had comparable continuing efficacies and safety profiles. However, there is a possibility that the influence of clinical characteristics on the treatment response differs. The comparison provides useful information to the optimal use of JAK inhibitors in real-world settings.

Effect of abatacept treatment on serum osteoclast-related biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A multicenter RA ultrasound prospective cohort in Japan.

ABSTRACT: We evaluated the effect of abatacept treatment on osteoclast-related biomarkers and explored whether the biomarkers are associated with the therapeutic response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with abatacept.We enrolled 44 RA patients treated with abatacept from a multicenter prospective ultrasound cohort study of patients who received biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. We evaluated the disease activity score (DAS) 28-CRP (C-reactive protein), musculoskeletal ultrasound scores including the total grayscale score (GS)/power Doppler (PD) score and the serum concentrations of isoform 5b of tartrate-resistant acid phosphate (TRACP-5b) and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (sRANKL) at baseline and at 3 and 6 months of treatment. "PD responder" was defined as a patient whose Δtotal PD score over 6 months was greater than the median change of that.Abatacept significantly improved DAS28-CRP as well as the total GS/PD score over 6 months. Serum TRACP-5b was significantly elevated and serum sRANKL was significantly decreased at 6 months (P < .0001 and P < .01, respectively). At 6 months, serum sRANKL was significantly decreased in the patients who achieved DAS28-CRP remission and the PD responders but not in those who did not. However, serum TRACP-5b rose regardless of the therapeutic response.Among RA patients treated with abatacept, serum sRANKL decreased in the patients with a good therapeutic response, but serum TRACP-5b elevated paradoxically regardless of the therapeutic response.

Association between serum bone biomarker levels and therapeutic response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA): a multicenter, prospective, and observational RA ultrasound cohort study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of treatment on serum bone biomarkers and explore whether serum bone biomarkers are associated with therapeutic response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with abatacept. METHODS: We enrolled 59 RA patients treated with abatacept from a multicenter, exploratory, short-term, prospective and observational ultrasound cohort study of patients who received biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. We evaluated the patients' clinical disease activity and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) scores. The serum concentrations of five bone biomarkers were evaluated (dickkopf-1 [Dkk-1], sclerostin [SOST], osteocalcin [OC], osteopontin [OPN], and osteoprotegerin [OPG]) by multiplex bead assays at baseline, 3, and 6 months: the change over 6 months was defined as the Δ value. 'Power Doppler (PD) responder' was defined as a patient whose Δtotal PD score over 6 months was greater than the median change. RESULTS: Abatacept significantly improved the clinical disease activity and MSUS score over 6 months. Serum OPG was significantly elevated at 6 months after the abatacept introduction (p = 0.016). The ΔSOST and ΔOPG were significantly greater in the PD responders versus the non-PD responders (p = 0.0041 and 0.0073, respectively). The serum Dkk-1 at baseline was significantly lower in the PD responders (n = 30) vs. the non-PD responders (n = 29) (p = 0.026). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the serum Dkk-1 at baseline (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.91, p = 0.043) was an independent predictor of PD responder status. CONCLUSION: Serum levels of bone biomarkers may be useful for predicting RA patients' therapeutic responses to abatacept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of the registry: Assessment of therapeutic responsiveness by imaging of the joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; A observational cohort study Trial registration number: UMIN000012524 Date of registration: 12/9/2013 URL of trial registry record: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000014657.

Utility of a simplified ultrasonography scoring system among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter cohort study.

ABSTRACT: We aimed to evaluate the utility of a simplified ultrasonography (US) scoring system, which is desired in daily clinical practice, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).A total of 289 Japanese patients with RA who were started on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, abatacept, tocilizumab, or Janus kinase inhibitors between June 2013 and April 2019 at one of the 15 participating rheumatology centers were reviewed. We performed US assessment of articular synovia over 22 joints among bilateral wrist and finger joints, and the 22-joint (22j)-GS and 22-joint (22j)-PD scores were evaluated as an indicator of US activity using the sum of the GS and PD scores, respectively.The top 6 most affected joints included the bilateral wrist and second/third metacarpophalangeal joints. Therefore, 6-joint (6j)-GS and -PD scores were defined as the sum of the GS and PD scores from the 6 synovial sites over the aforementioned 6 joints, respectively. Although the 22j- or 6j-US scores were significantly correlated with DAS28-ESR or -CRP scores, the correlations were weak. Conversely, 6j-US scores were significantly and strongly correlated with 22j-US scores not only at baseline but also after therapy initiation.Using a multicenter cohort data, our results indicated that a simplified US scoring system could be adequately tolerated during any disease course among patients with RA receiving biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs.

Effectiveness and safety of non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy for anti-human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Our previous study showed that the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors was attenuated in anti-human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) antibody-positive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of non-TNF inhibitors in anti-HTLV-1 antibody-positive patients with RA. METHODS: We reviewed patients with RA who received abatacept or tocilizumab as the first biologic agent. We used the data of patients treated with TNF inhibitors from our previous study to compare the effectiveness between the anti-HTLV-1 antibody-positive patients treated with TNF inhibitors and non-TNF inhibitors using the inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) method. RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were divided into anti-HTLV-1 antibody-negative and -positive patients of 332 and 27, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in the change in the clinical disease activity index between the anti-HTLV-1 antibody-positive and -negative patients. The results using the IPTW method showed a significant association between the non-TNF inhibitors treatment and a better response. None of the patients developed adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma or HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis during the 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that non-TNF inhibitors treatment is safety, and the effectiveness is not attenuated also in anti-HTLV-1 antibody-positive patients.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients with low baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire scores have a risk of functional disability progression: a post hoc analysis of a nationwide longitudinal cohort in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To determine prognostic factors for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. METHODS: We evaluated 388 biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve Japanese patients with RA with moderate to high disease activity at study entry after being treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs. These patients were treated according to a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy for one year. The Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and the HAQ-DI were assessed every three months. We also evaluated joint destruction using a modified total Sharp score at baseline and at one year. HAQ-DI progression was defined as the yearly progression of HAQ-DI >0.1. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to explore the factors predicting HAQ-DI progression at one year. RESULTS: HAQ-DI progression was observed in 18% of the patients. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed the independent variables associated with HAQ-DI progression were: DAS28-ESR >5.1 at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% con dence interval [CI] 0.13-0.74, p=0.0083); HAQ-DI score at baseline <0.5 (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.22-4.26, p=0.0102); and achievement of low disease activity at 12 weeks (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, p=0.0112). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that maintaining clinical improvement according to T2T and initiating the treatment at an early stage are important for functional improvement after one year and that patients with low baseline HAQ scores have a higher risk of HAQ disability progression.

Non-TNF inhibitor switchers versus TNF inhibitor cyclers from multicentre rheumatoid arthritis ultrasonography prospective cohort in Japan.

To compare therapeutic efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) cyclers and non-TNFi switchers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) having inadequate response to previous TNFis (TNF-IR patients) using composite measures including imaging assessment with power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS). Patients with RA who had inadequate response to one or more previous TNFi agents with moderate or higher disease activity were enrolled. The outcomes of 56 TNF-IR patients were analysed. Patients were divided into 19 TNFi cyclers and 37 non-TNFi switchers (16 abatacept [ABT] and 21 tocilizumab [TCZ] switchers). Retention ratio at 6 months was significantly higher in non-TNFi switchers than in TNFi cyclers (p < .05). Although there was no significant difference, non-TNFi switchers tended to have a larger decrease than TNFi cyclers in efficacy indicators based on clinical disease activity index and PDUS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a following independent factor associated with both EULAR good response and retention of a biologic agent: non-TNFi switch (p < .05 for both). Non-TNFi switchers were shown to have significantly higher percentage of EULAR good response and higher retention than TNFi cyclers. A non-TNFi biologic agent may hence be a preferential next-line treatment for TNF-IR patients.

Differences in musculoskeletal ultrasound findings between RS3PE syndrome and elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the differences in musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) findings to distinguish patients with remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema (RS3PE) syndrome and patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA). METHODS: We consecutively recruited patients with RS3PE syndrome (n = 7) and EORA (n = 22) who underwent pre-treatment MSUS of both hands. Synovial hypertrophy and vascularity of articular synovitis and those of tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendons and the carpal extensor tendon were evaluated by gray-scale and power Doppler, respectively on a semi-quantitative scale (0-3). The presence/absence of intra-articular synovial effusion, bone erosion, peritendinitis of the digital extensor tendon, and subcutaneous edema were noted. RESULTS: Compared to the EORA group, mild articular synovitis was observed more extensively, and the frequency of intra-articular synovial effusion was significantly higher in the RS3PE syndrome group. Severe articular synovial hypertrophy was more frequent in the EORA group compared to the RS3PE syndrome group, and bone erosion was observed in some EORA cases. Tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon was more frequent and severe in the RS3PE syndrome group compared to the EORA group. Although the frequency and severity of tenosynovitis of the carpal extensor tendon were similar in the two groups, digital extensor tendon peritendinitis was more frequent in the RS3PE syndrome group. CONCLUSION: To distinguish patients with RS3PE syndrome from those with EORA, it is important to evaluate not only intra-articular lesions but also extra-articular lesions by MSUS.

Risk stratification and clinical course of hepatitis B virus reactivation in rheumatoid arthritis patients with resolved infection: final report of a multicenter prospective observational study at Japanese Red Cross Hospital.

BACKGROUND: The prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation assumes that hepatic injury after reactivation is often rapidly progressive and can evoke fulminant hepatitis. The incidence and prognosis of reactivation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be different from those receiving organ transplantation and cancer chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical course of HBV reactivation and develop a scoring system for risk stratification in RA patients with resolved infection. METHODS: HBV DNA was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction, and patient data were collected for 4 years in RA patients with resolved HBV infection who were treated with steroids or synthetic or biologic immunosuppressive drugs. RESULTS: Among 1127 patients, HBV DNA was detected in 57 patients (1.65/100 person-years); none of the reactivated patients exhibited worsening of hepatic function. Multivariate logistical analysis revealed that age > 70 years and HB core antibody (HBcAb) positivity alone were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation. HBV DNA ≥ 2.1 log copies/mL was observed in 15 patients (0.43/100 person-years); seven patients were treated with nucleic acid analogs (NAAs), whereas the remaining eight were observed without treatment. Among reactivated cases, 15 cases changed to HBV DNA-negative status spontaneously, whereas 24 cases remained HBV DNA positive < 2.1 log copies/mL during the observation period. We designed the following scoring system: HBV reactivation risk score = 1 × (age > 70 years) + 2 × (HBcAb positivity alone) + 1 × (treatment other than methotrexate monotherapy). This revealed that patients with the highest score had an odds ratio of 13.01 for HBV reactivation, compared to those with the lowest score. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid progression and poor outcomes after HBV reactivation were not frequent in RA patients with resolved infection. Our new risk scoring system might be useful for screening and optimization of prophylactic treatment by distinguishing patients with significantly lower reactivation risk.

Prediction of organ involvement in systemic sclerosis by serum biomarkers and peripheral endothelial function.

OBJECTIVES: To identify prognostic factors among serum biomarkers and endothelial vasodilator function findings in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: This is a clinical observational study. We assessed 60 consecutive SSc patients (44 limited cutaneous-type, 16 diffuse cutaneous-type). Circulating growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), placenta growth factor (PlGF), endostatin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and pentraxin 3 (PTX3) were measured by ELISA. Peripheral endothelial function was measured by forearm blood dilatation response to brachial artery occlusion using noninvasive plethysmography (EndoPAT2000), which is associated with nitric-oxide-dependent vasodilatation and yields a reactive hyperemia index (RHI). We evaluated whether abnormalities in these values were associated with type of SSc - namely, diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) or limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) - or organ involvement including interstitial lung disease (ILD), digital ulcer (DU) and estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) by echocardiography >30 mmHg. RESULTS: SSc patients showed significantly elevated serum GDF-15, PlGF, endostatin and VEGF but not PTX3 compared with controls. GDF-15 and PlGF were high in dcSSc patients. EndoPAT-RHI was low, and incidence of RVSP >30 mmHg was high in dcSSc. Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated GDF-15 was highly predictive of dcSSc, ILD or RVSP >30 mmHg. PlGF for DU was also found. Conversely, a low EndoPAT-RHI value was predictive of the presence of dcSSc, ILD or DU. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to inclusively investigate the relationships among biomarkers, EndoPAT-RHI and organ involvement in patients with SSc. Our data suggest a complex pathological progression of SSc through fibrotic impairment and microvascular damage.

Brief Report: Attenuated Effectiveness of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors for Anti-Human T Lymphotropic Virus Type I Antibody-Positive Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for the treatment of human T lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I)-positive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an area endemic for HTLV-I infection. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 585 RA patients in whom TNF inhibitors were newly introduced as a first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in an area in southwestern Japan that is endemic for HTLV-I infection. RESULTS: Fifty patients (8.5%) were anti-HTLV-I antibody-positive. The ages of the patients in this group were significantly higher at entry compared with the ages of patients who were anti-HTLV-I antibody-negative (n = 535). The median Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was 5.21. Among the total group of patients, 82% were anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive. The persistence rate of TNF inhibitors at 24 weeks was 89%. The median DAS28-ESR was significantly decreased at 24 weeks in each group. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response rate was significantly better in the anti-HTLV-I antibody-negative patients (P = 0.0277). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that anti-HTLV-I antibody status was significantly associated with the EULAR response rate and change in the DAS28-ESR and was prominent especially in the ACPA-negative subjects. No patients developed adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) or HTLV-I-associated myelopathy (HAM) during the 24-week treatment period. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of TNF inhibitors may be attenuated in anti-HTLV-I antibody-positive patients with RA. ATL and HAM did not develop when TNF inhibitors were used for 24 weeks, but the long-term risk is not known.

Ultrasonographic Efficacy of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis From a Multicenter Rheumatoid Arthritis Ultrasound Prospective Cohort in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the variables associated with initial favorable power Doppler (PD) ultrasound (US) response induced by biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We have been prospectively investigating the course of active RA patients using US after the introduction of b/tsDMARDs in the Kyushu region of Japan since June 2013. A total of 150 patients have completed the first 6 months of observation at present and have been evaluated. US was assessed in 22 joints of bilateral hands using gray-scale and PD images on a scale from 0-3. The sum of these scores was used as the indicator of US disease activity. We defined PD remission as attaining a total PD score of 0 at 6 months and investigated the associated variables by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The total PD and gray-scale scores and the clinical composite measures significantly improved at 6 months, whereas these reductions were less in bDMARD switchers as compared with bDMARD-naive patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that short disease duration, the absence of any previous use of bDMARDs, and low total PD scores at baseline were independent predictors of PD remission at 6 months. CONCLUSION: This present prospective US cohort has for the first time shown the variables that are associated with initial PD response to b/tsDMARDs.