RESUMO
ABSTRACT Liposarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas in adults, occurring in 15 to 20% of all patients with sarcoma. Primary liposarcoma of the stomach is rare. We report a case of patient with giant gastric liposarcoma who underwent surgery after a gastrointestinal bleeding. Preoperative hystopathological diagnosis was not established, even after three biopsy attempts. We discuss differential diagnosis, genetic causes, diagnosis strategies and treatment.
RESUMO O lipossarcoma é um tipo comum de sarcomas em adultos, com incidência entre 15 e 20% entre os sarcomas. No entanto, o acometimento do estômago é raro. Relatamos um caso de um lipossarcoma primário gástrico gigante com apresentação clínica de hemorragia digestiva. Foi submetido a tratamento cirúrgico sem diagnóstico definitivo, apesar de três biópsias realizadas. Revisamos diagnósticos diferenciais, influência genética e estratégias diagnósticas e terapêuticas.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Lipossarcoma/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Biópsia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Lipossarcoma/cirurgia , Lipossarcoma/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Liposarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas in adults, occurring in 15 to 20% of all patients with sarcoma. Primary liposarcoma of the stomach is rare. We report a case of patient with giant gastric liposarcoma who underwent surgery after a gastrointestinal bleeding. Preoperative hystopathological diagnosis was not established, even after three biopsy attempts. We discuss differential diagnosis, genetic causes, diagnosis strategies and treatment. RESUMO O lipossarcoma é um tipo comum de sarcomas em adultos, com incidência entre 15 e 20% entre os sarcomas. No entanto, o acometimento do estômago é raro. Relatamos um caso de um lipossarcoma primário gástrico gigante com apresentação clínica de hemorragia digestiva. Foi submetido a tratamento cirúrgico sem diagnóstico definitivo, apesar de três biópsias realizadas. Revisamos diagnósticos diferenciais, influência genética e estratégias diagnósticas e terapêuticas.
Assuntos
Lipossarcoma/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Idoso , Biópsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Lipossarcoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Lipossarcoma/cirurgia , Masculino , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis with bowel involvement is one of the most aggressive forms of endometriosis. Nowadays, robotic technology and telemanipulation systems represent the latest developments in minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this study is to present our preliminary results and evaluate the feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resection for severe endometriosis. METHODS: Between September 2009 and December 2011, 10 women with colorectal endometriosis underwent surgery with the da Vinci robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). We evaluated the following parameters: short-term complications, clinical outcomes and long-term follow-up, pain relief recurrence rate, and fertility outcomes. RESULTS: Extensive ureterolysis was required in 8 women (80%). Ovarian cystectomy with removal of the cystic wall was performed in 7 women (70%). Torus resection was performed in all women, with unilateral and bilateral uterosacral ligament resection in 1 woman (10%) and 8 women (80%), respectively. In addition to segmental colorectal resection in all cases, partial vaginal resection was necessary in 2 women (20%). An appendectomy was performed in 2 patients (20%). The mean operative time with the robot was 157 minutes (range, 90-190 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 3 days. Six patients had infertility before surgery, with a mean infertility time of 2 years. After a 12-month follow-up period, 4 women (67%) conceived naturally and 2 (33%) underwent in vitro fertilization. CONCLUSION: We show that robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis is feasible, effective, and safe.
Assuntos
Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Endometriose/cirurgia , Doenças Retais/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Adulto , Doenças do Colo/patologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Retais/patologia , Robótica , Ureter/cirurgiaRESUMO
The aim of this study was to report our experience in robotic-assisted surgery of hiatus hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease in a large series of complex cases. From March 2009 until July 2010, 21 patients were operated due to hiatus hernia or reflux disease using robotic-assisted surgery at Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. All patients were selected for the robotic approach because of the complexity of the cases (associated co-morbidity) such as: previous major upper abdominal surgery in 6 patients, hiatus hernia with paraesophageal involvement in 8 patients, obesity with a body mass index of over 29 kg/m(2) in 8 patients, and previous hiatus hernioplasty in 3 patients. Optimal trocar positioning, operating and setup times, conversion rate, intraoperative complications, and perioperative morbidity and mortality rate were analyzed. The mean operating time was reduced from 316 to 195 min after five procedures and the setup time from 20 to 10 min after five procedures. There were no conversions in this group of patients and also no complication or need of blood transfusion. Robotic-assisted fundoplication is feasible, safe and effective for treating hiatus hernias and gastroesophageal reflux disease, especially in complex cases because improved dissection in the esophageal hiatus region compensates for long operating times. Disadvantages are the high costs, the time to master the setup/system, and the necessity of exact trocar positioning.
RESUMO
In the last few years, robotic surgery has started to take its place in pancreatic surgery. Robotic surgery provides advantages such as enhanced visualisation and freedom of dissection within a confined space and also allows economical surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and short-term outcome of the robotic approach using the da Vinci robotic system in pancreatic/peripancreatic tumors other than pancreatic carcinomas. Fifteen patients with eight intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, four pancreatic neuroendocrine and three periampulary tumors were included in this initial series. Seven left pancreatectomies, five pancreatoduodenectomies and two total pancreatectomies were performed at Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. The mean operating room time for all the procedures was 503 min (315-775 min). Blood transfusion was necessary in one patient (3 units). The mean length of stay for all patients was 16 days (5-52 days). Large series of robotic pancreatic surgery should be described and the decision as to its routine use will come from cumulative experience. This surgical system allows difficult procedures to be performed more easily, effectively and precisely.