Protecting healthcare workers and patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of baseline and follow-up infection prevention and control needs in Nigerian military healthcare facilities delivering HIV services.

BACKGROUND: Protecting the HIV health workforce is critical for continuity of services for people living with HIV, particularly during a pandemic. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, the Nigerian Ministry of Defence, in partnership with the US Military HIV Research Program, took steps to improve infection prevention and control (IPC) practices among staff working in select PEPFAR-supported Nigerian military health facilities. METHODS: We identified a set of IPC activities a priori for implementation at four Nigerian military hospitals in HIV and related departments in early 2021, including continuous medical masking, physical distancing, placement of additional hand washing stations and hand sanitizers throughout facilities, and training. We fine-tuned planned intervention activities through a baseline needs assessment conducted in December 2020 that covered eight IPC components: 'IPC program structure, funding and leadership engagement'; 'IPC policies, guidelines and standard operating procedures (SOPs)'; 'infrastructure'; 'triage and screening'; 'training, knowledge and practice'; 'personal protective equipment (PPE) materials, availability and adequacy'; 'biosafety and waste management'; and 'monitoring and remediation' prior to implementation. Baseline results were compared with those of a follow up assessment administered in August 2021, following intervention implementation. RESULTS: IPC readiness remained high at both baseline and follow-up assessments for 'IPC guidelines, policies, and SOPs' (96.7%). The components 'infrastructure' and 'monitoring and remediation', which needed improvement at baseline, saw modest improvements at follow-up, by 2% and 7.5%, respectively. At follow-up, declines from high scoring at baseline were seen in 'IPC program structure, funding and leadership engagement', 'training, knowledge and practice', and 'biosafety and waste management'. 'PPE materials availability and adequacy' improved to 88.9% at follow-up. Although unidirectional client flow was newly implemented, the score for 'triage and screening' did not change from baseline to follow-up (73%). CONCLUSION: Variability in IPC component readiness and across facilities highlights the importance of building resilience and employing a quality improvement approach to IPC that includes regular monitoring, re-assessment and re-training at set intervals. Results can be used to encourage solutions-oriented dialogue between staff and leadership, determine needs and implement action plans to protect staff and people with HIV.

Effect of multi-month antiretroviral dispensing on HIV clinic attendance at 68 Nigerian Army Reference Hospital, Yaba, Nigeria.

Background: Multi-month dispensing (MMD) of antiretroviral therapy has demonstrated benefits for HIV patients and health service delivery systems, including reduced frequency of hospital visits and improved retention. We evaluated the effect of 6-monthly dispensing (MMD6) on patient clinic attendance at a single military facility in the one-year pre- and post-policy change.Methods: This was a descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study, exploring the relationship between MMD6 and clinic attendance numbers. We reviewed aggregate clinic attendance records for clients on ART and documented monthly trends in clinic attendance numbers, number of clients current on ART, and amount of ART dispensed.Results: In the pre-MMD6 group, 4 150 patients were included, and 4 190 in the post-MMD6 group. Clinic attendance was 30 407 visits (16 111 pre-MMD6 and 14 296 post-MMD6). An overall mean increase of 326.58 ± 861.81 (95% CI = -874.15 ± 220.98) drugs were dispensed per month; t(11) = -1.31, p = 0.22; mean monthly clinic attendance declined from 1342.8 ± 220.10 visits pre-MMD6 to 1191.33 ± 309.10 post-MMD6 with t(11) = 1.601, p = 0.14, but was not statistically significant.Conclusion: Six-monthly dispensing can be an important tool to reduce HIV clinic volumes and improve antiretroviral access. It is particularly important for care continuity in military facilities where service members may be deployed or transferred to other bases along with their dependents.

The Nigerian Military Public Health Response to COVID-19: A 14-Month Appraisal.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality since its emergence in December 2019. In Nigeria, the government inaugurated the Presidential Task Force on COVID-19 to coordinate resources while the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control led the public health response. The Nigeria Ministry of Defence Health Implementation Programme (MODHIP), in partnership with the US Army Medical Research Directorate - Africa/Nigeria, responded immediately to the pandemic by establishing a public health emergency operations center to coordinate the military response in support of national efforts. MODHIP has 5 functional units and 6 pillars that coordinate testing, surveillance, case management, risk communication, logistics, research, and infection prevention and control. It developed an incident action plan and each pillar had its own terms of reference to guide specific response activities while preventing duplication of efforts within the military and the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control. In addition, awareness and sensitization sessions were conducted on preventive practices for COVID-19 and infrastructure was provided for hand hygiene and screening at all military facilities. Military laboratories were configured for SARS-CoV-2 testing while selected military health facilities were equipped and designated as COVID-19 treatment centers. Research proposals aimed at better understanding the disease and controlling it were also developed. The traditional combat role of the military was redirected to complement this public health emergency response. In this article, we highlight gaps, opportunities, and lessons to improve military participation in public health emergency response in the future. More funding and multisectoral collaboration with civilian institutions are key to strengthening military public health emergency preparedness and response capabilities.

Reference intervals of common clinical biochemistry analytes in young Nigerian adults.

BACKGROUND: Reference intervals are assessment tools for interpretation of clinical test results. These intervals describe the dispersion of test parameter values of apparently healthy persons in defined populations as health status indicators. Using reference intervals obtained and validated in populations outside the geographical region of derivation for medical decision-making may impact negatively on clinical interpretation and patient management. Many countries have established their reference values, current studies on these data for Nigeria are however scarce. Determination of clinical biochemistry reference intervals for young Nigerian adults which is of particular importance in routine clinical management and conduct of clinical trials in response to existing and emerging diseases will add significantly to the existing body of knowledge. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to establish reference intervals for 24biochemistry analytes among Nigerians aged 18 to 26 years. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study among 7,797 consenting male and female military applicants aged 18 to 26 years from 37 States of Nigeria. It was a total study among volunteers for military service. Blood samples were collected and subjected to serological testing for HIV-1 and 2, hepatitis-B, malaria, pregnancy and haematuria to restrict our study population to apparently healthy participants. Biochemical assays were performed on 6,169 participant samples that met the inclusion criteria. Generated data was entered into MS Excel® and exported into SPSS® software version 16 for analysis. Statistical tools used were frequencies, median, mid 95th percentile range with 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles as limits. Reference intervals were estimated using nonparametric methods. No intergender statistical comparison was made. RESULTS: Complete records were obtained for 6,169 eligible participants. Median values and associated reference intervals were similar in both genders. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study will help in clinical decision-making and play a significant role in supporting the current global rapid expansion of clinical trials in response to the urgent need for preventive and therapeutic solutions to existing and emerging diseases.