Awareness of the effects of small-scale cassava mill effluent on the environment in Ika North East Local Government Area, Delta State, Nigeria.

The threat of environmental pollution in Nigeria, particularly in the Niger Delta region, cannot be solely ascribed to oil spillages; rather, it also encompasses the discharge of cassava mill effluent (CME), frequently disposed off in an unregulated manner. Existing studies on CME have focused on its potential environmental consequences on soil characteristics, microbial populations, and heavy metal levels. There is limited study on the awareness of the impact of CME on the environment. Thus, this study contributes to the literature on CME by examining the awareness of its effect on the environment in Ika North East Local Government Area of Delta State, Nigeria. The study used interviews, observation, and questionnaires administered to 399 respondents for data collection. A Student t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation were employed to analyse the data in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results revealed limited awareness, with 51.3% unaware of CME's environmental impact. Slight, moderate, and extreme awareness were reported by 7.5%, 17.3%, and 23.8%, respectively. Gender's influence on awareness was insignificant, but age showed a significant influence (p < 0.05), while education, occupation, and income correlated positively with awareness (p < 0.001). The source of information significantly predicted awareness (r = -0.727, p < 0.001). It indicates that gender's influence on awareness might depend on education levels. Socio-economic factors are strongly related to awareness. Reliable information sources are vital for understanding CME's environmental impact. The study underscores the need for enhanced environmental education and reliable information dissemination to promote sustainable practices.

Factors That Determine Multiple Primary Cancers in the Adult Population in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide and a leading cause of death in the United States. Multiple primary cancers mean that an individual has more than one cancer in the same or a different organ but does not include instances of metastasis of initial primary cancer. Several factors such as genetics, for example, BRCA1 gene mutations, may predict multiple primary cancers. Factors such as the age at first cancer diagnosis may determine the outcome of multiple primary cancers. This study aims to determine factors that determine multiple primary cancers among the adult population in the United States.  Methods: This study uses data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2021 dataset. The study included all individuals recently diagnosed with cancer (sample size = 9806). All age groups were included in this study. Measures included the outcome variable number of cancers and a major independent variable: age at first cancer diagnosis. Covariates included race, sex, smoking status, and cancer treatment. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted using a statistical analysis system. It was hypothesized that individuals with age at first diagnosis of cancer at a younger age have higher odds of having multiple primary cancers as compared to individuals diagnosed at an older age.  Results: The age group of 50-64 years had the highest percentage of only one cancer type (35.87%) and of two or more cancers (35.46%). A majority of females had two or more cancers (53.52%) as compared to males (47.48%). The majority of participants with only one cancer type (80.59%) and two or more cancers (88.61%) were of White non-Hispanic ethnicity. At the multivariate level, the age group under 18 years had 9.4% higher odds of having two or more cancers compared to the age group of 18-29 years (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.094, 95%CI=1.026-1.166; p-value=0.0057). The age group 65 years and above had 11.6% lower odds of having multiple primary cancers as compared to the age group of 18-29 years (AOR=0.884; 95%CI=0.859-0910; p-value=<0.0001). The Black non-Hispanic group had 73.8% lower odds of having multiple primary cancers as compared to White non-Hispanic respondents (AOR= 0.262; 95%CI = 0.228-0.301; p-value = <0.0001). Hispanic respondents had 59.8% lower odds of having two or more cancers as compared to the White non-Hispanic group (AOR= 0.402; 95%CI=0.390-0.413; p-value=<0.0001). Current smokers had 9.7% higher odds of having multiple cancers as compared to individuals who never smoked (AOR = 1.097; 95%CI=1.066-1.129; p-value=<0.0001). Former smokers had 24.2% higher odds of having multiple cancers as compared to individuals who never smoked (AOR=1.242; 95%CI=1.224-1.261; p-value=<0.0001). Individuals who were currently on treatment had 2.676 higher odds of having two or more cancers as compared to individuals not on treatment (AOR=2.676; 95%CI=2.629-2.724; p-value=<0.0001).  Conclusion: Multiple primary cancers have been on the increase recently following advancements in anticancer therapy and cancer screening and diagnosis technology. It is important that studies that aim to demonstrate risk factors and predictors of multiple primary cancers such as the age at first diagnosis, smoking status, and cancer treatment are encouraged among public health specialists.

Racial Disparities In In-Hospital Mortality of Children and Adolescents Under 20 Years With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, racial disparities in health outcomes continue to be a major problem with far-reaching effects on equity in healthcare and public health. Children and teenagers with type 1 diabetes are a disadvantaged demographic that has particular difficulties in managing their condition and getting access to healthcare. Despite improvements in the treatment of diabetes, little study has examined how much racial disparities in in-hospital mortality affect this particular demographic. By examining racial differences in in-hospital mortality rates among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the United States, this study seeks to close this gap. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) for 2012. The KID is a nationally representative sample of pediatric discharges from US hospitals. A total of 20,107 patients who were admitted with type 1 diabetes were included in this study. The primary outcome was the patient's in-hospital mortality status. The primary predictor variable was the race of the patient. Six potential confounders were chosen based on previous literature: age, sex, hospital location, obesity, weight loss, electrolyte disorders status, and median household income. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were done. Multivariate analysis was conducted while controlling for potential confounders. Odd ratios with a 95% confidence interval and probability value were reported. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) version 9.4 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 20,107 patients were included in this study. Of the patients included, 78.6%, 5.3%, 5.9%, and 10.2% were of age groups <4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15-18, respectively. Among the patients, 64.3% were female. Whites stood at 54.3%, while Hispanic, Black, and other races accounted for 17.2%, 21.8%, and 6.7% respectively. After adjusting for all other variables, children, and young adults of Asian and Pacific Islanders (OR=1.948; 95% CI 1.015,3.738) had 94% higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to their White counterparts. Children and young adults aged 5-9 (OR=0.29; 95% CI 0.13,0.649) had 71% lower odds of in-hospital mortality compared to those aged 4 or under. Those aged 10-14 (OR=0.155; 95% CI 0.077,0.313) had 85% lower odds of in-hospital mortality compared to those aged 4 or under, while those aged 15-19 (OR=0.172; 95% CI 0.100,0.296) had 83% lower odds of in-hospital mortality compared to those aged 4 or under. Children and young adults who had weight loss (OR=4.474; 95% CI 2.557,7.826) had almost five times higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to those without weight loss, while children and young adults who had electrolyte disorders (OR=5.131; 95% CI 3.429,7.679) had five times higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to those without electrolyte disorders. CONCLUSION: The results show young adults of Asian and Pacific Islanders have higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to their White counterparts and this study highlights the urgent need for focused measures designed to lessen these inequalities and enhance health equity. The implementation of culturally sensitive healthcare practices, addressing social determinants of health, and enhancing access to high-quality diabetes care should all be priorities.

Nativity Status Predicts Tobacco Use: A Comparative Analysis of US-Born and Foreign-Born Adults From the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Introduction Tobacco smoking remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally and in the United States (USA). We hypothesize that US-born naturals have higher odds of tobacco smoking compared to their foreign-born counterparts, and our study aims to assess the relationship between nativity status and odds of tobacco smoking using a nationally representative sample. Methods We utilized the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5 Cycle 1 (2017) and Cycle 2 (2018) for this study. Our main outcome variable was smoking status divided as ever smoker and never smoker. The main predictor was US birth status. We controlled for sociodemographic characteristics such as age, race, gender, educational status, and marital status. We performed weighted descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis with chi-square for our variables. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression was used to ascertain the odds of our outcome given our predictor. Significance was set at 95% confidence, and the alpha level was set to 0.05. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Results Our final sample consisted of 5,677 individuals (weighted: 429,613,693). Of our sample, 36.89% were ever smokers, females were 50.73%, and the majority (57.90%) were high school graduates. In terms of nativity status, those born in the USA were 85.65%, while the non-US-born population was 14.35%. After adjusting for confounders, we found that non-US-born respondents had 42% lower odds of being ever smokers compared to their US-born counterparts (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.576; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.388-0.854; P = 0.0062). Females were 24% less likely to be ever smokers compared to males (AOR = 0.758; 95% CI = 0.644-0.893; P = 0.0010). Having a bachelor's degree or a graduate degree was associated with 42% and 53% lower odds of being ever smokers compared to high school graduates (AOR = 0.583; 95% CI = 0.474-0.717; P < 0.0001) (AOR = 0.471; 95% CI = 0.377-0.588; P < 0.0001). Whites had 97% higher odds of being ever smokers compared to Hispanics (AOR = 1.977; 95% CI = 1.459-2.679; P < 0.0001). Conclusion Our finding of lower odds of tobacco use among foreign-born nationals compared to US-born nationals is consistent with previous studies and suggests the need for equity in tobacco use prevention between the two populations assessed in our study. This is poised to improve overall tobacco use burden, morbidity, and mortality.

The Course of SARS-COV2 Infection Was Not Severe in a Crohn's Patient Who Administered Maintenance Anti-TNF Therapy Overlapping the Early Pre-Symptomatic Period of Infection.

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) population, which may require treatment with immunosuppressive medications, may be uniquely vulnerable to COVID-19 infection. In fact, there is some evidence these medications may inhibit the cytokine storm that is theorized to cause a rapid decline seen in COVID-19. In addition, the digestive symptoms of COVID-19 can be difficult to distinguish from the activation of IBD. We present an interesting case of a Crohn's patient inadvertently administering anti-cytokine therapy during the pre-symptomatic period of COVID-19 infection. Immune suppression during early infection with SARS-COV2 risks a poor immune response to the virus and could theoretically result in a more severe course of infection.

Role of local town planning authorities in building collapse in Nigeria: evidence from Enugu metropolis.

The current spate of building collapse in Nigeria has continued to attract research efforts to unravel the causes and possible remedies. Although cases of building collapse in Nigeria has been associated with several factors, those factors associated with building plan approval process have not adequately investigated, especially in a rapidly expanding colonial city of Enugu. The study investigated the role of local town planning authorities in the increasing cases of collapsed buildings in Nigeria using Enugu as a case study. A well-structured questionnaire was administered to the three Chief Town Planners in the three planning approval offices and oral interviews randomly selected 30 developers in ongoing construction projects within Enugu metropolis were conducted. Using content analysis and descriptive statistics the data collected were analyzed. It was observed that due to poor staffing and lack of engagement of building professionals, the planning approval authorities were not effective in scrutinizing, vetting and evaluating building drawings submitted for approval as well as in supervising and monitoring the level of compliance of buildings under construction with the operational building codes and bye-laws in the study area. The study concludes that these lapses in the roles of local building approval authorities can contribute to the increasing cases of collapsed buildings in Enugu Metropolis. It recommends that government should take proactive steps by engaging the right number of building professionals in her planning approval offices and ensuring strict enforcement of the existing physical development legislation and punishment of offenders.

Free, open, quantitative and adaptable digital soil map data and database for Nigeria.

Nigeria's digital soil map (DSM) and database is the most comprehensive and detailed source of quantitative information on the country's soil distribution. Digital cartography and geographic information system (GIS) operations were methods used in producing the DSM and database. We obtained analogue soil data in 8 hard copy maps (each at a displayable scale of 1: 650,000) from the Federal Department of Agricultural Land Resources (FDALR), which archived the result of Nigeria's reconnaissance soil survey. The survey started in 1985 and by 1990; it has completed the compilation of hard copy maps that outline Nigeria's major soil distribution. Our experimental design begins with electronic scanning of these paper maps. We set the scanning system to 500 dpi, creating high-resolution raster images, which were imported into ESRI ArcGIS software, for orthorectification by geo-referencing to WGS 1984 geographic coordinate system. We applied a spatial processing tool on the orthorectified images and created a geometrically-seamless mosaicked raster image for the soil data of the whole Nigeria. Using GIS on-screen digitization - with optimal snapping tolerance - we created vector polygons (spatial data) of soil components (mapping units). Finally, we coded the metadata (attributes) of Nigeria's soil distribution into Microsoft EXCEL spreadsheet, which we linked to the soil spatial data. The combined spatial and attribute soil data forms the soil database for Nigeria and provides, on-demand, vital soil information, such as thematic maps of soil characteristics. The department of Geoinformatics and surveying University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus (UNEC) is the major repository of Nigeria's DSM and database.

Three-Dimensional Anorectal Manometry Enhances Diagnostic Gain by Detecting Sphincter Defects and Puborectalis Pressure.

BACKGROUND: Constipation and fecal incontinence (FI) are common and are often evaluated with anorectal manometry. Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) is a promising technology; however, implementation has been limited by lack of metrics and unclear clinical utility. AIM: To investigate the diagnostic utility of 3D HRAM compared to 2D HRAM. METHODS: Three-dimensional HRAM studies performed from April 2012 to October 2013 were identified and re-interpreted by two blinded investigators examining 3D function. Disagreements were resolved by a third investigator. Puborectalis (PR) visualization, focal defects, and dyssynergy were reported. Differences between groups were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. Discordance was analyzed with McNemar Chi-square test. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-one 3D HRAM studies were identified. Mean age and BMI were 52.2 ± 17.4 and 27.1 ± 7.5 years (81% female, 74% white). Most common indications for 3D HRAM were constipation (65%) and FI (28%). PR function was visualized in 81% (rest), 97% (squeeze), and 73% (strain). PR was visualized less often at rest in FI than constipation (68 vs. 85%, p = 0.007). Defects were identified twice as often in FI than constipation (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.113). Twenty-nine defects (86% anterior) were visualized on 3D HRAM. Inter-reader agreement was moderate for PR function (κ = 0.471), but fair for focal defects (κ = 0.304). CONCLUSIONS: PR function and focal defects can be visualized on 3D-HRAM with added diagnostic benefit compared to 2D. Fair inter-reader agreement for focal defects highlights the need for quantitative metrics.

Safety of Propofol Used as a Rescue Agent During Colonoscopy.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety of propofol when used by gastroenterologists in patients who have an inadequate response to standard sedation (narcotics and benzodiazepines). BACKGROUND: Many patients fail to achieve adequate sedation from narcotics and benzodiazepines during colonoscopy. The administration of propofol for colonoscopy is increasing, although its use by gastroenterologists is controversial. STUDY: We performed a retrospective review of our hospital's colonoscopy records from January 2006 to December 2009 to identify 403 subjects undergoing screening colonoscopies who required propofol (20 to 30 mg every 3 min as needed) because of inadequate response to standard sedation. We also randomly selected 403 controls undergoing screening colonoscopies from the same time period that only required standard sedation. The incidence of adverse effects was then compared. RESULTS: There were no major adverse events in either group. The rates of minor adverse events in the propofol and control group were 0.02 and 0.01, respectively (P=0.56). Adverse effects in the propofol group included: transient hypotension (n=1), nausea/vomiting (n=3), agitation (n=2), and rash (n=1). Adverse effects seen with standard sedation included: transient hypotension (n=2), nausea/vomiting (n=1), and oversedation (n=2). Patients who received propofol were more likely to be younger, had a history of illicit drug use, and a longer procedure time (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive propofol administered by gastroenterologist for conscious sedation was not associated with increased incidence of adverse events. It may be of value in patients who do not respond to conventional sedation.