Ultra-high-resolution spectral silicon-based photon-counting detector CT for coronary CT angiography: Initial results in a dynamic phantom.

BACKGROUND: Recent improvements in CT detector technology have led to smaller detector pixels resolving frequencies beyond 20 lp/cm and enabled ultra-high-resolution CT. Silicon-based photon-counting detector (PCD) CT is one such technology that promises improved spatial and spectral resolution. However, when the detector pixel sizes are reduced, the impact of cardiac motion on CT images becomes more pronounced. Here, we investigated the effects cardiac motion on the image quality of a clinical prototype Si-PCD scanner in a dynamic heart phantom. METHODS: A series of 3D-printed vessels were created to simulate coronary arteries with diameter in the 1-3.5 â€‹mm range. Four coronary stents were set inside the d â€‹= â€‹3.5 â€‹mm vessels and all vessels were filled with contrast agents and were placed inside a dynamic cardiac phantom. The phantom was scanned in motion (60 bpm) and at rest on a prototype clinical Si-PCD CT scanner in 8-bin spectral UHR mode. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) were generated at 70 â€‹keV and CT number accuracy and effective spatial resolution (blooming) of rest and motion VMIs were compared. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis of CT numbers showed excellent agreement (r â€‹> â€‹0.99) between rest and motion. We did not observe a significant difference (p â€‹> â€‹0.48) in estimating free lumen diameters. Differences in in-stent lumen diameter and stent strut thickness were non-significant with maximum mean difference of approximately 70 â€‹µm. CONCLUSION: We found no significant degradation in CT number accuracy or spatial resolution due to cardiac motion. The results demonstrate the potential of spectral UHR coronary CT angiography enabled by Si-PCD.

Further Improving Image Quality of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Angiography for Children With High Heart Rates Using Second-Generation Motion Correction Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: The state-of-art motion correction algorithm is inadequate for correcting motion artifacts in coronary arteries in cardiovascular computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for children with high heart rates, and even less effective for heart structures beyond coronary arteries. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a second-generation, whole-heart motion correction algorithm in improving the heart image quality of CCTA for children with high heart rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two consecutive symptomatic cardiac patients with high heart rates (122.6 ± 18.8 beats/min) were enrolled. All patients underwent CCTA on a 256-row CT using a prospective electrocardiogram-triggered single-beat protocol. Images were reconstructed using a standard algorithm (STD), state-of-the-art first-generation coronary artery motion correction algorithm (MC1), and second-generation, whole-heart motion correction algorithm (MC2). The image quality of the origin of left coronary, right coronary, aortic valve, pulmonary valve, mitral valve, tricuspid valve, aorta root, pulmonary artery root, ventricular septum (VS), and atrial septum (AS) was assessed by 2 experienced radiologists using a 4-point scale (1, nondiagnostic; 2, detectable; 3, measurable; and 4, excellent); nonparametric test was used to analyze and compare the differences among 3 groups; and post hoc multiple comparisons were used between different methods. RESULTS: There were group differences for cardiac structures except VS and AS, with MC2 having the best image quality and STD having the worst image quality. Post hoc multiple comparisons showed that MC2 was better than MC1 and STD in all structures except VS and AS where all 3 algorithms performed equally, whereas MC1 was better than STD only in the origin of left coronary, right coronary, and mitral valve. CONCLUSIONS: A second-generation, whole-heart motion correction algorithm further significantly improves cardiac image quality beyond the coronaries in CCTA for pediatric patients with high heart rates.

Automated quantification and evaluation of motion artifact on coronary CT angiography images.

PURPOSE: This study developed and validated a Motion Artifact Quantification algorithm to automatically quantify the severity of motion artifacts on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images. The algorithm was then used to develop a Motion IQ Decision method to automatically identify whether a CCTA dataset is of sufficient diagnostic image quality or requires further correction. METHOD: The developed Motion Artifact Quantification algorithm includes steps to identify the right coronary artery (RCA) regions of interest (ROIs), segment vessel and shading artifacts, and to calculate the motion artifact score (MAS) metric. The segmentation algorithms were verified against ground-truth manual segmentations. The segmentation algorithms were also verified by comparing and analyzing the MAS calculated from ground-truth segmentations and the algorithm-generated segmentations. The Motion IQ Decision algorithm first identifies slices with unsatisfactory image quality using a MAS threshold. The algorithm then uses an artifact-length threshold to determine whether the degraded vessel segment is large enough to cause the dataset to be nondiagnostic. An observer study on 30 clinical CCTA datasets was performed to obtain the ground-truth decisions of whether the datasets were of sufficient image quality. A five-fold cross-validation was used to identify the thresholds and to evaluate the Motion IQ Decision algorithm. RESULTS: The automated segmentation algorithms in the Motion Artifact Quantification algorithm resulted in Dice coefficients of 0.84 for the segmented vessel regions and 0.75 for the segmented shading artifact regions. The MAS calculated using the automated algorithm was within 10% of the values obtained using ground-truth segmentations. The MAS threshold and artifact-length thresholds were determined by the ROC analysis to be 0.6 and 6.25 mm by all folds. The Motion IQ Decision algorithm demonstrated 100% sensitivity, 66.7% ± 27.9% specificity, and a total accuracy of 86.7% ± 12.5% for identifying datasets in which the RCA required correction. The Motion IQ Decision algorithm demonstrated 91.3% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity, and a total accuracy of 86.7% for identifying CCTA datasets that need correction for any of the three main vessels. CONCLUSION: The Motion Artifact Quantification algorithm calculated accurate (<10% error) motion artifact scores using the automated segmentation methods. The developed algorithms demonstrated high sensitivity (91.3%) and specificity (71.4%) in identifying datasets of insufficient image quality. The developed algorithms for automatically quantifying motion artifact severity may be useful for comparing acquisition techniques, improving best-phase selection algorithms, and evaluating motion compensation techniques.

Evaluation of motion artifact metrics for coronary CT angiography.

PURPOSE: This study quantified the performance of coronary artery motion artifact metrics relative to human observer ratings. Motion artifact metrics have been used as part of motion correction and best-phase selection algorithms for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA). However, the lack of ground truth makes it difficult to validate how well the metrics quantify the level of motion artifact. This study investigated five motion artifact metrics, including two novel metrics, using a dynamic phantom, clinical CCTA images, and an observer study that provided ground-truth motion artifact scores from a series of pairwise comparisons. METHOD: Five motion artifact metrics were calculated for the coronary artery regions on both phantom and clinical CCTA images: positivity, entropy, normalized circularity, Fold Overlap Ratio (FOR), and Low-Intensity Region Score (LIRS). CT images were acquired of a dynamic cardiac phantom that simulated cardiac motion and contained six iodine-filled vessels of varying diameter and with regions of soft plaque and calcifications. Scans were repeated with different gantry start angles. Images were reconstructed at five phases of the motion cycle. Clinical images were acquired from 14 CCTA exams with patient heart rates ranging from 52 to 82 bpm. The vessel and shading artifacts were manually segmented by three readers and combined to create ground-truth artifact regions. Motion artifact levels were also assessed by readers using a pairwise comparison method to establish a ground-truth reader score. The Kendall's Tau coefficients were calculated to evaluate the statistical agreement in ranking between the motion artifacts metrics and reader scores. Linear regression between the reader scores and the metrics was also performed. RESULTS: On phantom images, the Kendall's Tau coefficients of the five motion artifact metrics were 0.50 (normalized circularity), 0.35 (entropy), 0.82 (positivity), 0.77 (FOR), 0.77(LIRS), where higher Kendall's Tau signifies higher agreement. The FOR, LIRS, and transformed positivity (the fourth root of the positivity) were further evaluated in the study of clinical images. The Kendall's Tau coefficients of the selected metrics were 0.59 (FOR), 0.53 (LIRS), and 0.21 (Transformed positivity). In the study of clinical data, a Motion Artifact Score, defined as the product of FOR and LIRS metrics, further improved agreement with reader scores, with a Kendall's Tau coefficient of 0.65. CONCLUSION: The metrics of FOR, LIRS, and the product of the two metrics provided the highest agreement in motion artifact ranking when compared to the readers, and the highest linear correlation to the reader scores. The validated motion artifact metrics may be useful for developing and evaluating methods to reduce motion in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) images.

Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography.

Coronary artery imaging with x-ray computed tomography (CT) is one of the most recent advancements in CT clinical applications. Although existing "state-of-the-art" clinical protocols today utilize helical data acquisition, it suffers from the lack of ability to handle irregular heart rate and relatively high x-ray dose to patients. In this paper, we propose a step-and-shoot data acquisition protocol that significantly overcomes these shortcomings. The key to the proposed protocol is the large volume coverage (40 mm) enabled by the cone beam CT scanner, which allows the coverage of the entire heart in 3 to 4 steps. In addition, we propose a gated complementary reconstruction algorithm that overcomes the longitudinal truncation problem resulting from the cone beam geometry. Computer simulations, phantom experiments, and clinical studies were conducted to validate our approach.

Feasibility and validation of registration of three-dimensional left atrial models derived from computed tomography with a noncontact cardiac mapping system.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and assess the validity of registering three-dimensional (3D) models from computed tomographic (CT) images using a cardiac mapping system. BACKGROUND: Registration of 3D anatomic models with an interventional system could help identify and navigate mapping and ablation catheters over a complex structure such as the left atrium (LA). METHODS: ECG-gated, contrast-enhanced cardiac CT imaging was performed in 14 patients with atrial fibrillation. Segmentation was used to create 3D models of the LA. The 3D models were registered with the mapping system using a series of fiducial points. Registration was accomplished retrospectively in the first 10 patients, and catheter navigation was visualized from recorded data. In the final four patients, registration was accomplished in real time during electrophysiologic study. The mapping catheter position, as it was navigated inside the LA, was applied to the registered model in real time. For the validation study, temporary pacing leads were implanted in the LA of 10 dogs. Following this, CT scanning, segmentation, LA model importation, and registration was described previously. After registration, a mapping catheter was positioned at the site of each buried lead according to the registered model with no fluoroscopic guidance. A radiofrequency lesion was created at this location, and the dog was sacrificed, the heart removed and stained, and the distance between the buried lead and the lesion measured. RESULTS: During the feasibility study, the location of the catheter in the registered model correlated with fluoroscopy, angiography, and intracardiac electrograms. LA endocardial potentials during sinus rhythm and any premature atrial contractions also were successfully delineated over the registered models. In the validation study, the mean target registration error was 2.0 +/- 3.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of CT-derived 3D models of the LA using a cardiac mapping system is feasible and accurate.