Underdiagnosis of Nasoorbitoethmoid Fractures in Patients with Zygoma Injury.

BACKGROUND: Nasoorbitoethmoid fractures commonly accompany midface fractures and may be underdiagnosed, resulting in incomplete reconstruction or inadequate treatment following facial trauma. To better understand the nasoorbitoethmoid fracture diagnosis and treatment tendencies, the authors analyzed concomitant nasoorbitoethmoid injuries in the setting of zygoma fractures. METHODS: The facial trauma database at a level I trauma center was evaluated. All patients with diagnosed zygoma fractures from June of 2011 to March of 2016 were assessed for a concomitant nasoorbitoethmoid injury. Documentation of these fractures in radiology, plastic surgery, and operative notes was recorded, as was the rate of nasoorbitoethmoid fracture surgical repair. RESULTS: The authors identified 339 eligible patients and completed retrospective analysis of computed tomographic images for their 356 zygoma fractures. The incidence of concomitant nasoorbitoethmoid fractures was 30.6 percent (109 of 356). Documentation rates of nasoorbitoethmoid fractures were 0 percent, 3.7 percent, and 8.3 percent in radiology, plastic surgery, and operative notes, respectively. The rate of surgical correction of nasoorbitoethmoid injuries was 22.9 percent (25 of 109). Of those fractures identified, 44.9 percent (49 of 109) were minimally displaced or nondisplaced. Subset analysis of only significantly displaced fractures yielded an incidence of 16.8 percent (60 of 356). Of significantly displaced fractures, documentation rates were 0 percent, 6.7 percent, and 16.8 percent in radiology, plastic surgery, and operative notes, respectively. The surgical repair rate of significantly displaced fractures was 31.7 percent (19 of 60). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a high concomitance rate of nasoorbitoethmoid fractures with zygoma fractures and identify a tendency to underdocument and undertreat this injury pattern. Clinicians managing patients with midface trauma should have a high suspicion for nasoorbitoethmoid trauma. Plastic surgeons and radiologists should be better trained in identifying the nasoorbitoethmoid fracture pattern.

Antibiotics and facial fractures: evidence-based recommendations compared with experience-based practice.

Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in craniofacial fracture management is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare evidence-based literature recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in facial fracture management with expert-based practice. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify published studies evaluating pre-, peri-, and postoperative efficacy of antibiotics in facial fracture management by facial third. Study level of evidence was assessed according to the American Society of Plastic Surgery criteria, and graded practice recommendations were made based on these assessments. Expert opinions were garnered during the Advanced Orbital Surgery Symposium in the form of surveys evaluating senior surgeon clinical antibiotic prescribing practices by time point and facial third. A total of 44 studies addressing antibiotic prophylaxis and facial fracture management were identified. Overall, studies were of poor quality, precluding formal quantitative analysis. Studies supported the use of perioperative antibiotics in all facial thirds, and preoperative antibiotics in comminuted mandible fractures. Postoperative antibiotics were not supported in any facial third. Survey respondents (n = 17) cumulatively reported their antibiotic prescribing practices over 286 practice years and 24,012 facial fracture cases. Percentages of prescribers administering pre-, intra-, and postoperative antibiotics, respectively, by facial third were as follows: upper face 47.1, 94.1, 70.6; midface 47.1, 100, 70.6%; and mandible 68.8, 94.1, 64.7%. Preoperative but not postoperative antibiotic use is recommended for comminuted mandible fractures. Frequent use of pre- and postoperative antibiotics in upper and midface fractures is not supported by literature recommendations, but with low-level evidence. Higher level studies may better guide clinical antibiotic prescribing practices.

Evidence for safe tourniquet use in 500 consecutive upper extremity procedures.

BACKGROUND: Although pneumatic tourniquets are widely used in upper extremity surgery, further evidence is needed to support their safe use. Excessive pressure and prolonged ischemic time can cause soft-tissue injury. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of tourniquet use in a yearlong, consecutive series of patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent upper extremity surgery by two board-certified hand surgeons over a 1-year period was performed. Demographic variables, comorbidities, and complications were noted along with tourniquet parameters, including application site, ischemic pressure, and time. RESULTS: A total 505 patients were included in the study because a tourniquet was used during their operation. Patients ranged in age from 3 months to 90 years old (mean 40.1 years). More than half of the population was overweight (mean body mass index (BMI) 27.1), and 77.1 % of adults had at least one cardiac risk factor. No immediate or delayed tourniquet-related injuries were identified. The average operative time was 35.9 min, with an average tourniquet time of 33.1 min. Tourniquet inflation pressure of 250 or 225 mmHg was utilized in 78 and 21 % of adult patients, respectively; no patients had a pressure setting exceeding 275 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In this series of more than 500 operations, there were no immediate or delayed tourniquet-related events using parameters determined perioperatively by the attending surgeon. Tourniquet pressures of 250 mmHg or less in adult patients with less than 2 h of ischemic time appear to be safe, even in the elderly and patients with multiple medical comorbidities.

Assessment of surgical residents in a vascular anastomosis laboratory.

BACKGROUND: We designed a simple, low-cost workshop to teach surgical residents the basic skills of vascular anastomosis. We studied our ability to identify objective procedural and end-product metrics that could be used to measure improvement in vascular anastomotic skill before and after training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten postgraduate year 2 residents without previous vascular surgery experience and four attending surgeons (expert) performed end-to-side anastomosis using a synthetic graft. The residents were taught the basic skills of vascular anastomosis during three didactic workshops. The objective metrics included volume leakage after saline perfusion (leak) and the time needed to complete the anastomosis. Penalty points were assigned for broken sutures, air knots, locking sutures, and failure to maintain an outside-in to inside-out technique. The leak, time, and penalties before and after training were compared. RESULTS: The mean leak was 70.4 ± 13.7 mL and the mean completion time was 18.7 ± 3 min for the pretraining group versus 45.3 ± 10.6 mL (P < 0.01) and 8.5 ± 1 min (P < 0.001), respectively, for the attending group. After training, significant improvement was seen in resident leak (46.7 ± 6.8 mL; P < 0.001) and completion time (14.4 ± 3 min; P < 0.01). Leak was similar between the post-training and expert groups (46.7 ± 6.8 mL and 45.3 ± 10.6 mL, respectively; P = 0.77); however, a significant difference for the completion time remained (14.4 ± 3.0 min and 8.5 ± 1 min, respectively; P < 0.01). The mean number of technical errors improved from 2.7 in the pretraining group to zero for the post-training group after completing the workshop. CONCLUSIONS: We have reported an easy to implement workshop for teaching surgical residents the basic skills of performing vascular anastomosis.