Shock-absorbing flooring for fall-related injury prevention in older adults and staff in hospitals and care homes: the SAFEST systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Injurious falls in hospitals and care homes are a life-limiting and costly international issue. Shock-absorbing flooring may offer part of the solution; however, evidence is required to inform decision-making. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shock-absorbing flooring for fall-related injury prevention among older adults in care settings. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of experimental, observational, qualitative and economic studies evaluating flooring in care settings targeting older adults and/or staff. Studies identified by a scoping review (inception to May 2016) were screened, and the search of MEDLINE, AgeLine and Scopus (to September 2019) was updated, alongside other sources. Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias in duplicate (using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions tool, or the Joanna Briggs Institute's qualitative tool). RESULTS: Of the 22 included studies, 20 assessed the outcomes (three randomised controlled trials; and seven observational, five qualitative and five economic studies) on novel floors (n = 12), sports floors (n = 5), carpet (n = 5) and wooden subfloors (n = 1). Quantitative data related to 11,857 patient/resident falls (nine studies) and 163 staff injuries (one study). Qualitative studies included patients/residents (n = 20), visitors (n = 8) and staff (n = 119). Hospital-based randomised controlled trial data were too imprecise; however, very low-quality evidence indicated that novel/sports flooring reduced injurious falls from three per 1000 patients per day on vinyl with concrete subfloors to two per 1000 patients per day (rate ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.84; two studies), without increasing falls rates (two studies). One care home-based randomised controlled trial found that a novel underlay produces similar injurious falls rates (high-quality evidence) and falls rates (moderate-quality evidence) to those of a plywood underlay with vinyl overlays and concrete subfloors. Very low-quality data demonstrated that, compared with rigid floors, novel/sports flooring reduced the number of falls resulting in injury in care homes (26.4% vs. 33.0%; risk ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.91; three studies) and hospitals (27.1% vs. 42.4%; risk ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.93; two studies). Fracture and head injury outcomes were imprecise; however, hip fractures reduced from 30 per 1000 falls on concrete to 18 per 1000 falls on wooden subfloors in care homes (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.78; one study; very low-quality evidence). Four low-quality economic studies concluded that shock-absorbing flooring reduced costs and improved outcomes (three studies), or increased costs and improved outcomes (one study). One, more robust, study estimated that shock-absorbing flooring resulted in fewer quality-adjusted life-years and lower costs, if the number of falls increased on shock-absorbing floors, but that shock-absorbing flooring would be a dominant economic strategy if the number of falls remained the same. Staff found moving wheeled equipment more difficult on shock-absorbing floors, leading to workplace adaptations. Staff injuries were observed; however, very low-quality evidence suggests that these are no less frequent on rigid floors. LIMITATIONS: Evidence favouring shock-absorbing flooring is of very low quality; thus, much uncertainty remains. CONCLUSIONS: Robust evidence is lacking in hospitals and indicates that one novel floor may not be effective in care homes. Very low-quality evidence indicates that shock-absorbing floors may be beneficial; however, wider workplace implications need to be addressed. Work is required to establish a core outcome set, and future research needs to more comprehensively deal with confounding and the paucity of hospital-based studies, and better plan for workplace adaptations in the study design. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019118834. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

AIM: The aim of this study was to summarise what is known about shock-absorbing flooring for reducing injurious falls in hospitals and care homes. BACKGROUND: Falls and fall-related injuries are a major problem for older adults in both hospitals and care homes. Shock-absorbing flooring (such as carpet, sports floors or specially designed floors) provides a more cushioned surface and is one potential solution to help reduce the impact forces from a fall. METHODS: From literature searches, we identified relevant studies on shock-absorbing flooring use in hospitals and care homes. We gathered data on the quality of the studies' methods, what and who the studies involved, and the study findings. Members of the public were involved throughout the project. They helped improve the clarity of the reporting and collaborated in meetings to help guide the study team. FINDINGS: One high-quality study in a care home found that vinyl overlay with novel shock-absorbing underlay was no better at reducing injuries than vinyl overlay with plywood underlay on concrete subfloors. We found very low-quality evidence that shock-absorbing flooring may reduce injuries in hospitals and care homes, without increasing falls; if this were true, then economic evidence suggested that shock-absorbing flooring would be the best-value option for patients (lower cost and improved outcomes). There was insufficient evidence to determine the effects of shock-absorbing flooring on fractures or head injuries, although wooden subfloors resulted in fewer hip fractures than concrete subfloors. Shock-absorbing flooring made it harder for staff to move equipment such as beds and trolleys, and led to staff changing how they work. IMPLICATIONS: The evidence suggests that one type of shock-absorbing floor may not work in care homes, compared with rigid flooring; however, gaps still exist in the knowledge. The evidence in favour of shock-absorbing flooring was of very low quality, meaning it is uncertain. There is a lack of robust evidence in hospitals, which often have concrete subfloors and different population characteristics. If planning to install shock-absorbing flooring, it is important to consider the wider impacts on the workplace and how best to manage these.

Delivering meat carcasses/cuts to craft-butcher shops: an investigation of work characteristics and manual handling hazards.

This study investigated delivery scenarios of service drivers working in the retail meat industry. The methodology included analysis of accident reports, and field investigations of deliveries at craft-butcher shop premises, including semi-structured interviews with managers and workers. The findings provide greater clarity about the hazards in this job, and suggest for peripatetic delivery activities, four main factors on which decisions about risk and good practice may be made: composition of the orders; characteristics of the delivery vehicle/truck; handling method most often used; and, the road/access conditions.

Patient safety during assistant propelled wheelchair transfers: the effect of the seat cushion on risk of falling.

This article is a report of a study of the effect of the seat cushion on risk of falling from a wheelchair. Two laboratory studies and simulated assistant propelled wheelchair transfers were conducted with four healthy female participants. For the laboratory studies there were three independent variables: trunk posture (upright/flexed forward), seat cushion (flat polyurethane/propad low profile), and feet condition (dangling/supported), and two dependent variables: occupied wheelchair (wheelchair) center of gravity (CG), and stability. For the simulated transfers there was one independent variable: seat cushion (flat polyurethane/propad low profile), and one dependent variable: perception of safety (risk of falling). Results showed that the wheelchair CG was closer to the front wheels, and stability lower for the propad low profile cushion compared to the polyurethane cushion, when the participants sat with their feet dangling. During the simulated transfers, sitting on the propad low profile cushion caused participants to feel more apprehensive (anxious or uneasy) compared to sitting on the polyurethane cushion. The findings can contribute to the assessment of risk and care planning of non-ambulatory wheelchair users.

Ready steady push--a study of the role of arm posture in manual exertions.

This study investigated arm posture and hand forces during bi-manual pushing. Nine male and eight female participants performed isometric exertions at two reach distances (0 and elbow-grip) and six different positions of the hand interface (handle), defined by the plane (longitudinal, lateral, horizontal) and orientation (0 degrees and 45 degrees). Electrogoniometer instruments were used to measure the displacements/postures of the wrist and elbow joints and the forearm, and force measuring strain gauges were used to measure the exerted hand forces (x-, y- and z-components). The results showed that ability to vary arm posture, particularly the forearm, is important during build up of force and that people tend to seek for a balance in the forces applied at the hands by exerting more in the vertical direction. Also, lateral plane handle positions permitted exertion of greater forces than longitudinal and horizontal plane positions.

City bus driving and low back pain: a study of the exposures to posture demands, manual materials handling and whole-body vibration.

A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate worker exposure to posture demands, manual materials handling (MMH) and whole body vibration as risks for low back pain (LBP). Using validated questionnaire, information about driving experience, driving (sitting) posture MMH, and health history was obtained from 80 city bus drivers. Twelve drivers were observed during their service route driving (at least one complete round trip) and vibration measurements were obtained at the seat and according to the recommendations of ISO 2631 (1997), for three models of bus (a mini-bus, a single-decker bus, a double-decker bus). The results showed that city bus drivers spend about 60% of the daily work time actually driving, often with the torso straight or unsupported, perform occasional and light MMH, and experience discomforting shock/jerking vibration events. Transient and mild LBP (not likely to interfere with work or customary levels of activity) was found to be prevalent among the drivers and a need for ergonomic evaluation of the drivers' seat was suggested.

Postures adopted when using a two-wheeled cylinder trolley.

Upper limb and trunk positions were investigated when subjects exerted force to start and move a two-wheeled cylinder trolley with four different handles. Three of the handles had orientations 35 degrees, 50 degrees and 70 degrees in the sagittal plane (relative to the back of the trolley). The fourth was the 50 degrees handles fitted with a link bar. Measurements were made of x (horizontal), y (lateral) and z (vertical) coordinates of the body joints in space throughout the motion, using a CODA MPX30 optical 3-D measurement system, and both linear and angular displacements were computed. The linear and angular positions of the body joints were found to change through the stages of the task. Orientation of the handle influenced the arm postures adopted in the task, and showed to produce different patterns of arm displacement in force exertion to tilt the trolley from standing position. For steady movement, the sagittal plane 50 degrees handle proved most desirable.

Pouring liquid from a pot-kinematics of an everyday task.

An experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of handle design on postures in the use of pots. Six combinations of handle (sloping, vertical and curved) and spout designs (long and short) were tested during grasping, lifting and pouring. The fill load was 1000 ml of water at the prevailing room temperature (about 20 degrees C) and three males and three females were involved as subjects. Measurements were made of x- (horizontal), y- (lateral) and z- (vertical) co-ordinates of the wrist, elbow shoulder and hip joints in space throughout the motions, using a CODA MPX30 optical 3D measurement system and both linear and angular displacements of the arm joints and trunk were computed. Very different configurations of arm posture were found to be adopted at the moment of pot lift, and when pouring commences and the subjects' movement patterns during transfer of the pot to fill vessel showed to be influenced by the configuration of arm posture adopted at the moment of pot lift. For lifting the pot, the vertical handle design proved to be more desirable than either the curved or sloping design, while for pouring from the pot the short spout proved to be more desirable than the long spout, at least when the pot was full. The results are however, not clear on which handle or spout design is best for transferring the pot.