Nasal MRSA screening for surgical patients: predictive value for postoperative infections caused by MRSA.

PURPOSE: Postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are occasionally fatal. We hypothesized that nasal MRSA screening might predict the risk of postoperative MRSA infections. The aim of the current study was to elucidate the relationship between the positivity of nasal MRSA screening and postoperative MRSA infections. METHODS: Six hundred and fourteen surgical patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit and underwent nasal MRSA screening between April 2006 and March 2011 were divided into MRSA-positive and -negative groups. The incidence of postoperative MRSA infections in the MRSA-positive and MRSA-negative groups were compared, and various risk factors for MRSA infections were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative MRSA infections, such as pneumonia and enteritis, in the MRSA-positive group was significantly higher than that in the MRSA-negative group (41.9 vs. 3.1 %). The significant independent risk factors for postoperative MRSA infections were a positive MRSA screening, an operation lasting more than 300 min and an emergency operation. A positive MRSA screening was the most statistically significant risk factor for postoperative MRSA pneumonia and enteritis, but was not a risk factor for MRSA surgical site infections. CONCLUSION: Nasal MRSA screening can help to identify patients who have an increased risk of developing postoperative MRSA infections, and would enable physicians to take a prompt action if these complications occur.

Results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in high-risk patients - estimation of surgical risk of gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgical risk of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in high risk patients was evaluated with E-PASS scoring system. METHODOLOGY: This study was based on 63 patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy; 14 patients belonging to high risk group (ASA≥3) and 49 classified as low risk group (ASA≤2). Fifty six patients who underwent conventional gastrectomy were used for comparison. RESULTS: Intra- and postoperative complications were found in 4 and 3 of 14 high risk patients, respectively. We found a significant correlation between E-PASS score and complications. E-PASS score in high risk group was significantly higher than the value in low risk group. The estimated in-hospital mortality rate was significantly different between the two groups. When conventional gastrectomy group for high risk patients was compared, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar in two surgical procedures; however E-PASS score and the estimated in-hospital mortality rate with conventional gastrectomy were significantly higher than the value with laparoscopic gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: There were no fatal complications in high risk patients with laparoscopic gastrectomy and E-PASS score was within safety margin. Extension of laparoscopic surgery in high risk patients was feasible when careful procedure was performed by a surgical team.

[The operated case of 89 year-old patient with pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung].

A-89-year-old male patient who complained dry cough was detected lung mass of 3 cm size in diameter at the right upper lobe by CT. FDG-PET seemed to show hilar and mediastinum lymph nodes metastasis. After three weeks, the mass showed rapid growth with 5 cm diameter in size at CT. Therefore the original tumor was supposed to be undifferentiated carcinoma, above all, pleomorphic carcinoma. He had been done pulmonary resection after short period. The right upper lobectomy with combined resection of the partial middle lobe was performed. Hilar and mediastinum lymph nodes dissection was added. In pathological examination, the tumor was proved pleomorphic carcinoma, however, no lymph node metastasis was recognized. He did not refer any complications and discharged back home at the post-operative 11th day. Pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung is known to be difficult to obtain definite diagnosis in early stage because of rapid growth. Therefore many cases are detected in advanced stage. In addition, chemotherapy is generally not effective, so only operative resection seems to be useful. Our patient was 89-year-old, he tolerated the operation and was alive with no trouble during 6 months after resection. When complete resection seems to be possible, operation should be regarded as an initial treatment.

Using the E-PASS scoring system to estimate the risk of emergency abdominal surgery in patients with acute gastrointestinal disease.

PURPOSE: The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system, which quantifies a patient's reserve and surgical stress, is used to predict morbidity and mortality in patients before elective gastrointestinal surgery. We conducted this study to clarify whether the E-PASS scoring system is useful for assessing the risks of emergency abdominal surgery. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 51 patients who underwent emergency gastrointestinal surgery at a public general hospital. The main outcomes were the E-PASS scores and the postoperative course, defined by mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Postoperative complications developed in 15 of the 51 patients (29.4%). The E-PASS score was significantly higher in the patients with postoperative complications than in those without (0.61 ± 0.31 vs 0.20 ± 0.35, respectively; n = 36). The morbidity rates were significantly lower in the patients with a value less than 0.5 than in those with a value more than 0.5 (17.1% and 56.3%, respectively; P < 0.01). There were 7 operative deaths among the 16 patients with a high score, versus none among the 9 patients with a low score (P < 0.01). Three patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection with a good postoperative course, with scores of less than 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: The E-PASS scoring system is useful for surgical decision making and evaluating whether patients will tolerate emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Minimally invasive therapy would assist in lowering the risk of complications.

Efficacy of surgical microwave therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcome in surgical microwave therapy (MW) for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: An institutional review board approved and single-institutional study of surgical MW of unresectable HCC was conducted from May 2003 to December 2010. The median follow-up period was 19 months (range 1-77 months). RESULTS: A total of 60 patients underwent 143 surgical MW for unresectable HCC. Of these, 15 patients had initial HCC and 45 had recurrent HCC. The median tumor size of HCC was 1.95 cm (range 0.8-3.3 cm). The median numbers of nodules that underwent surgical MW were 2 (range 1-9). Multinodular type was found in 33 patients (55%). Morbidity was 18.3%, and there was zero mortality. Also, 3 patients (5%) had incomplete MW. Of the 60 patients, 39 (65%) had recurrence, and 7 (11.6%) had local recurrence. The 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates of the patients who underwent surgical MW for initial HCC were 55.1 and 36.7%, respectively, and those for recurrent HCC were 41.6% and 8.8%, respectively. A tumor size ≥ 2.0 cm and multiple nodules were selected as independent and significant indicators for recurrence of the disease. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates after the surgical MW procedure were 93.9, 53.8, and 43.1%, respectively. A level of des-gamma carboxyprothrombin (DCP) was an independent and significant indicator for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical MW is an effective method for treating initial or recurrent unresectable HCC, and it can be undergone safely.