Addressing Barriers to Entry and Retention of Women in Interventional Vascular Specialties With Proposed Solutions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Representation of women in interventional vascular fields (interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, and vascular surgery) lags behind that in other specialties. With women representing half of all medical school graduates, encouraging parity of women in these fields needs to start in medical school. Barriers to pursuing careers in vascular intervention include insufficient exposure during core clerkships, early mentorship, visibility of women in the field, length of training, lifestyle considerations, work culture and environment, and concerns about radiation exposure. This scientific statement highlights potential solutions for both the real and perceived barriers that women may face in pursuing careers in vascular intervention, including streamlining of training (as both interventional radiology and vascular surgery have done with a resultant increase in percentage of women trainees), standardization of institutional promotion of women in leadership, and professional and industry partnerships for the retention and advancement of women.

Current State of Private Practice and Academic Interventional Radiology: Differences in Practice Structure, Case Mix, and Productivity.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether private practice interventional radiology (IR) groups self-report higher overall productivity given differing case mix and more diagnostic radiology interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 60-question survey was distributed to 3,159 self-identified US IR physicians via the Society of Interventional Radiologists member search engine, with 357 responses (11.3% response rate). Of these responses, there were 258 unique practices from 34 US states. RESULTS: Out of 84 IR group responses, private practice IR (PPIR) physicians reported a minimal trend for higher annual work relative value units (wRVUs) per clinical full-time equivalent compared with academic IR physicians (8,000 versus 7,140, P = .202), but this did not reach statistical significance. PPIR groups reported fewer median weekly hours (50 versus 52), more frequent call (every 6 versus every 5 days), and significantly higher median tenured compensation ($573,000 versus $451,000, P = .000). Out of 179 responses, academic practices reported significantly higher case percentages of interventional oncology and complex hepatobiliary intervention (P <.001), and private practices reported significantly higher percentages of musculoskeletal intervention (P < .001) with a nonsignificant trend for stroke or neurologic intervention (P = .010). Private practices reported more wRVUs from the interpretation of diagnostic imaging, at 26% of total wRVU production compared with 7% of total wRVU production for academic practices (P < .001; n = 131). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported data from private and academic IR groups suggest minimally higher wRVUs per clinical full-time equivalent among PPIRs with lower weekly work hours, more frequent call, differing case mix, and significantly higher tenured compensation among PPIR groups.

Opportunities for Excellence in Interventional Radiology Training: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: The training experience in interventional radiology (IR) residency programs varies widely across the country. The introduction of an IR training pathway has provided the impetus for the specialty to better define outstanding IR education and for programs to rethink how their curricula prepare IR trainees for real-world practice. Although ACGME competencies define several training components that are necessary for independent practice, few quantitative or qualitative studies have explored current perceptions on what constitutes optimal IR training. Our goal was to qualitatively explore program training features deemed most important to adequately prepare IR physicians for practice and assess whether there were differences in perception between academic and nonacademic practices. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 71 IR attending physicians, trainees, and support staff across the United States. All interviews were performed over the telephone by a single researcher for consistency and systematically coded by two independent coders for common themes. Frequency and prevalence of themes and facilitating features were analyzed. RESULTS: The most frequently perceived facilitating features included longitudinal patient care experience, practice-building education, interspecialty collaboration exposure, broad case mix, clinical decision-making exposure, diagnostic radiology training, procedural skills training, and graduated autonomy. Comparing nonacademic versus academic practice settings, significantly more nonacademic IR attending physicians expressed practice-building education (prevalence 72% versus 42%, frequency 2.2 versus 0.7, P < .01) as an important training experience. DISCUSSION: An understanding of perceived facilitating features for optimal IR trainee preparation, including potentially different needs between academic and nonacademic practices, can help programs prepare their trainees for a successful transition into practice.

The power of proximity: Effects of a multidisciplinary fibroid clinic on inter-specialty perceptions and practice patterns.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary collaboration has generally been shown to have positive effects on healthcare but can be difficult to facilitate. This study assessed the effects of a multidisciplinary fibroid clinic on practice patterns and clinician perceptions to better understand drivers of interspecialty collaboration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Annual rates of hysterectomies, myomectomies, and uterine fibroid embolizations (UFEs) performed in an urban healthcare system were collected from 2012-2019. Rates of each procedure were compared over time before and after launching a multidisciplinary fibroid clinic at the academic medical center. Referral rates were also compared. The gynecologists and interventional radiologists (IRs) involved in the clinic were interviewed 2 years prior to and after the clinic launch about their approaches to fibroids and perceptions of others who treat this condition. A phenomenological approach was used to identify and compare themes within the interviews by two researchers with excellent inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.80). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Annual rates of fibroid procedures increased over time (p<0.01) but the relative number of UFEs decreased (p = 0.01). UFE referrals by the clinic gynecologists significantly increased as did the number of combined fibroid procedures (p<0.01). However, the rates of one fibroid procedure relative to others were not different between the clinic and rest of the healthcare system (p = 0.55). Specialty-specific perceptions of fibroid treatments and inter-specialty dynamics did not change. Despite this, clinicians unanimously perceived the clinic and post-clinic practice patterns as positive and distinct from their previous work and relationships between gynecology and IR elsewhere. Limitations of this study included its single clinic design and potential confounder of differences in advertising pre- versus post-clinic. CONCLUSION: Creating the right practice environment may be more important for fostering inter-specialty collaboration and work satisfaction than shared mental models or procedural volumes in certain practice settings.