Lich-Gregoir technique and routine use of double J catheter as the best combination to avoid urinary complications in kidney transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary complications in kidney transplantation cause patient morbidity and can decrease graft survival. Most of the complications stem from the vesicoureteric anastomosis. Different techniques for ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) have been designed to avoid these complications. The routine use of a double J catheter after the anastomosis has the same purpose. Our aim was to show our experience and compare the use or non-use of a double J catheter and different techniques for ureteric reimplantation with the rate of urologic complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, nonrandomized study of 1011 renal transplantations performed between July 1985 and April 2012. We recorded the surgical techniques for UNC, the use or non-use of a double J catheter, and urinary complications (ureteric fistulae and strictures). The first 700 kidney transplantations (group A) were performed using several UNC techniques (Taguchi, Leadbetter-Politano, and Lich-Gregoir) with a selective use of double J catheter according to the criteria of the surgeon. In the last 311 patients (group B), a surgical technique was established (Lich-Gregoir), as well as the universal use of double J catheters. RESULTS: Urinary fistula occurred in 7% of group A patients and 2% of group B patients (P = .0001). Ureteric stricture occurred in 5.3% of patients in group A and 3% of group B patients (P = .09). In our study, routine prophylactic stenting combined with the Lich-Gregoir UNC technique has decreased the incidence of postoperative fistulae. CONCLUSIONS: Individually, the use of double J catheters seems to lessen the incidence of fistulae, although statistically, the difference is not significant. Accurate knowledge of the complications rates, recommendations of guidelines, and the early diagnosis are essential to attaining reasonable results in kidney transplantation.

[Morbidity and risk factors of transrectal prostate biopsy]. / Morbilidad y factores de riesgo de la biopsia transrectal prostática.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of minor complications that rarely need treatment (haematuria, hematospermia and rectal bleeding) and major complications (fever and shock) in patients undergoing transrectal biopsy of the prostate and to identify risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present an analytic and prospective study where we evaluated 146 patients subjected to transrectal biopsy of the prostate from December 2007 to September 2008. Complications rates and variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Eight patients (5,5%) suffered fever and seven (4,8%) of them were admitted. One of the patients (0,7%) suffered shock. The median of time between biopsy and fever was 3.5 days (1-10 days). Haematuria and hematospermia were more frequent in patients younger than 65 years (p<0.05) and fever and sepsis were more frequent in patients with prostate volume smaller than 55mL (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The complications of the transrectal biopsy of the prostate are frequent, autolimited and they rarely suppose a health hazard for the patients. The most frequent are haematuria and hemospermia, specially in younger patients, whereas infectious complications are rarer and in our study are more frequent in patients with smaller prostates. We must take into account that the information to the patient is very important after a prostate biopsy, so we can avoid useless consultations (for example with haematuria) and it will enable to identify important signs like fever earlier.