Re-irradiation and Hyperthermia in Breast Cancer.

Half of locoregional recurrences after breast cancer treatment are isolated events. Restaging should be carried out to select patients for curative salvage treatment. The approach depends on the characteristics of the primary and recurrent cancer, previous locoregional and systemic treatments, site of recurrence, comorbidities and the patient's wishes. A multidisciplinary discussion should be associated with the shared decision-making process. In view of the potential long-term disease-free survival, meticulous target volume delineation and selection of the most appropriate techniques should be used to decrease the risk of toxicity. This overview aims to provide clinicians with tools to manage the different scenarios of breast cancer patients with locoregional recurrences in the context of re-irradiation.

Treatment and prognostic factors of radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) after primary breast cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is a rare, aggressive disease. The incidence is increasing with the prolonged survival of women irradiated for primary breast cancer. Surgery is the current treatment of choice. Prognosis is poor. This review aims to evaluate all publications on primary treatment of RAAS to identify prognostic factors and evaluate treatment modalities. METHODS: Databases were searched for articles with published individual patient data on prognostic factors, treatment and follow-up of patients with RAAS. A regression analysis was performed to test the prognostic values of age, interval between primary treatment and RAAS, tumour size and grade on the local recurrence-free interval (LRFI) and overall survival (OS). The effects of treatment modalities surgery, radiation (with or without hyperthermia) and chemotherapy or combinations were evaluated. RESULTS: 74 articles were included, representing data on 222 patients. In these patients, the 5-year OS was 43% and 5-year LRFI was 32%. Tumour size and age were significant prognostic factors on LRFI and OS. Of all patients, 68% received surgery alone, 17% surgery and reirradiation and 6% surgery with chemotherapy. The remaining 9% received primary treatments without surgery. Surgery with radiotherapy had a better 5-year LRFI of 57% compared to 34% for surgery alone (p=0.008). The value of other treatment modalities could not be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review confirms the poor prognosis of RAAS. Tumour size and age were of prognostic value. The addition of reirradiation to surgery in the treatment of RAAS appears to enhance local control.

Preoperative chemoradiation combined with regional hyperthermia for patients with resectable esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyse the treatment results of neo-adjuvant chemoradiation combined with regional hyperthermia in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 2003 and December 2004, 28 patients entered a phase II study combining chemoradiation over a 4.5-week period with five sessions of regional hyperthermia. Chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin (AUC = 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2)) and radiotherapy of 41.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions. Locoregional hyperthermia was applied using the AMC phased array of four 70 MHz antennas, aiming at a stable tumor temperature of 41 degrees C for one hour. Carboplatin was infused during the hyperthermia session. Esophageal resection was planned at 6-8 weeks after the end of radiotherapy. The majority of the patients had a T3 tumor (86%) and were cN+ (64%). Median follow-up for survivors was 37 months (range 31-46). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (89%) completed the planned neo-adjuvant treatment and acute toxicity was generally mild. Twenty-six patients were operated on. A pathologically CR, PRmic, PR and SD were seen in 19%, 27%, 31% and 23% respectively. All patients had a R0 resection. In-field locoregional control during follow up for the operated patients was 100%. Quality of life was good for patients without disease progression. Survival rates at one, two and three years were 79%, 57% and 54% respectively. CONCLUSION: Neo-adjuvant chemoradiation combined with regional hyperthermia followed by esophageal resection for patients with esophageal cancer resulted in good locoregional control and overall survival.

Relation between body size and temperatures during locoregional hyperthermia of oesophageal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To analyse the relation between patients' body size and temperatures during locoregional hyperthermia for oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients were treated with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus hyperthermia, given with the AMC-4 waveguide system. Temperatures were measured at tumour location in the oesophageal lumen using multisensor thermocouple probes. Systemic temperature rise (DeltaT(syst)) was monitored rectally. Steady-state tumour temperatures were expressed in terms of T(90), T(50) and T(10), averaged over the five hyperthermia sessions, and correlated with patients' body mass, dorsoventral and lateral diameter and fat layer thickness, measured at tumour level using a CT scan made in treatment position. Fat percentage (Fat%) was estimated using diameters and fat layer thickness. Effective tumour perfusion (W(b)) was estimated from the temperature decay during the cool-down period. RESULTS: Temperatures were inversely related to body mass, diameters, fat layer thickness, and fat percentage. The strongest univariate correlations were found with lateral fat layer thickness, lateral diameter, and body mass. An increase in lateral diameter (28-->42 cm), or in lateral fat layer thickness (0-->40 mm) or in body mass (50-->120 kg) all yielded a approximately 1.5 degrees C decrease in tumour temperature rise. Multivariate correlation analysis proved that the combination of Fat%, DeltaT(syst) and W(b) was most predictive for the achieved tumour temperatures, accounting for 81 +/- 12% of the variance in temperatures. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-oesophageal temperatures during locoregional hyperthermia are inversely related to patients' body size parameters, of which fat percentage is the most significant prognostic factor. These findings could be used to define inclusion criteria of new studies on intrathoracic hyperthermia.

On verification of hyperthermia treatment planning for cervical carcinoma patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to verify hyperthermia treatment planning calculations by means of measurements performed during hyperthermia treatments. The calculated specific absorption rate (SAR(calc)) was compared with clinically measured SAR values, during 11 treatments in seven cervical carcinoma patients. METHODS: Hyperthermia treatments were performed using the 70 MHz AMC-4 waveguide system. Temperatures were measured using multisensor thermocouple probes. One invasive thermometry catheter in the cervical tumour and two non-invasive catheters in the vagina were used. For optimal tissue contact and fixation of the catheters, a gynaecological tampon was inserted, moisturized with distilled water (4 treatments), or saline (6 treatments) for better thermal contact. During one treatment no tampon was used. At the start of treatment the temperature rise (DeltaT(meas)) after a short power pulse was measured, which is proportional to SAR(meas). The SAR(calc) along the catheter tracks was extracted from the calculated SAR distribution and compared with the DeltaT(meas)-profiles. RESULTS: The correlation between DeltaT(meas) and SAR(calc) was on average R = 0.56 +/- 0.28, but appeared highly dependent on the wetness of the tampon (preferably with saline) and the tissue contact of the catheters. Correlations were strong (R approximately 0.85-0.93) when thermal contact was good, but much weaker (R approximately 0.14-0.48) for cases with poor thermal contact. CONCLUSION: Good correlations between measurements and calculations were found when tissue contact of the catheters was good. The main difficulties for accurate verification were of clinical nature, arising from improper use of the gynaecological tampon. Poor thermal contact between thermocouples and tissue caused measurement artefacts that were difficult to correlate with calculations.