Radiographers' assessment of referrals for CT and MR imaging using a web-based data collection tool.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited research related to the radiographers' role in assessing of radiology referrals to justify imaging. This study investigated radiographers' compliance with guidelines in the assessment of CT and MRI referrals and factors that influenced their performance. METHODS: This research was facilitated by the EFRS Research Hub at ECR 2019. Five radiology referral scenarios for CT and/or MRI were distributed to radiographers, as determined by their scope of practice, who volunteered at the Research Hub. A web-based data collection tool was used. The radiographers were required to determine the appropriateness of each referral, highlight any concerns and recommend suitable investigations if applicable. Linear regression analysis was used to determine whether postgraduate qualification, grade/role of the radiographer and use of guidelines influenced the radiographers' performance in assessing the referrals. RESULTS: Participants originated from 24 countries (n = 51 CT, n = 40 MRI), the majority originating from the UK, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Norway and Austria. Responses consistent with guidelines were 58% and 57% for CT and MRI, respectively. Possession of an MSc qualification in CT was a significant factor of influence for a higher consistency with guidelines (p = 0.02) in CT. Employment as a radiographer in a lead professional role and/or educator was a significant factor of influence for a higher consistency with guidelines in MRI (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: A total of 58% for CT and 57% for MRI of the radiographers' responses complied with guidelines. Factors such as postgraduate education and leading professional roles are associated with better performance. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Considering qualifications, experience and managerial role is vital before radiographers are delegated task of justifying CT and MR Imaging.

The use of 80 kV versus 100 kV in pulmonary CT angiography: An evaluation of the impact on radiation dose and image quality on two CT scanners.

INTRODUCTION: Use of CT in the investigation of pulmonary embolism in radiosensitive patients such as pregnant and young female patients entails the need for protocol optimization. The aim of this study was to analyze the dose reduction and image quality achieved by using 80 kV instead of 100 kV in CT pulmonary angiography protocols. METHODS: 80 examinations of non-obese patients were analyzed (40 consecutive patients for each protocol, equally distributed on two CT scanners). Objective image quality was assessed by measurements of HU values (average and standard deviation) in five ROIs in pulmonary arteries and calculations of signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). Subjective image quality was independently evaluated by two radiologists in terms of perceived noise, sharp reproduction of pulmonary arteries and overall diagnostic quality. Radiation dose parameters (CTDIvol, DLP, SSDE and effective dose) and effective risk were compared. Differences in radiation dose and objective measures of image quality for the two protocols were assessed using the independent t test; comparison of subjective grading of image quality was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Use of 80 kV significantly increased both arterial contrast enhancement and image noise. Differences in SNR and CNR between protocols were not statistically significant. Achieved dose reduction by using 80 kV was significant on both scanners (SSDE reduction 35% and 46%, p < 0.001; effective dose reduction 40% and 53%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Use of 80 kV protocols for CT examinations of pulmonary arteries in non-obese patients with bodyweight below 80 kg results in significant reduction of radiation doses without compromising image quality.

New diagnostic reference level for full-field digital mammography units.

The diagnostic reference level (DRL) has generally been defined as the 75th percentile of the distributions of mean doses observed on a sample of standard-sized patients, but for mammography, the 95th percentile has been used. In this study, the 75th and 95th percentiles are estimated for 26 full-field digital mammography units, representing six models from four manufacturers. Systematic differences between categories of manufacture/models are investigated with respect to mean glandular dose (MGD) and figure of merit (FOM), defined as signal difference to noise ratio squared divided by the MGD. The MGDs per unit range from 0.7 to 2.1 mGy, with overall 75th and 95th percentiles of 1.4 and 2.0 mGy, respectively. The different manufacture/models show differences in both dose distributions and FOMs. As national DRL, the 95th percentile is proposed to determine which units can be accepted for use. To identify the need for optimisation, it is proposed to use the 75th percentile for the different manufacture/models, along with the FOM.

Uncertainties involved in the estimation of mean glandular dose for women in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP).

The aim of this study was to reflect on the estimation of the mean glandular dose for women in Norway aged 50-69 y. Estimation of mean glandular dose (MGD) has been conducted by applying the method of Dance et al. (1990, 2000, 2009). Uncertainties in the thickness of approximately ±10 mm adds uncertainties in the MGD of approximately ±10 %, and uncertainty in the glandularity of ±0 % will lead to an uncertainty in the MGD of ±4 %. However, the inherent uncertainty in the air kerma, given by the European protocol on dosimetry, will add an uncertainty of 12 %. The total uncertainty in the MGD is estimated to be ∼20 %, taking into consideration uncertainties in compressed breast thickness (±10 %), the air kerma (12 %), change in HVL by -0.05 mm (-9.0 %), uncertainty in the s-factor of ±2.1 % and changing the glandularity to an age-dependent glandularity distribution (+8.4 %).

Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programme.

The aim of this study was to compare mean glandular dose (MGD) in all full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and screen film mammography (SFM) systems used in a national mammography screening program. MGD from 31 screening units (7 FFDM and 24 SFM), based on an average of 50 women at each screening unit, representing 12 X-ray models (6 FFDM and 6 SFM) from five different manufacturers were calculated. The MGD was significantly lower for FFDM compared with SFM (craniocaudal): 1.19 versus 1.27 mGy, respectively, mediolateral oblique: 1.33 versus 1.45 mGy, respectively), but not all of the FFDM units provided lower doses than the SFM units. Comparing FFDMs, the photon counting scanning-slit technology provides significantly lower MGDs than direct and indirect conversion digital technology. The choice of target/filter combination influences the MGD, and has to be optimised with regard to breast thickness.

Reduction in dose from CT examinations of liver lesions with a new postprocessing filter: a ROC phantom study.

BACKGROUND: It is desirable to lower the dose from computed tomography (CT) examinations as much as possible without reducing diagnostic performance. Mathematical postprocessing filters are one tool to achieve dose reduction. PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibilities of reducing CT doses from liver examinations using a new postprocessing filter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic upper-abdomen phantom was used in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies of the detectability of liver lesions. A standard abdominal CT protocol was used. Only mA settings were changed; all other scan parameters were constant. The postprocessing filter used was SharpView CT, which provides context-controlled restoration of digital images using adaptive filters. Six readers were given a set of 10 images obtained at five different dose levels, each image with 32 predefined areas to be evaluated on a five-point scale. In total, 1920 areas were evaluated. At each dose level, the readers evaluated five images without enhancement and five images based on postprocessing filters. All images were randomized with respect to dose level. RESULTS: The postprocessing filter improved the diagnostic performance significantly compared to the unenhanced images at all dose levels. Radiation dose for abdominal CT examinations of liver lesions in the range 2-7 mm was reduced by 30% using postprocessing filters, while diagnostic performance of the examination was maintained or even improved. CONCLUSION: This study indicates great potential for lowering doses for CT examinations of liver lesions using the new postprocessing filter. The software must be fully tested clinically to reliably assess the benefits of this filtration.

A Nordic survey of patient doses in diagnostic radiology.

The aim of this study was to test the applicability of the guidance levels for patient doses cooperatively set by the radiation protection authorities in the five Nordic countries. The kerma-area product (KAP) for five conventional radiological examination types was obtained from several hospitals in each of the Nordic countries. The number of radiographic images and fluoroscopy time were also registered, and the mean values for each examination type and hospital were established based on a representative number of patients (40-100 kg). The results indicate that the situation is very similar in the five Nordic countries, even though some differences were identified. Most of the hospitals demonstrated lower doses than the proposed guidance levels for chest, probably explained by use of faster film/screen combinations during the past decade. An increased use of fluoroscopy for positioning was observed for radiographic examinations of lumbar spine and urography. Large variations in patient doses were found for barium enema depending on the use of fluorospot or 100-mm camera vs full-format film, the range in fluoroscopy times, dose rate, and field size. The guidance levels for lumbar spine (10 Gy x cm2), pelvis (4 Gy x cm2), urography (20 Gy x cm2), and barium enema (50 Gy x cm2) seem to reflect the present quality of X-ray equipment and examination techniques in the Nordic countries. The guidance levels for chest (1 Gy x cm2) should be lowered to 0.6 Gy x cm2.

An anthropomorphic phantom for receiver operating characteristic studies in CT imaging of liver lesions.

The purpose of the study was to develop a methodology that allowed quantitative assessment of image quality in CT and its relationship to dose. An anthropomorphic phantom was designed for use in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies of the detectability of liver lesions with CT. The lesions were simulated by different mixtures of glycerol and water that were filled into holes of different diameters in a liver tissue substitute. A pilot study was carried out on five different scanners that were operated at various exposure settings. A positive correlation was demonstrated for each of the scanners between the weighted CT dose index (CTDIW) and the area under the ROC curve. For the exposure settings used in the clinical routine in the five laboratories, the CTDIW ranged from 15 to 31 mGy. Three observers who read the corresponding set of five phantom images agreed, as judged from the areas under the ROC curves, that there was a marked difference in quality between the three best images and the other two. The two newest scanners in the study had the lowest CTDIW, and at the same time the best ROC results. The phantom and the ROC methodology may, with a set of suggested improvements, be used for comparison of the performance in different CT laboratories, and to establish the dose needed to ensure adequate image quality for a particular scanner.