Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bol. méd. Hosp. Infant. Méx ; 68(2): 130-137, mar.-abr. 2011. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-700904

RESUMO

La oncocercosis es la segunda causa de ceguera a escala mundial, después del tracoma, según la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Fue descubierta en América por Rodolfo Robles en Guatemala, en 1915 (enfermedad de Robles); en 1923 en Chiapas y en 1926 en Oaxaca, México. En 1930 se estableció el programa para su control; es el más antiguo del país y ha realizado trabajos ininterrumpidamente hasta la fecha. Se pueden describir tres grandes etapas del programa para el control de la oncocercosis: a) de 1930-1946 se llevó a cabo la lucha antilarvaria con creolina, la eliminación de larvas de las corrientes de agua y la extirpación de nódulos; b) la administración de la dietilcarbamazina en 1947, la extirpación de nódulos y la aplicación de DDT en 1952; y c) en 1993 la eliminación de la enfermedad con el tratamiento con ivermectina y la extirpación de nódulos. Hasta 1980 se observaba una notificación promedio de 20 mil casos anuales pero, a partir de 1993, al iniciar la administración de ivermectina en dos rondas anuales, se redujo a menos de 100 casos nuevos por año para finales del año 2000 y se eliminó la transmisión en dos focos (en el norte de Oaxaca y en Chamula, en Chiapas), aunque todavía permanece en uno (en Soconusco, Chiapas). En el presente artículo nos referimos a la lucha, durante los últimos 17 años, en contra de la oncocercosis y qué nos permite suponer que, en breve, podrá ser erradicada del país.


According to the World Health Organization, onchocerciasis is the second cause of global blindness after trachoma. It was first discovered in America by Rodolfo Robles in Guatemala in 1915 (Robles's disease); in Chiapas, Mexico in 1923; and in Oaxaca in 1926. In 1930, the first control program was established in Mexico that, to date, has worked uninterruptedly. Three stages of the program can be described: a) from 1930-1946 the antilarvae campaign with creolin was carried out along with the elimination of larvae from water and the removal of nodules; (b) administration of diethylcarbamazine in 1947, removal of nodules and application of DDT in 1952; and c) in 1993 the elimination of the disease with ivermectin treatment and the removal of nodules. Until 1980, an average of 20,000 cases have been reported each year. Since 1993, with the initiation of the administration of ivermectin in two annual doses, the incidence was reduced to <100 new cases per year by the end of 2000 and the transmission in two foci (northern Oaxaca and in Chamula in Chiapas) has been deleted, with one remaining in Soconusco, Chiapas. In this article, we report on the campaign against river blindness during the past 17 years and why we assume that, in brief, this disease can be eliminated in Mexico.

2.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 206(4-5): 387-94, 2003 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12971694

RESUMO

The success of regional networks to provide incentives and mechanisms for sharing information is illustrated through the North American Regional Action Plan on DDT (NARAP). This NARAP was designed to reduce human and environmental exposure to DDT and its metabolites in North America through cooperative efforts. The increasing role of environmental concerns in the planning and design of Mexico's DDT phase-out program motivated the Mexican Ministry of Health to undertake an alternative program for malaria control maximizing community participation without negatively affecting human and ecosystem health. This program relies on: 1) elimination of parasites in people, 2) improvement of personal and household hygiene, and 3) use of environmental management practices to eliminate mosquito breeding sites. This new strategy resulted in the elimination of DDT for malaria control in Mexico in the year 2000. While malaria and its corresponding vectors show considerable variability within a single country and certainly around the globe, the case example of Mexico provides a methodology for developing alternatives to DDT.


Assuntos
Cooperação Internacional , Malária/prevenção & controle , Controle de Mosquitos/métodos , Animais , Anopheles/patogenicidade , Antimaláricos/administração & dosagem , Canadá , Cloroquina/administração & dosagem , Análise Custo-Benefício , DDT/intoxicação , DDT/provisão & distribuição , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Higiene , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Malation , México , Controle de Mosquitos/economia , Primaquina/administração & dosagem , Administração em Saúde Pública , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...