Improvements in Irritative Versus Obstructive Symptoms of the International Prostate Symptom Score After Prostatic Artery Embolization in 174 Patients, in a Single Center.

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the improvements in irritative versus obstructive symptoms of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, 186 patients underwent PAE in a single center and 174 patients were retrospectively selected. The inclusion criteria were symptoms due to BPH, refractory to pharmacological treatment and IPSS ≥ 8. The mean age of the patients was 63.7 ± 7.2 years, the mean prostate volume 89.5 ± 42.5 cm3, and the mean IPSS 19.0 ± 6.2 points. Patient data were reviewed at baseline, 3, 12 and 24 months and compared using the ANOVA mixed models and the Tukey's multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Obstructive subscores dropped more significantly than irritative subscores (p < 0.0001). The mean decrease in each IPSS item was frequency 2.4 (83%); urgency 0.8 (87%); nocturia 1.3 (49%); incomplete emptying 2.6 (83%); intermittency 2.3 (91%); weak stream 2.9 (82%); straining 1.6 (91%). The area under the curve for baseline obstructive scores was 0.7 (p = 0.006) and 0.59 (p = 0.182) for irritative scores. The most common BPH clinical manifestations include irritative and/or obstructive symptoms, the latter usually more prevalent. The IPSS drop observed after PAE suggests that it acts predominantly over obstructive symptoms (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Although a predominant improvement in obstructive symptoms may be observed after PAE, nocturia complaints may require special attention. The severity of baseline obstructive symptoms may significantly predict clinical outcomes.

Anomalous origin of coronary arteries with an interarterial course: pictorial essay.

Coronary arteries originating from the contralateral (noncoronary) sinus and having an interarterial course, in which they run from the ascending aorta to the pulmonary trunk, is a potentially fatal anomaly. Computed tomography (CT) angiography facilitates the recognition and therapeutic planning of such anomalies because of its ability to acquire high-resolution images of the entire course of the coronary artery, as well as of the accompanying atherosclerotic involvement. The right coronary artery originating from the left coronary sinus is the most prevalent anomaly of this type and usually implies a better prognosis, the interarterial course being classified as "high" or "low", depending on whether it is above or below the level of the pulmonary valve, with consequent stratification of the risk and the treatment. However, it is known that there is a high risk of sudden death among patients with a left coronary artery of anomalous origin from the right sinus. In such cases, surgical treatment is recommended, regardless of whether there are symptoms or evidence of ischemia. Given the importance of those aspects, which can be identified on CT of the chest or CT angiography of the aorta, this pictorial essay aims to illustrate such anomalies to facilitate their recognition and description by radiologists who are not specialists in cardiac imaging.

O trajeto interarterial das artérias coronárias com origem em seio contralateral/não coronariano é uma anomalia potencialmente fatal caracterizada pelo trajeto das coronárias entre a aorta ascendente e o tronco da artéria pulmonar. A angiotomografia auxilia no reconhecimento e planejamento terapêutico dessas alterações, em virtude da sua capacidade em adquirir imagens de alta resolução de todo o trajeto coronariano, assim como do envolvimento aterosclerótico associado. A artéria coronária direita originada no seio coronariano esquerdo costuma ser mais prevalente e relacionada a um melhor prognóstico, sendo classificada em curso interarterial "alto" ou "baixo" de acordo com a altura do seu trajeto em relação à valva pulmonar, com consequente estratificação de risco e tratamento distintos. Sabe-se, entretanto, que há um elevado risco de morte súbita entre pacientes com artéria coronária esquerda de origem anômala a partir do seio direito, sendo recomendado tratamento cirúrgico, independentemente de sintomas ou evidência de isquemia. Em razão da importância desses achados que podem ser encontrados em exames de tomografia de tórax e angiotomografias de aorta, o presente ensaio tem por objetivo ilustrar as anomalias de trajeto das artérias coronárias, para facilitar seu reconhecimento e sua descrição por médicos radiologistas não especialistas em imagem cardíaca.

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: review of the latest American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification.

The diagnosis of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) involves a multidisciplinary scenario in which the radiologist assumes a key role. The latest (2013) update of the IIP classification by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society proposed some important changes to the original classification of 2002. The novelties include the addition of a new disease (idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis) and the subdivision of the IIPs into four main groups: chronic fibrosing IIPs (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia); smoking-related IIPs (desquamative interstitial pneumonia and respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease); acute or subacute IIPs (cryptogenic organizing pneumonia and acute interstitial pneumonia); rare IIPs (lymphoid interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis); and the so-called "unclassifiable" IIPs. In this study, we review the main clinical, tomographic, and pathological characteristics of each IIP.

ResumoO diagnóstico das pneumonias intersticiais idiopáticas (PIIs) envolve um cenário multidisciplinar no qual o radiologista assume papel fundamental. A última atualização (2013) da classificação das PIIs pela American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society propõe algumas mudanças importantes em relação à classificação original de 2002. Dentre as novidades, destacam-se o acréscimo de uma nova doença (fibroelastose pleuroparenquimatosa idiopática) e a subdivisão das PIIs em quatro grupos principais: PIIs crônicas fibrosantes (fibrose pulmonar idiopática e pneumonia intersticial não específica); PIIs relacionadas ao tabagismo (pneumonia intersticial descamativa e bronquiolite respiratória com doença intersticial pulmonar); PIIs agudas/subagudas (pneumonia em organização e pneumonia intersticial aguda); PIIs raras (pneumonia intersticial linfocítica e fibroelastose pleuroparenquimatosa idiopática); além das ditas "inclassificáveis". Foram revisadas, de forma didática neste estudo, as principais características clínicas, tomográficas e patológicas de cada uma das PIIs.

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: review of the latest American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification / Pneumonias intersticiais idiopáticas: revisão da última classificação da American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society

Abstract The diagnosis of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) involves a multidisciplinary scenario in which the radiologist assumes a key role. The latest (2013) update of the IIP classification by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society proposed some important changes to the original classification of 2002. The novelties include the addition of a new disease (idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis) and the subdivision of the IIPs into four main groups: chronic fibrosing IIPs (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia); smoking-related IIPs (desquamative interstitial pneumonia and respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease); acute or subacute IIPs (cryptogenic organizing pneumonia and acute interstitial pneumonia); rare IIPs (lymphoid interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis); and the so-called "unclassifiable" IIPs. In this study, we review the main clinical, tomographic, and pathological characteristics of each IIP.

Resumo O diagnóstico das pneumonias intersticiais idiopáticas (PIIs) envolve um cenário multidisciplinar no qual o radiologista assume papel fundamental. A última atualização (2013) da classificação das PIIs pela American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society propõe algumas mudanças importantes em relação à classificação original de 2002. Dentre as novidades, destacam-se o acréscimo de uma nova doença (fibroelastose pleuroparenquimatosa idiopática) e a subdivisão das PIIs em quatro grupos principais: PIIs crônicas fibrosantes (fibrose pulmonar idiopática e pneumonia intersticial não específica); PIIs relacionadas ao tabagismo (pneumonia intersticial descamativa e bronquiolite respiratória com doença intersticial pulmonar); PIIs agudas/subagudas (pneumonia em organização e pneumonia intersticial aguda); PIIs raras (pneumonia intersticial linfocítica e fibroelastose pleuroparenquimatosa idiopática); além das ditas "inclassificáveis". Foram revisadas, de forma didática neste estudo, as principais características clínicas, tomográficas e patológicas de cada uma das PIIs.

Comparação entre dois sistemas de análise de topografia corneana / Comparison between two analysis systems of corneal topography

OBJETIVO: Comparar os dados topográficos de pacientes com ceratocone entre os sistemas de avaliação: Orbscan IIz® (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) e Wavetek Chroma®. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados em 29 pacientes com diagnóstico clínico e topográfico de ceratocone atendidos no Hospital Oftalmológico de Sorocaba em março de 2010. Para a comparação dos dados foram avaliados os índices dióptricos dos meridianos mais curvo e mais plano (Sim K) a 3 mm e 5 mm centrais da córnea e ceratometria máxima através dos topógrafos Orbscan IIz® e Wavetek Chroma®. RESULTADOS: Foram realizados exames em 58 olhos de 29 pacientes com ceratocone. Na avaliação da ceratometria máxima, o Orbscan IIz® registrou 79,31% olhos e o Wavetek Chroma® conseguiu captura em 100%. Nas áreas mais curvas, mais planas e suas médias a 5 mm do centro corneano, ocorreu diferença estatisticamente significante apenas na primeira variável (intervalo de confiança de 95%: -0,51 a -2,46, p=0,004), sendo que no Orbscan IIz® a ceratometria foi de 46,91 (desvio padrão: 2,92), enquanto que no Wavetek Chroma® foi 48,4 (desvio padrão: 4,48). CONCLUSÃO: O novo aparelho Wavetek Chroma® pode auxiliar na obtenção da imagem topográfica de pacientes com ceratocone quando não for possível com o Orbscan IIz® na medida da ceratometria máxima, meridiano mais plano e média a 5mm do centro corneano.

PURPOSE: To compare topographic features of patients with keratoconus between two systems: Orbscan IIz® (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) and Wavetek Chroma®. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients that were diagnosed with keratoconus based on clinical and topographic characteristics were evaluated on their visit to Ophthalmology Hospital of Sorocaba in March 2010. Topographic variables, like maximum and minimum keratometric readings (Sim K) within 3 and 5 mm of central zone, and maximum keratometry, were analyzed by Orbscan IIz® and Wavetek Chroma®. RESULTS: A total of 58 eyes of 29 patients with keratoconus were enrolled in this study. Considering maximum keratometry, Orbscan IIz® registered 79.31% eyes whrereas Wavetek Chroma® 100%. Analysing maximum and minimum keratometric readings and average at 5mm of central zone occurred a statistically significant difference at the first parameter (95% confidence limits: -0.51 to -2.46, p=0.004), the keratometric reading by Orbscan IIz® was 46.91 (standard deviation: 2.92), whereas Wavetek Chroma® was 48,4 (standard deviation: 4.48). CONCLUSION: The new instrument Wavetek Chroma® could help to map topographically eyes with keratoconus which could not be measured using the Orbscan IIz® at maximum keratometry, minimum keratometric and average reading at 5 mm of central zone.