Chest X-ray in suspected lung cancer is harmful.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the use of the chest radiograph (CXR) as the first-line investigation in primary care patients with suspected lung cancer. METHODS: Of 16,945 primary care referral CXRs (June 2018 to May 2019), 1,488 were referred for suspected lung cancer. CXRs were coded as follows: CX1, normal but a CT scan is recommended to exclude malignancy; CX2, alternative diagnosis; or CX3, suspicious for cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was undertaken by stratifying patients according to their CX code. RESULTS: In the study period, there were 101 lung cancer diagnoses via a primary care CXR pathway. Only 10% of patients with a normal CXR (CX1) underwent subsequent CT and there was a significant delay in lung cancer diagnosis in these patients (p < 0.001). Lung cancer was diagnosed at an advanced stage in 50% of CX1 patients, 38% of CX2 patients and 57% of CX3 patients (p = 0.26). There was no survival difference between CX codes (p = 0.42). CONCLUSION: Chest radiography in the investigation of patients with suspected lung cancer may be harmful. This strategy may falsely reassure in the case of a normal CXR and prioritises resources to advanced disease. KEY POINTS: • Half of all lung cancer diagnoses in a 1-year period are first investigated with a chest X-ray. • A normal chest X-ray report leads to a significant delay in the diagnosis of lung cancer. • The majority of patients with a normal or abnormal chest X-ray have advanced disease at diagnosis and there is no difference in survival outcomes based on the chest X-ray findings.

Does laser ablation prostatectomy lead to oncological compromise?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and outcome of incidental prostate cancer detected at transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and to evaluate whether laser ablation prostatectomy would miss significant cancer by failing to provide tissue for histopathological analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Information on TURP-detected prostate cancer was gathered from 1996 to 2006, from The South-west Cancer Intelligence Service, hospital-operating and coding records, histopathology databases and The British Association of Urological Surgeons Cancer Registry. We recorded the total number of prostate cancers diagnosed per year, number of TURPs performed, Gleason scores and patients outcomes. RESULTS: TURP-detected prostate cancer has declined since the relatively high rates (22%) recorded locally in 1996-97. Between 2001 and 2006, a mean (range) of 124 (111-135) prostate cancers were detected per year. Incidental cancers accounted for only 1.5-5.6% of all newly diagnosed prostate cancers per year. Incidental cancers had a mean (sem) Gleason score of 5.7 (0.3) compared to 8.0 (0.3) in known cancers (P < 0.01) undergoing TURP. Of newly diagnosed patients, 82% were allocated to active surveillance, whilst 18% were started on hormone therapy, with no prostate cancer-related deaths over a mean (sem, range) follow-up of 49.7 (2.4, 11-81) months. CONCLUSIONS: TURP mainly samples transitional-zone tissue where tumours are relatively uncommon, and have a good prognosis. Our series of incidental TURP-detected cancers showed an incidence in keeping with published data, and favourable histological and clinical outcomes. We suggest the lack of tissue should not discourage the use of laser prostatectomy surgery.

In the wake of structural adjustment programs: Exploring the relationship between domestic policies and health outcomes in Argentina and Uruguay.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of structural adjustment programs (SAPs) in developing countries has been followed by a marked reduction in their progress on economic growth, health outcomes, and social indicators. Comprehensive and contextualized explorations of the effects of SAPs are needed to assist health and social policy-makers in better determining responses to such programs that continue to dominate global trade, aid and debt cancellation negotiations. METHODS: A comparative case study of Argentina and Uruguay was developed exploring the effects of SAPs on health. Using a framework developed to analyze the relationship between globalization and health, changes in domestic policies resulting from SAPs and the corresponding economic, social and health outcomes of the countries were explored. RESULTS: In general, SAPs were implemented with greater severity and speed in Argentina than in Uruguay, with the greatest differences occurring over the 1980s. The more gradual and modest reforms implemented in Uruguay were associated with better economic, social and health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support those of previous studies demonstrating that countries that have maintained more dynamic public social and health programming while applying SAPs have been better able to protect the health of the most vulnerable sectors of society.