Treatment of femoral pseudoaneurysms. Percutaneous US-guided thrombin injection versus US-guided compression.

PURPOSE: Thrombin injection in femoral pseudoaneurysms has been suggested to be superior to traditional US-guided compression. Our aim was to evaluate results with compression therapy with special reference to use of thrombin in case of failure. We also studied 7 patients who underwent primary thrombin injection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all (n=44) femoral artery pseudoaneurysms diagnosed at our department during October 1998-May 1999. US-guided compression with the Femostop device or US-guided thrombin injection (100-1000 IU) was the first choice according to the physicians' preference, followed by the other regime if the first choice was non-successful. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (89%) of the patients received anticoagulation treatment and/or concomitant antiplatelet drugs. Out of the 44 patients, 37 were treated with compression as the first choice. This regime was successful in 22 (59%). This group included 2 lesions that resolved spontaneously after initially failed compression and 1 deep venous thrombosis after treatment. The persistent 15 pseudoaneurysms after failed compression received thrombin injection, and it was also the primary therapy in 7 patients. Complete thrombosis within the pseudoaneurysm was immediately induced after treatment. One early recurrence required a second injection. No complication of thrombin was noted and no surgery was required. CONCLUSION: US-guided thrombin injection is an effective treatment for embolisation of pseudoaneurysms. The technique is superior to compression therapy.

Comparison of various D-dimer tests for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.

Analyses of D-dimers in plasma are frequently used as diagnostic tools for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered to be the method of choice for quantitative assays, but are time consuming. Therefore, we have assessed plasma levels of D-dimers in patients with clinically suspected DVT using quantitative (Asserachrom D-Di ELISA and TintElize), semiquantitative (Minutex latex, D-Di latex, NycoCard D-Dimer) and qualitative (INSTANT.I.A) assays. Phlebography was used as the gold standard to verify or exclude the suspected diagnosis. We conclude that the fast assays, INSTANT.I.A and Minutex, have essentially the same negative predictive value [91% and 89%, respectively, using a cut-off value < 0.5 mg/l fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU)] for excluding DVT as the Asserachrom D-Di ELISA and TintElize tests (92%). The D-Di Latex assay had a negative predictive value of 82% (cut-off < 0.5 mg/l FEU) and turned out to be less useful in our material. The NycoCard D-dimer assay had a negative predictive value of 100% when using the cut-off value < 0.5 mg/l FEU, but this was substantially lower when the cut-off was changed to < or = 0.5 mg/l. Thus, we conclude that several fast tests offer a simpler and more rapid way of determining plasma levels of D-dimer than conventional ELISA methods without loss of clinical usefulness in excluding DVT.

Digital chest radiography--comparing two types of CRT monitors in a ROC experiment with a chest phantom.

Two principally different 1000-line CRT (cathode ray tube) monitors connected to a digital image intensifier system for chest radiography were compared in terms of image quality and viewing comfort. Image quality was assessed by means of ROC analysis. Five observers tried to find simulated pathology positioned over the lungs and the mediastinum of an anthropomorphic phantom. The observers also graded the viewing comfort of the two CRTs in terms of flicker, light levels, and general comfort. No significant difference in the detection of simulated pathology was demonstrated between the two monitors. A slight preference for the newer CRT (Imlogix) was seen as compared to the older standard CRT (Siemens) regarding flicker and general comfort.