Prevalence, clinical spectrum and atypical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in Argentina: a nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Population-based data on gastro-oesophageal reflux in Latin America are lacking. AIM: To assess gastro-oesophageal reflux symptom prevalence, clinical spectrum and association with the atypical symptoms in our country. METHODS: Gastro-oesophageal reflux self-report questionnaires validated at Mayo Clinic, USA, were submitted to a sample of 1000 residents (aged 18-80 years) from 17 representative geographical areas of Argentina. The samples were selected and stratified according to age, gender, geographical areas and size of town of residence provided by the Argentine Bureau of Statistics and Census. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of any typical gastro-oesophageal reflux symptom experienced in the previous year was 61.2% (95% CI, 57.9-64.6), the prevalence of frequent gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms was 23.0% (95% CI, 20.1-25.9) and the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was 11.9% (95% CI, 9.6-14.1). Frequent gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms were associated with dysphagia (OR 2.12, 95% CI, 1.27-3.54, P < 0.01), globus (OR 2.22, 95% CI, 1.35-3.66, P < 0.01) and non-cardiac chest pain (OR 1.55, 95% CI, 1.04-2.31, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In Argentina, typical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux are highly prevalent at the national level, and frequent gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms are significantly associated with dysphagia, globus and non-cardiac chest pain.

Seroprevalencia de Helicobacter pylori en hemodializados

AIM: (a) to establish Hp infection seroprevalence among patients under chronic dialysis and to compare it with that of general population, (b) to assess the relationship between Hp prevalence and parameters associated with a higher morbidity, such as serum albumin levels, dialysis adequacy, and quality of life in this population. METHODS: Ninety-three consecutive patients of both genders (58 M/35 F), X 57.5 +/- 17.2 years old, with end-stage chronic renal failure on maintenance dialysis were included. All of them received dialysis at Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires. The presence of anti-Hp antibodies was established and its prevalence was compared with a control group. In all cases, serum albumin levels and time in dialysis were determined. In addition, dialysis adequacy was established by KT/V and quality of life was measured with Karnofsky's index. Patients and controls were matched according variables associated with Hp infection in our country, i.e., age, socioeconomic and education levels. RESULTS: Ninety-three dialysis patients were matched with 93 controls. According to the quick serological test, 44 out of 93 (47.3%) dialyzed patients and 55 out of 93 (53.6%) controls were Hp positive (ns). Forty-one out of 76 patients (53.9%) with a serum albumin level 3.5 g/dl and 3/17 (17.6%) with a serum albumin level < 3.5 g/dl were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.39; p < 0.01). Fifty-five out of 80 patients (69.2%) with Kt/V > 1.2 and 6/13 (43.8%) with Kt/V 1.2 Pounds were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.65; p < 0.05). Four out of 15 patients (26.7%) with Karnofsky's index > 70, and 40/78 (51.3%) with Karnofsky's index < or = 70 were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.06-2.95, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: According to our results, dialysis patients do no represent a high-risk group of Hp infection. Those individuals with higher morbidity and mortality rates as evidenced by low serum albumin levels or by a low Kt/V have a lower Hp prevalence, perhaps due to a poor immune response o due to the use of antibiotics. Therefore, Hp infection screening en dialysis units does not differ from the guidelines developed in Maastrich for the general population.

Seroprevalencia de Helicobacter pylori en hemodializados / xxx

AIM: (a) to establish Hp infection seroprevalence among patients under chronic dialysis and to compare it with that of general population, (b) to assess the relationship between Hp prevalence and parameters associated with a higher morbidity, such as serum albumin levels, dialysis adequacy, and quality of life in this population. METHODS: Ninety-three consecutive patients of both genders (58 M/35 F), X 57.5 +/- 17.2 years old, with end-stage chronic renal failure on maintenance dialysis were included. All of them received dialysis at Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires. The presence of anti-Hp antibodies was established and its prevalence was compared with a control group. In all cases, serum albumin levels and time in dialysis were determined. In addition, dialysis adequacy was established by KT/V and quality of life was measured with Karnofskys index. Patients and controls were matched according variables associated with Hp infection in our country, i.e., age, socioeconomic and education levels. RESULTS: Ninety-three dialysis patients were matched with 93 controls. According to the quick serological test, 44 out of 93 (47.3%) dialyzed patients and 55 out of 93 (53.6%) controls were Hp positive (ns). Forty-one out of 76 patients (53.9%) with a serum albumin level 3.5 g/dl and 3/17 (17.6%) with a serum albumin level < 3.5 g/dl were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.39; p < 0.01). Fifty-five out of 80 patients (69.2%) with Kt/V > 1.2 and 6/13 (43.8%) with Kt/V 1.2 Pounds were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.65; p < 0.05). Four out of 15 patients (26.7%) with Karnofskys index > 70, and 40/78 (51.3%) with Karnofskys index < or = 70 were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.06-2.95, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: According to our results, dialysis patients do no represent a high-risk group of Hp infection. Those individuals with higher morbidity and mortality rates as evidenced by low serum albumin levels or by a low Kt/V have a lower Hp prevalence, perhaps due to a poor immune response o due to the use of antibiotics. Therefore, Hp infection screening en dialysis units does not differ from the guidelines developed in Maastrich for the general population. (AU)

[Helicobacter pylori seroprevalence in dialysis patients]. / Seroprevalencia de Helicobacter pylori en hemodializados.

AIM: (a) to establish Hp infection seroprevalence among patients under chronic dialysis and to compare it with that of general population, (b) to assess the relationship between Hp prevalence and parameters associated with a higher morbidity, such as serum albumin levels, dialysis adequacy, and quality of life in this population. METHODS: Ninety-three consecutive patients of both genders (58 M/35 F), X 57.5 +/- 17.2 years old, with end-stage chronic renal failure on maintenance dialysis were included. All of them received dialysis at Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires. The presence of anti-Hp antibodies was established and its prevalence was compared with a control group. In all cases, serum albumin levels and time in dialysis were determined. In addition, dialysis adequacy was established by KT/V and quality of life was measured with Karnofsky's index. Patients and controls were matched according variables associated with Hp infection in our country, i.e., age, socioeconomic and education levels. RESULTS: Ninety-three dialysis patients were matched with 93 controls. According to the quick serological test, 44 out of 93 (47.3%) dialyzed patients and 55 out of 93 (53.6%) controls were Hp positive (ns). Forty-one out of 76 patients (53.9%) with a serum albumin level 3.5 g/dl and 3/17 (17.6%) with a serum albumin level < 3.5 g/dl were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.39; p < 0.01). Fifty-five out of 80 patients (69.2%) with Kt/V > 1.2 and 6/13 (43.8%) with Kt/V 1.2 Pounds were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.65; p < 0.05). Four out of 15 patients (26.7%) with Karnofsky's index > 70, and 40/78 (51.3%) with Karnofsky's index < or = 70 were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.06-2.95, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: According to our results, dialysis patients do no represent a high-risk group of Hp infection. Those individuals with higher morbidity and mortality rates as evidenced by low serum albumin levels or by a low Kt/V have a lower Hp prevalence, perhaps due to a poor immune response o due to the use of antibiotics. Therefore, Hp infection screening en dialysis units does not differ from the guidelines developed in Maastrich for the general population.

Seroprevalencia de Helicobacter pylori en hemodializados. / [Helicobacter pylori seroprevalence in dialysis patients]

AIM: (a) to establish Hp infection seroprevalence among patients under chronic dialysis and to compare it with that of general population, (b) to assess the relationship between Hp prevalence and parameters associated with a higher morbidity, such as serum albumin levels, dialysis adequacy, and quality of life in this population. METHODS: Ninety-three consecutive patients of both genders (58 M/35 F), X 57.5 +/- 17.2 years old, with end-stage chronic renal failure on maintenance dialysis were included. All of them received dialysis at Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires. The presence of anti-Hp antibodies was established and its prevalence was compared with a control group. In all cases, serum albumin levels and time in dialysis were determined. In addition, dialysis adequacy was established by KT/V and quality of life was measured with Karnofskys index. Patients and controls were matched according variables associated with Hp infection in our country, i.e., age, socioeconomic and education levels. RESULTS: Ninety-three dialysis patients were matched with 93 controls. According to the quick serological test, 44 out of 93 (47.3

) dialyzed patients and 55 out of 93 (53.6

) controls were Hp positive (ns). Forty-one out of 76 patients (53.9

) with a serum albumin level 3.5 g/dl and 3/17 (17.6

) with a serum albumin level < 3.5 g/dl were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.06; 95

CI, 0.01-0.39; p < 0.01). Fifty-five out of 80 patients (69.2

) with Kt/V > 1.2 and 6/13 (43.8

) with Kt/V 1.2 Pounds were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.10; 95

CI, 0.02-0.65; p < 0.05). Four out of 15 patients (26.7

) with Karnofskys index > 70, and 40/78 (51.3

) with Karnofskys index < or = 70 were anti-Hp positive (odds ratio, 0.37; 95

CI, 0.06-2.95, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: According to our results, dialysis patients do no represent a high-risk group of Hp infection. Those individuals with higher morbidity and mortality rates as evidenced by low serum albumin levels or by a low Kt/V have a lower Hp prevalence, perhaps due to a poor immune response o due to the use of antibiotics. Therefore, Hp infection screening en dialysis units does not differ from the guidelines developed in Maastrich for the general population.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Argentina: results of a nationwide epidemiologic study. Argentinean Hp Epidemiologic Study Group.

Our aim was to assess the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection in Argentina, in the general population and by age groups, and to determine the value of various epidemiologic variables as predictors of Hp infection. The study comprised 754 subjects (443 women 158.7%], 311 men [41.3%]) from both genders, consecutively recruited from health centers where patients were undergoing routine medical analyses. Average age was 32 +/- 22 years. The pediatric group included subjects < or =18 years of age (n = 261). Stratification was based primarily on climatic factors and secondarily on sanitary and demographic considerations. Hp infection status was assessed through a quick serologic test. The overall Hp infection prevalence in Argentina was 35.7 +/- 3.8%. The age was statistically significant using a multiple regression test (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the socioeconomic (p < 0.05) and educational level (0 < 0.01) in the adults and the water sources (p < 0.01) in the pediatric group were all statistically significant according the multiple regression test. The overall Hp infection prevalence in Argentina was 35.7 +/- 3.8%. Age was a predictor of Hp infection status. There is evidence of low infection prevalence in children. a higher prevalence in adolescents, and a more noticeable increase at 40 years of age. Furthermore, the socioeconomic and educational level in adults and the water sources in the pediatric group explained, in part, the occurrence of Hp infection.