Conjunctivitis in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from five tralokinumab clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Tralokinumab, a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that specifically binds with high affinity to interleukin-13, effectively reduces moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) when given every 2 weeks. The incidence of conjunctivitis is elevated vs. placebo, but severity and aetiology have not been examined. OBJECTIVE: To analyse conjunctivitis data recorded in five randomized, placebo-controlled trials of tralokinumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: Overall, 2285 adults with AD were studied up to 16 weeks. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights were applied to calculate the adjusted incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: The incidence of conjunctivitis was higher (7·5%) with tralokinumab than with placebo (3·2%). Most events were mild or moderate in severity, and 78·6% and 73·9% of events resolved during the trial in the tralokinumab and placebo groups, respectively. Two (1·4%) events led to the permanent discontinuation of tralokinumab. An increased incidence of conjunctivitis, regardless of treatment group, was associated with more severe baseline AD, and history of allergic conjunctivitis/atopic keratoconjunctivitis, as well as the number of atopic comorbidities. LIMITATIONS: This analysis reports events up to week 16 only, with limited confirmation of conjunctivitis and its aetiology by an ophthalmologist, and insufficient reporting of ophthalmic treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tralokinumab was associated with an increased incidence of conjunctivitis vs. placebo, but these cases were mostly mild and transient.

Tralokinumab plus topical corticosteroids for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from the double-blind, randomized, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III ECZTRA 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, a key driver of atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were candidates for systemic therapy. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo plus TCS controlled phase III trial. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to subcutaneous tralokinumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) with TCS as needed over 16 weeks. Patients who achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 and/or 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at week 16 with tralokinumab were rerandomized 1 : 1 to tralokinumab Q2W or every 4 weeks (Q4W), with TCS as needed, for another 16 weeks. RESULTS: At week 16, more patients treated with tralokinumab than with placebo achieved IGA 0/1: 38·9% vs. 26·2% [difference (95% confidence interval): 12·4% (2·9-21·9); P = 0·015] and EASI 75: 56·0% vs. 35·7% [20·2% (9·8-30·6); P < 0·001]. Of the patients who were tralokinumab responders at week 16, 89·6% and 92·5% of those treated with tralokinumab Q2W and 77·6% and 90·8% treated with tralokinumab Q4W maintained an IGA 0/1 and EASI 75 response at week 32, respectively. Among patients who did not achieve IGA 0/1 and EASI 75 with tralokinumab Q2W at 16 weeks, 30·5% and 55·8% achieved these endpoints, respectively, at week 32. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab 300 mg in combination with TCS as needed was effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Treatment effects on residual cognitive symptoms among partially or fully remitted patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blinded, exploratory study with vortioxetine.

BACKGROUND: Residual cognitive symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) are common, yet poorly investigated. We explored the effectiveness of vortioxetine as adjunctive treatment to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and as monotherapy versus continued SSRI, in patients with MDD who achieved full or partial remission with SSRI, but report residual cognitive symptoms. METHODS: Patients (18-65 years old, N =151) diagnosed with MDD, with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-items total score ≤10 and a Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression total score >25, were randomized 1:1:1 to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with current SSRI + placebo, SSRI + vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day), or vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day) + placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measurements. Secondary outcomes comprised cognitive functioning, subjectively-rated cognitive symptoms, patient functioning, and mood symptoms. RESULTS: From baseline to week 8, all treatment groups improved DSST performance, with statistically nonsignificant treatment differences. Similar results were seen for secondary endpoints. Improvement in cognitive performance tended to be numerically larger with vortioxetine monotherapy than with SSRI monotherapy, while vortioxetine as adjunctive treatment tended to perform numerically better in further improving depressive symptoms. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. Nausea was the most common adverse event for vortioxetine. LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes limited statistical power. CONCLUSION: In this explorative study, remitted patients with MDD improved their cognitive performance with no treatment differences. Secondary results indicate numerical benefits for cognitive performance with vortioxetine monotherapy, and for depressive symptoms with vortioxetine augmentation.

Vortioxetine reduces BOLD signal during performance of the N-back working memory task: a randomised neuroimaging trial in remitted depressed patients and healthy controls.

Cognitive dysfunction is common in depression during both acute episodes and remission. Vortioxetine is a novel multimodal antidepressant that has improved cognitive function including executive function in depressed patients in randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials. However, it is unclear whether vortioxetine is able to target directly the neural circuitry implicated in the cognitive deficits in depression. Remitted depressed (n=48) and healthy volunteers (n=48) were randomised to receive 14 days treatment with 20 mg vortioxetine or placebo in a double-blind design. The effects of treatment on functional magnetic resonance imaging responses during an N-back working memory task were assessed at baseline and at the end of treatment. Neuropsychological measures of executive function, speed and information processing, attention and learning and memory were examined with the Trail Making Test (TMT), Rey Auditory Learning Test and Digit Symbol Substitution Test before and after treatment; subjective cognitive function was assessed using the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ). Compared with placebo, vortioxetine reduced activation in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left hippocampus during the N-back task compared with placebo. Vortioxetine also increased TMT-A performance and self-reported cognitive function on the PDQ. These effects were seen across both subject groups. Vortioxetine modulates neural responses across a circuit subserving working memory in a direction opposite to the changes described in depression, when performance is maintained. This study provides evidence that vortioxetine has direct effects on the neural circuitry supporting cognitive function that can be dissociated from its effects on the mood symptoms of depression.

The Effects of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Function in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Management of cognitive deficits in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) remains an important unmet need. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of vortioxetine on cognition in patients with MDD. METHODS: Random effects meta-analysis was applied to three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 8-week trials of vortioxetine (5-20mg/day) in MDD, and separately to two duloxetine-referenced trials. The primary outcome measure was change in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) score. Standardized effect sizes (SES) versus placebo (Cohen's d ) were used as input. Path analysis was employed to determine the extent to which changes in DSST were mediated independently of a change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. Meta-analysis was applied to MADRS-adjusted and -unadjusted SES values. Changes on additional cognitive tests were evaluated (source studies only). RESULTS: Before adjustment for MADRS, vortioxetine separated from placebo on DSST score (SES 0.25-0.48; nominal p < 0.05) in all individual trials, and statistically improved DSST performance versus placebo in meta-analyses of the three trials (SES = 0.35; p < 0.0001) and two duloxetine-referenced trials (SES = 0.26; p = 0.001). After adjustment for MADRS, vortioxetine maintained DSST improvement in one individual trial ( p = 0.001) and separation from placebo was maintained in meta-analyses of all three trials (SES = 0.24; p < 0.0001) and both duloxetine-referenced trials (SES 0.19; p = 0.01). Change in DSST with duloxetine failed to separate from placebo in individual trials and both meta-analyses. Change in DSST statistically favored vortioxetine versus duloxetine after MADRS adjustment (SES = 0.16; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine, but not duloxetine, significantly improved cognition, independent of depressive symptoms. Vortioxetine represents an important treatment for MDD-related cognitive dysfunction.

Tonic immobility in guinea pigs: a behavioural response for detecting an anxiolytic-like effect?

Tonic immobility (TI) is considered to be an innate fear response characterized by a temporary state of profound and reversible motor inhibition. TI occurs in a wide range of species in a predator-prey confrontation and is hypothesized to be a terminal defence response occurring when there is physical contact between prey and predator. The objective of the present study was to investigate the validity of the TI model in guinea pigs for detection of anxiolytic and/or antidepressant drug activity. Compounds that reduced TI include the serotonin (5-HT) releaser fenfluramine, the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and buspirone, the 5-HT(2C/2B) receptor antagonist SB206553, the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist MDL 100.151 -- but only at doses thought also to inhibit 5-HT(2C) receptors--the noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitor desipramine, the benzodiazepine inverse agonist FG-7142, the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine, the neurokinin (NK)(1) receptor antagonist L-733.060, and the NK(2) receptor antagonist SR-48968. Compounds that increased TI include the benzodiazepine agonists diazepam and alprazolam, and the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist clonidine. The selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors citalopram, paroxetine and fluoxetine, the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100.635, the 5-HT(2C) receptor agonist MK-212, the 5-HT/NA reuptake inhibitor imipramine, the NA reuptake inhibitor talopram, the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil, the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist idazoxan and the psychostimulant amphetamine did not have any effect. These findings indicate that the serotonergic, noradrenergic and neurokinin systems are involved in mediating or modulating TI behaviour in guinea pigs. The potential of TI as a behaviour for detecting anxiolytic-like effect may be questioned due to the contradictory effect of the benzodiazepine ligands, which may be attributed to the sedative and/or ataxic effects of the compounds. Nevertheless, there is preclinical evidence suggesting that 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists, 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonists and NK(1) and NK(2) receptor antagonists possess anxiolytic potential. Only when results of clinical investigations of the anxiolytic potential of non-benzodiazepine ligands (for example the NK receptor antagonists) are available, will it be possible to determine fully the predictive validity of the TI model.