Impact of prostate biopsy technique on outcomes of the precision prostatectomy procedure.

Objective: To assess the impact of iterative changes in preoperative and postoperative biopsy techniques on the outcomes of men undergoing the precision prostatectomy procedure. Precision prostatectomy is a novel surgical treatment for prostate cancer that aims to maximally preserve erectogenic nerves via partial preservation of the prostate capsule. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Single tertiary care center. Participants: This study included 120 patients who consented to undergo prostate cancer treatment with the precision prostatectomy procedure. Patients were originally enrolled in one of two separate prospective protocols studying precision prostatectomy. Interventions: Preoperatively, 60 patients were screened with transrectal (TR) biopsy and 60 were screened by transperineal (TP) biopsy. Ultimately, 117 patients underwent precision prostatectomy. Of the 43 postoperative biopsies, 19 were TR; 17 were TP with ultrasound; and 7 were TP with microultrasound (mUS). Main outcome measures: Preoperatively, we evaluated whether the transition to TP biopsy was associated with differences in postoperative treatment failure defined as a neoplasm-positive postoperative biopsy. Postoperative biopsies were compared with respect to their ability to sample the remnant tissue, specifically percentage of cores positive for prostate tissue. Results: Preoperatively, 9/60 (15%) positive postoperative biopsies occurred in the TR group and 6/60 (10%) in the TP group; Kaplan-Meier survival estimates did not differ between groups (p=0.69 by log rank). Postoperatively, the numbers of cores positive for prostate tissue were 99/160 (62%), 63/107 (59%), and 36/39 (92%) in the TR biopsy, TP with ultrasound, and TP with mUS groups, respectively; this difference was statistically significant versus the rate in the TR and standard TP groups (p=0.0003 and 0.0002). Conclusion: We found no significant improvement in patient screening, preoperatively-though limited by small sample size and relatively short follow-up. The incorporation of high-frequency mUS for postoperative biopsies improved the ability to sample the remnant tissue with a higher efficiency.

Robotic Kidney Transplantation with Regional Hypothermia versus Open Kidney Transplantation for Patients with End Stage Renal Disease: An Ideal Stage 2B Study.

PURPOSE: We report on comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional open kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a prospective cohort study of 654 patients who underwent open or robotic kidney transplantation at a single tertiary care hospital between January 2013 and December 2015. Primary outcome was delayed graft function, defined as the need for dialysis within 1 week of surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, pain, graft rejection, and graft and patient survival. Nonparsimonious propensity score and Ding-VanderWeele analytical methods were used to account for confounding bias. RESULTS: Within the 1:3 matched cohort (robotic 126, open 378; well matched with standardized mean difference ∼10%), the robotic approach was associated with lower rates of wound infections (0% vs 4%, p=0.023) and symptomatic lymphoceles (0% vs 7% at 36 months, p=0.003), as well as reduced postoperative pain, requirement for narcotic analgesia and blood loss. There were no differences between the 2 groups, robotic versus open, with respect to graft function (delayed graft function 0% vs 2.4%, p=0.081), hospital stay (median 8 days for both, p=0.647), graft rejection (16.2% vs 18.6% at 36 months, p=0.643), and graft (95.2% vs 96.3% at 36 months, p=0.266) and overall survival (94.5% vs 98.1% at 36 months, p=0.307). Ding-VanderWeele analysis suggested minimal influence of unknown confounders on study findings. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia was associated with a lower rate of postoperative complications and improved patient comfort in comparison to open kidney transplantation. Graft function, and graft and overall survival were comparable between the 2 techniques.

Ten-year disease progression and mortality rates in men who experience biochemical recurrence versus persistence after radical prostatectomy and undergo salvage radiation therapy: A post-hoc analysis of RTOG 9601 trial data.

PURPOSE: To compare local/metastatic disease progression and overall mortality rates in men with node-negative prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy (RP) that experience biochemical recurrence vs. persistence postoperatively and undergo salvage radiation therapy (sRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 760 men who participated in the RTOG 9601 trial were extracted using the NCTN data archive platform. Patients were stratified into biochemical recurrence (nadir-PSA ≤0.4 ng/ml) or persistence (nadir-PSA >0.4 ng/ml) groups, based on the cut-off reported in the original trial. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology was utilized to minimize the baseline differences among groups. Competing-risk and Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated the impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence vs. recurrence on local and metastatic disease progression and overall-mortality in the IPTW-adjusted model; a 2-sided P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: All patients received sRT, and about 50% of the patients in either group received concomitant antiandrogen therapy (P = 0.951). The median follow-up was 12 years. After IPTW, the 2 groups were well-matched with standardized mean differences ∼10%. In the IPTW-adjusted cohort, the 10-year local and metastatic disease occurrence rates were 3.2% vs. 1.4% (Gray's P = 0.0001) and 28.6% vs. 10.1% (Gray's P < 0.0001) in patients with persistent vs. recurrent PSA, respectively. Similarly, the 10-year overall-mortality rates were 24.9% vs. 11.9% (Log-rank P = 0.029), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with biochemical persistence after RP are approximately 2.5 times more likely to experience local/metastatic failure and death, compared to patients with biochemical recurrence after RP, despite equivalent sRT with/without antiandrogen therapy use. These data may facilitate patient counseling and shared treatment selection.

Optimizing liquid effluent monitoring at a large nuclear complex.

Effluent monitoring typically requires a large number of analytes and samples during the initial or startup phase of a facility. Once a baseline is established, the analyte list and sampling frequency may be reduced. Although there is a large body of literature relevant to the initial design, few, if any, published papers exist on updating established effluent monitoring programs. This paper statistically evaluates four years of baseline data to optimize the liquid effluent monitoring efficiency of a centralized waste treatment and disposal facility at a large defense nuclear complex. Specific objectives were to: (1) assess temporal variability in analyte concentrations, (2) determine operational factors contributing to waste stream variability, (3) assess the probability of exceeding permit limits, and (4) streamline the sampling and analysis regime. Results indicated that the probability of exceeding permit limits was one in a million under normal facility operating conditions, sampling frequency could be reduced, and several analytes could be eliminated. Furthermore, indicators such as gross alpha and gross beta measurements could be used in lieu of more expensive specific isotopic analyses (radium, cesium-137, and strontium-90) for routine monitoring. Study results were used by the state regulatory agency to modify monitoring requirements for a new discharge permit, resulting in an annual cost savings of US dollars 223,000. This case study demonstrates that statistical evaluation of effluent contaminant variability coupled with process knowledge can help plant managers and regulators streamline analyte lists and sampling frequencies based on detection history and environmental risk.