Self-reported health in adolescent girls varies according to the season and its relation to medication and hormonal contraception--a descriptive study.

OBJECTIVES: To study seasonal variations in self-rated health and depressive symptoms in adolescent girls and possible differences in reported health with regard to use of medications. METHOD: The SF-36 questionnaire was completed by 1250 girls with a mean age of 17 years, who visited a health centre in the course of one year. From January to July inclusive, depressive symptoms in 453 of the participants were also assessed using MADRS-S. Age and regular medication data were recorded. RESULTS: Significantly better mental health and less depressive symptoms were reported during the summer, than in winter months. Seasonality was more related to the SF-36 mental, than physical health subscales. Respondents treated with hormonal contraceptives (HCs) only and those not taking any medication scored better on several SF-36 subscales, than girls on antidepressives and other medications. Respondents taking HCs tended to report better physical health and less depressive symptoms on MADRS-S than those taking no medication. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent girls showed seasonal variations in self-reported health and depressive symptoms, with more symptoms during winter months. HC users tended to report better physical health and less depressive symptoms than those on no medication. The high prevalence of suspected depression during the winter months deserves attention.

Could SF-36 be used as a screening instrument for depression in a Swedish youth population?

OBJECTIVE: Depression among youth is a condition associated with serious long-term morbidity and suicide. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a HRQoL instrument, the short form 36 version 1.0 (SF-36), could be used to screen for depression in a clinical Youth Centre (YC). A second purpose was to describe self-reported health and depression. SETTING: A clinical YC at a University hospital. DESIGN: A sample of 660 youths, 14-20 years old was assessed with SF-36 and Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, self-screening version (MADRS-S). Answers to all the questions in both instruments were given by 79% (519/660; 453 women and 66 men). Mean age in the sample was 17.5±1.6 years. RESULTS: Strong correlations were found between all the SF-36 subscales and the depression ratio scale MADRS-S. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed that the SF-36 subscales mental health (MH) and vitality (VT) could correctly predict depression on the individual level with Area Under the ROC Curve values 0.87 and 0.84 in ROC curves. Individuals scoring 48 or lower on MH and 40 or lower on VT should be followed up with a clinical interview concerning possible depressive disorder. Mild to moderate depression was common (35.5%), especially among women (37.5%). Men scored higher than women on all SF-36 subscales except for physical functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The SF-36 can be used to screen for suspect depression in a youth population followed by interview. This gives an opportunity to detect and treat emerging depressive symptoms early.