Gamma Knife thalamotomy for essential tremor.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results following Gamma Knife thalamotomy (GKT) for medically refractory essential tremor in a series of patients in whom open surgical techniques were not desirable. METHODS: Thirty-one patients underwent GKT for disabling essential tremor after medical therapy had failed. Their mean age was 77 years. Most patients were elderly or had concomitant medical illnesses. A single 4-mm isocenter was used to target a maximum dose of 130 or 140 Gy to the nucleus ventralis intermedius. Items from the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin clinical tremor rating scale were used to grade tremor and handwriting before and after radiosurgery. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 36 months. In the group of 26 evaluable patients, the mean tremor score (+/- standard deviation) was 3.7 +/- 0.1 preoperatively and 1.7 +/- 0.3 after radiosurgery (p < 0.000015). The mean handwriting score was 2.8 +/- 0.2 before GKT and 1.7 +/- 0.2 afterward (p < 0.0002). After radiosurgery, 18 patients (69%) showed improvement in both action tremor and writing scores, 6 (23%) only in action tremor scores, and 3 (12%) in neither tremor nor writing. Permanent mild right hemiparesis and speech impairment developed in 1 patient 6 months after radiosurgery. Another patient had transient mild right hemiparesis and dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Gamma Knife thalamotomy is a safe and effective therapy for medically refractory essential tremor. Its use is especially valuable for patients ineligible for radiofrequency thalamotomy or deep brain stimulation. Patients must be counseled on potential complications, including the low probability of a delayed neurological deficit.

In vivo evaluation of biomechanical anterior cervical plate failure.

Anterior cervical plate (ACP) failure is rarely addressed in the literature. In this retrospective, observational, longitudinal, cohort study, the objectives were to (1) identify incidences of in vivo biomechanical failure in commercially available, US Food and Drug Administration-approved ACP systems, (2) describe modes of failure, (3) suggest structural explanations for system failure, and (4) discuss complications and treatment of patients with failed ACP systems. Investigators retrospectively identified patients who underwent anterior cervical procedures followed by use of ACP as a fusion adjunct and showed evidence of ACP failure on plain radiographs. Components of the ACP system that led to failure were identified and examined. A total of 240 patients received ACP supplementation of anterior cervical fusion constructs during the 9.5-y study period. Evidence of ACP failure was noted in 7 patients (3.3%), and an eighth patient was referred for evaluation after ACP failure. Screw-plate interface failure occurred in all 8 cases. The biomechanical method by which the bone screw head was secured into the vertebral body, or against the ACP, the use of hybrid systems, the surgical technique selected, and host factors were used to determine the rate of failure. Concern for esophageal or other tissue injury often necessitated ACP removal. Screw-plate interface failure, which was found to be the most common mode of biomechanical ACP failure, may occur in hybrid constructs and in systems that do not create a rigid interface between the screw head and the ACP. Surgical technique and patient host factors may also influence the rate of biomechanical construct failure.

Prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis in craniotomy patients: a decision analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the most efficient perioperative prophylactic strategy for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in craniotomy patients by use of a decision analysis model. METHODS: We conducted a structured review of the relevant literature and compiled the reported incidences of DVT, pulmonary embolism, and postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in craniotomy patients. We also obtained from the literature estimates of the likelihood and the impact of various outcomes of these complications. Data from 810 craniotomies performed at our own institution were also examined. The decision analytic model was then used to compare the effectiveness of pneumatic compression boots with pneumatic compression boots combined with either unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin. The model dealt with variability by using both sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: As expected, the addition of heparin lowered the incidence of both DVT and pulmonary embolism, but at the cost of increasing ICH. Because the deleterious effects of ICH were so much greater than the benefits from heparinization, overall outcomes were best with mechanical prophylaxis alone. This was especially true for low-molecular-weight heparin, which is associated with a relatively high risk of ICH. Our own institutional data support the findings in the literature. Although the differences are modest, they reach statistical significance in the case of low-molecular-weight heparin. CONCLUSION: Using decision analytic modeling, we have shown that mechanical prophylaxis yields outcomes in craniotomy patients superior to those of either unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin.