Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To compare the amount of phacoemulsification ultrasound energy used between eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification. METHODS: One eye of consecutive patients undergoing routine non-complicated phacoemulsification from January 2014 to December of 2015 was included in the analysis. FLACS was performed using the Alcon LenSx. Linear regression was used for analysis with type of surgery (FLACS versus conventional phacoemulsification) as the exposure and cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) as the outcome variable. Age, surgeon, eye side, and eye sequence (first versus second eye) were covariates. RESULTS: A total of 1159 surgeries met inclusion criteria. The average age of the cohort was 70.6 (SD 8.6) years, 590 cases (51%) were performed by surgeon 1, and 582 cases (50%) were right eyes. Overall, FLACS resulted in significantly lower CDE as compared to conventional phacoemulsification (ß = 0.89, 95% CI 0.83, 0.95). When stratified by eye side and surgeon, FLACS performed on left eyes operated on by surgeon 1 resulted in lower CDE as compared to conventional phacoemulsification (ß = 0.76, 95% CI 0.66, 0.87), but not for right eyes operated on by surgeon 1 (ß = 0.92, 95% CI 0.79, 1.07) or for eyes operated on by surgeons 2 or 3. CONCLUSIONS: The use of FLACS on the Alcon LenSx platform results in a small decrease in phacoemulsification energy as compared to conventional phacoemulsification in certain cases. Further study assessing optimal laser settings and surgical technique is necessary.

Physical activity, visual impairment, and eye disease.

Numerous studies have demonstrated physical activity is a strong factor in overall health and well-being, and a growing body of literature, reviewed herein, suggests that several eye conditions, including glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, and diabetic retinopathy, are associated with lower activity levels. Likewise, physical activity levels are lower in persons with worse vision. Research in this area has utilized both self-reported physical activity measures as well as objective measures of activity (i.e., accelerometers), each of which have their own strengths and limitations. Putative mechanisms explaining the association of various eye conditions with physical activity are discussed. It is possible that activity restriction occurs as a downstream consequence of eye disease/visual impairment, that activity restriction causes eye disease/visual impairment, or that causality is bidirectional; evidence supporting each of these theories is put forth. An improved understanding of the relationship between physical activity and eye disease will highlight potential secondary health risks resulting from eye disease, and can help determine whether activity might serve as a readily available preventative measure to prevent specific eye conditions.