Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: comparative analysis of early and delayed reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Early reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer with definitive implants has been widely used, especially with the evolution of conservative surgical breast cancer treatments. We aimed to identify different characteristics associated with plastic surgery, based on immediate or delayed reconstruction time and evaluate quality of life in patients undergoing mastectomy for cancer. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analytical study that evaluated adult patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer and breast reconstruction in Plastic Surgery Service at a tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Between March 2011 and November 2015, 58 patients who underwent mastectomy were included, with a mean age of 51.6±10.6 years and 98.3% of them being women. Eighty percent of the patients underwent a radical mastectomy and 20% underwent segmentectomies. Immediate and delayed surgical reconstructions occurred in 22.4% and 77.6% of the cases, respectively, including immediate reconstruction with the local flap trade (15.5%), immediate reconstruction with prosthesis (6.9%), transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap (6.9%), delayed reconstruction with local flap (8.6%), expander and prosthesis (35.7%), and reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and prosthesis (22.4%). When comparing subjects undergoing reconstructive surgery based on timing of reconstruction, it was observed that patients undergoing delayed breast reconstruction surgery presented a higher proportion of radical mastectomy (90.7% vs. 41.7%; P=0.001) and the need for two or more surgical interventions (64.1% vs. 20.0%; P=0.029). There was no difference in the quality of life according to reconstruction time. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics associated with postmastectomy reconstruction timing are related to preoperative factors such as the procedure employed and the number of interventions performed and have no influence on complications or the quality of life.

Factores de riesgo asociados a traumatismo al nacimiento / Risk factors associated with birth trauma

ANTECEDENTES: Se define trauma al nacimiento las lesiones sufridas por el feto durante el trabajo de parto o expulsión. OBJETIVO: Identificar los factores de riesgo asociados a lesiones originadas durante el nacimiento en recién nacidos. MÉTODO: Estudio casos y controles, realizado en el período de julio/2004 a diciembre/2005, en la División de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital General de Caxias do Sul/ Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil. Fueron analizadas variables maternas, del parto y fetales, utilizando el programa estadístico SPSS versión 19.0. Los factores que obtuvieron nivel significativo <0,10 en los análisis bivariado fueron insertas en la regresión logística. Se utilizó el modelo de entrada por bloques (block entry) para selección del modelo final de la regresión. RESULTADOS: En el período citado nacieron 2.137 infantes, 26 de ellos (1,2%) sufrieron trauma al nacimiento. La fractura de clavícula fue la lesión más frecuente (n=14; 53,8%), seguida del cefalohematoma (n=5; 19,2%). Las variables gasométricas no presentaron diferencia estadística. En la regresión logística, las únicas variables independientes asociadas a traumatismo al nacimiento fueron parto vaginal (OR-A: 11,08; IC95%: 2,45-49,98; p=0,002) y perímetro torácico >33 cm (OR-A: 3,36; IC95%: 1,35-9,73; p=0,010). CONCLUSIÓN: Los factores de riesgo asociados a lesiones durante el nacimiento involucran el parto vaginal y el perímetro torácico igual o superior a 33cm.

BACKGROUND: Obstetrics injuries can be defined as fetal lesions suffered by the fetus during labor or expulsion. OBJECTIVE: Identify risk factors for fetal birth trauma. METHOD: Case-control study conducted from July 2004 to December 2005. We analyzed maternal and fetal variables using software SPSS 19.0. The variables showing a significance level <0.10 in the bivariate analysis were included in the logistic regression analysis. We used the block entry model for selection of the final regression model. RESULTS: During these period, we identified 2137 births and 26 (1.2%) were related to fetal birth injury. Clavicle fracture was the most frequent injury (n = 14; 53.8%), followed by cephalohematoma (n = 5; 19.2%). Umbilical cord blood gas analysis did not show statistical significance. In the regression analysis of the variables that had significance level <0.10, the only independent variables associated with fetal birth injury were vaginal delivery (OR-A: 11.08; 95%CI: 2.45-49.98; p=0.002) and thorax circumference > 33 cm (OR-A: 3.36; 95%CI: 1.35-9.73; p=0.010). CONCLUSION: The risk factors for fetal birth injury were vaginal delivery and chest circumference equal to or larger than 33 cm. Other variables were not associated with the outcome in discussion.