RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of reinnervation techniques for the treatment of adult unilateral vocal fold paralysis and bilateral vocal fold paralysis. METHODS: A literature review was conducted in the Embase and Medline databases in English, with no limitations on the publication date. The outcome parameters of interest included visual, subjective perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic analysis and electromyography. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model and inverse variance was calculated. RESULTS: The systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach resulted in 27 studies, totalling 803 patients (747 unilateral cases and 56 bilateral cases). Thyroid cancer and/or surgery had caused unilateral vocal fold paralysis in 74.8 per cent of cases and bilateral vocal fold paralysis in 69.6 per cent of cases. Statistically significant improvements in patients were observed for voice, deglutition and decannulation (bilateral vocal fold paralysis). Meta-analysis of 10 reinnervation techniques was calculated for the maximum phonation time of 184 patients. CONCLUSION: Reinnervation was shown to improve voice, swallowing and decannulation, but studies lacked control groups, limiting generalisability. Larger studies with controls are needed.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In the UK, the National Cancer Plan (2000) requires every cancer patient's care to be reviewed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Since the introduction of these guidelines, MDTs have faced escalating demands with increasing numbers and complexity of cases. The COVID-19 pandemic has presented MDTs with the challenge of running MDT meetings virtually rather than face-to-face.This study aims to explore how the change from face-to-face to virtual MDT meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted the effectiveness of decision-making in cancer MDT meetings and to make recommendations to improve future cancer MDT working based on the findings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods study with three parallel phases:Semistructured remote qualitative interviews with ≤40 cancer MDT members.A national cross-sectional online survey of cancer MDT members in England, using a validated questionnaire with both multiple-choice and free-text questions.Live observations of ≥6 virtual/hybrid cancer MDT meetings at four NHS Trusts.Participants will be recruited from Cancer Alliances in England. Data collection tools have been developed in consultation with stakeholders, based on a conceptual framework devised from decision-making models and MDT guidelines. Quantitative data will be summarised descriptively, and χ2 tests run to explore associations. Qualitative data will be analysed using applied thematic analysis. Using a convergent design, mixed-methods data will be triangulated guided by the conceptual framework.The study has been approved by NHS Research Ethics Committee (London-Hampstead) (22/HRA/0177). The results will be shared through peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences. A report summarising key findings will be used to develop a resource pack for MDTs to translate learnings from this study into improved effectiveness of virtual MDT meetings.The study has been registered on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/D2NHW).
