High platelet reactivity is a predictor of left ventricular remodelling in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with left ventricular remodelling (LVR), which leads to progressive heart failure. Platelets play a pivotal role in promoting systemic and cardiac inflammatory responses during the complex process of myocardial wound healing or repair following AMI. This study aimed to investigate the impact of platelet reactivity immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on LVR in AMI patients with ST-segment (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective, single-centre, observational study included 182 patients with AMI who underwent primary PCI (107 patient with STEMI and 75 patients with NSTEMI). Patients were administered a loading dose of aspirin plus prasugrel before the procedure, and platelet reactivity was assessed using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay immediately after PCI. Echocardiography was performed before discharge and during the chronic phase (8 ± 3 months after discharge). LVR was defined as a relative ≥20% increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI). LVR in chronic phase was found in 34 patients (18.7%) whose platelet reactivity was significantly higher than those without LVR (259.6 ± 61.5 and 213.1 ± 74.8 P2Y12 reaction units [PRU]; P = 0.001). The occurrence of LVR did not differ between patients with STEMI and patients with NSTEMI (21.5% and 14.7%; P = 0.33). The optimal cut-off value of platelet reactivity for discriminating LVR was ≥245 PRU. LVEDVI significantly decreased at chronic phase in patients without high platelet reactivity (<245 PRU) (from 49.2 ± 13.5 to 45.4 ± 15.8 mL/m2 ; P = 0.02), but not in patients with high platelet reactivity (≥d245 PRU) (P = 0.06). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that high platelet reactivity was an independent predictor of LVR after adjusting for LVEDVI before discharge (odds ratio, 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-9.79). CONCLUSIONS: High platelet reactivity measured immediately after PCI was a predictor of LVR in patients with AMI during the chronic phase. The role of antiplatelet therapy on inflammation in the myocardium is a promising area for further research.

Successful Nonsurgical Treatment of Acute Peritonitis Caused by a Large Thrombosis of the Superior Mesenteric Vein in a 25-year-old Woman.

Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis (SMVT), which results from various etiologies, including coagulation disorders, can be diagnosed early using advanced imaging technology. However, few reports have described the nonsurgical treatment of acute peritonitis caused by SMVT. We encountered a young woman whose history included abdominal pain and daily oral contraceptives and who presented with acute peritonitis caused by SMVT. We administered nonsurgical treatment that included thrombolysis and anticoagulation for the peritonitis (without mesenteric ischemia as confirmed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography). In addition, we showed the importance of investigating persistent risk factors for thromboembolism in young patients to determine the duration of anticoagulation.

Brachial intima-media thickness is associated with coronary artery atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) as measured by computed tomography is a strong predictor of coronary artery disease. The brachial intima-media thickness (IMT) was recently reported to be associated with cardiovascular risk factors. This study investigated the association of brachial IMT with CAC, which is a marker of coronary artery atherosclerosis, in patients with diabetes. We enrolled 292 patients with diabetes (mean age, 65 ± 12 years; 59% men) who underwent both endothelial function testing and computed tomography for risk assessment of coronary artery disease. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and IMT in the brachial artery were measured with a specialized machine. FMD was lower and brachial IMT was thicker in patients with than without CAC. The CAC score was significantly correlated with both brachial IMT and FMD, while the multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that brachial IMT (> 0.32 mm) but not FMD (< 5.1%) was significantly associated with the presence of CAC (odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.77; p = 0.02). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for discriminating patients with CAC was 0.67 for IMT (p < 0.001) and 0.62 for FMD (p < 0.001). When patients were classified into four groups based on brachial IMT and FMD, the CAC score was higher in patients with thicker brachial IMT and lower FMD than in patients of the other groups (p < 0.001). Measurement of brachial IMT could be useful for the risk assessment of patients with diabetes.

Association between changes in platelet reactivity during elective percutaneous coronary intervention and periprocedural myocardial infarction: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: High platelet reactivity before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reportedly increases the risk of PCI-related myocardial infarction (PMI) following elective PCI. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate changes in platelet reactivity during PCI and their association with the incidence of PMI. METHODS: In total, 133 consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI after pretreatment with dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 7 days were prospectively enrolled. Platelet reactivity was measured by the VerifyNow® assay (International Technidyne Corporation, Edison, NJ, USA) immediately before and after PCI. RESULTS: Platelet reactivity significantly increased from 177.3 ± 53.4 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) before PCI to 203.4 ± 52.8 PRU immediately after PCI (p < 0.001). Absolute changes in platelet reactivity were significantly greater in patients with than without PMI (32.4 ± 29.0 vs. 21.2 ± 24.8 PRU, respectively; p = 0.021). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the absolute change in PRU was an independent predictor of the incidence of PMI. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the change in PRU during PCI for discriminating PMI showed a sensitivity, specificity, and the cut-off value of 46%, 76%, and 37 PRU, respectively (area under the curve = 0.607, p = 0.0235). When the patients were divided into two groups, namely a greater (change in PRU ≥ 37) and smaller (change in PRU < 37) increase group, the incidence rate of PMI was significantly higher in the greater than smaller increase group (59.1% vs. 34.8%, respectively; p = 0.008). Additional exploratory analyses by intracoronary imaging demonstrated that the proximal reference lumen area in the greater increase group was significantly smaller than that in the smaller increase group (6.5 ± 2.4 vs. 7.7 ± 3.1 mm2, respectively; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: An increase in platelet reactivity after elective PCI is possibly associated with PMI. This finding should be validated by a larger-scale study.

Differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes with different drug-eluting stents in Japanese patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse clinical outcomes, the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in Japanese patients and differences in effectiveness between different DES types remain unknown. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: Five-hundred and sixty-two consecutive patients (183 with DM, 379 without DM) with 676 lesions were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES, n=531; 160 DM group, 371 non-DM group) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES, n=145; 64 and 81, respectively). We assessed the initial and 8-month follow-up clinical and angiographic outcomes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical and lesion characteristics, although the pre-minimum luminal diameter was smaller in the DM group (p=0.016). The risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or recurrent angina pectoris, was higher in the DM group compared with the non-DM group (17.4% vs 9.5%, p=0.007). Among diabetic patients, although SES reduced late loss by 0.45 mm (p<0.001) and the binary restenosis rate by 66.4% (7.4% vs 22.0%, p<0.001) compared with PES at 8 months, it did not reduce target lesion revascularization or MACE, as in the non-DM group. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients have worse mid-term prognosis than non-diabetic patients undergoing PCI with DES. Although the superiority of SES in terms of late loss or restenosis may not play a clinically meaningful role in the treatment of diabetic patients, this phenomenon was independent of the presence of diabetes.

Five-year clinical outcomes after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse clinical outcomes; however, the long-term efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in diabetic patients remains uncertain. We evaluated 5-year clinical outcomes after SES implantation in 197 consecutive patients (85 in the DM group and 112 in the non-DM group), and 246 lesions (106 and 140, respectively). The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis or admission for congestive heart failure. Diabetic patient characteristics included 32 % who used insulin. The risk of congestive heart failure was significantly higher [20.0 vs. 5.4 %, odds ratio (OR) 4.417, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.659 to 11.759, p = 0.003] in the DM group compared with the non-DM group; however, MACE did not occur significantly more often (27.1 vs. 16.1 %, p = 0.060). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes was associated with congestive heart failure (OR 4.715, 95 % CI 1.743 to 12.759, p = 0.002) and multivessel disease was associated with major adverse cardiac events (OR 2.709, 95 % CI 1.053 to 6.965, p = 0.039). The cumulative rates (%) of TLR were as follows: after 1 year; 5.9 versus 5.4, 2 years; 7.1 versus 5.4, 3 years; 9.4 versus 7.1, 4 years; 9.4 versus 8.9, 5 years; 9.4 versus 8.9 (p = 0.652) in the DM group and the non-DM group, respectively. Diabetic patients had worse long-term prognosis in terms of congestive heart failure than non-diabetic patients undergoing PCI, even with SES. TLR was performed steadily for up to 5 years of follow-up following the late catch-up phenomenon both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.