Effects of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Japan is one of the world's most aging societies and the number of elderly patients taking antithrombotic drugs is increasing. In recent years, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), in which two antiplatelet drugs are administered, has become common in anticipation of its high therapeutic efficacy. However, there are concerns about increased bleeding complications in use of DAPT. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the effects of DAPT in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted from December 2019 to May 2021 to examine the effects of antithrombotic drugs and reversal drugs in 721 elderly patients with TBI. In the current study, the effect of DAPT on TBI was examined in a secondary analysis. Among the registered patients, 132 patients taking antiplatelet drugs only were divided into those treated with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (n=106) and those treated with DAPT (n=26) prior to TBI. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on admission, pupillary findings, course during hospitalization, and outcome were compared in the two groups. A similar analysis was performed in patients with a mild GCS of 13-15 (n=95) and a moderate to severe GCS of 3-12 (n=37) on admission. The DAPT group had significantly more males (67.0 % vs. 96.2 %), a higher severity of illness on admission, and a higher frequency of brain herniation findings on head CT (21.7 % vs. 46.2 %), resulting in significantly higher mortality (12.3 % vs. 30.8 %). The only significant factor for mortality was severity on admission. The rate of DAPT was significantly higher in patients with a moderate to severe GCS on admission, and DAPT was the only significant factor related to severity on admission. These findings suggest that the severity of injury on admission influences the outcome six months after injury, and that patients with more severe TBI on admission are more likely to have been treated with DAPT compared to SAPT.

The current status of reversal therapy in Japan for elderly patients with head injury treated with antithrombotic agents: A prospective multicenter observational study.

Background: Acute exacerbation of head injury in elderly patients due to use of antithrombotic agents has become a concern in countries with aging populations. Reversal agents are recommended for treatment, but its usage is unclear. Therefore, we conducted a prospective observational study in this patient population to monitor usage of reversal therapy. Methods: The subjects were 721 elderly patients aged ≥65 years old who were hospitalized in 15 centers from December 2019 to May 2021. Patients were divided into groups who did not receive antithrombotic agents (Group A), who received antithrombotic agents, but did not receive reversal therapy (Group B), and were treated with antithrombotic agents and reversal therapy (Group C). Age, gender, mechanism of injury, neurologic and imaging findings on admission, clinical course after admission and surgery, outcomes and complications were compared among these groups. Time from injury to reversal therapy was examined based on outcomes to investigate trends in the timing of administration of the reversal agent. Results: Acute exacerbation during the clinical course occurred in 9.8 %, 15.8 % and 31.0 % of cases in Groups A, B and C, respectively, and differed significantly among the groups. On head CT, the incidences of hematoma were 35.7 %, 36.5 % and 60.4 %, respectively, with this incidence being significantly higher in Group C; and the respective rates of craniotomy were 18.8 %, 14.0 % and 50.9 %, again with this rate being significantly higher in Group C. The good outcome and mortality rates were 57.1 %, 52.5 % and 35.8 %, and 14.5 %, 18.0 % and 24.5 %, respectively, and both were poorest in Group C. Times from injury to treatment with a reversal agent were significantly shorter in patients without compared to those with acute exacerbation (405.9 vs. 880.8 min) and in patients with favorable outcomes compared to those with unfavorable outcomes (261.9 vs. 543.4 min). Conclusion: Similarly to previous studies, the incidence of acute exacerbation was increased by use of antithrombotic agents. These results suggest that patients in Japan who require hematoma evacuation due to symptom exacerbation tend to be treated with reversal agents. Although it is difficult to assess the efficacy of reversal therapy from this study, earlier treatment with reversal agents before the occurrence of acute exacerbation may be useful to improve outcomes.

[Emergency Resuscitation Techniques:Airway, Breathing, and Circulation].

Cardiac arrest causes cerebral anoxia, resulting in loss of consciousness within seconds and irreversible brain damage within 3-5 min. Emergency resuscitation is generally performed on patients in cardiopulmonary or near-cardiopulmonary arrest, i.e., life-threatening conditions, and requires rapid stabilization of the airway, breathing, and circulation(or "ABC")to maintain cerebral perfusion. Generally, the ABC approach represents the order of medical treatment for critically ill patients. It provides supportive care(resuscitation)after ensuring the flow of oxygen supply necessary to sustain life. The most important goal in emergency resuscitation is to ensure a secure airway, without which, resuscitation is hopeless. Clinicians should be prepared daily to avoid missing any opportunity to ensure a secure airway. Even in cardiac arrest, high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is necessary to reduce the duration of cerebral anoxia. An algorithm for this high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is described in this article.

Serum D-dimer level as a predictor of neurological functional prognosis in cases of head injuries caused by road traffic accidents.

BACKGROUND: The number of traffic fatalities is declining in Japan; however, a large proportion of head injuries are still attributable to traffic accidents. Severe head trauma may cause progressive and devastating coagulopathy owing to exacerbated coagulation and fibrinolysis, which results in massive bleeding and poor patient outcomes. D-dimer is a fibrinolytic marker, which remarkably increases in severe coagulopathy due to the exacerbated fibrinolytic system. Because the degree of coagulopathy is associated with patient outcomes, the D-dimer level is a useful prognostic predictor in patients with head trauma. However, the usefulness of D-dimer in cases of head trauma caused by road traffic accidents remains inadequately explored. In this study, we investigated the relationship between D-dimer levels and outcomes in head injuries caused by traffic accidents. METHODS: We extracted data on traffic injuries from Japan Neuro-Trauma Data Bank Project 2015, which is a prospective multicenter registry of head injuries. The analysis included 335 individuals with no missing data. The outcome variable was the score of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), a neurological outcome index. The participants were categorized into the favorable outcome (GOS score ≥ 4) and poor outcome (GOS score ≤ 3) groups. The serum D-dimer levels at the time of admission were divided into four categories at the quartiles, and the reference category was less than the first quartile (< 17.4 µg/mL). We performed a logistic regression analysis with GOS as the dependent variable and D-dimer as a predictor and performed a multivariate analysis that was adjusted for 10 physiological parameters. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, all groups with serum D-dimer values ≥ 17.4 µg/dL showed significantly poorer outcomes than those of the reference group. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for other factors, D-dimer levels ≥ 89.3 µg/dL were an independent predictor of poor outcome. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for physiological parameters, high serum D-dimer levels can be an independent factor for predicting neurological prognosis in head trauma caused by road traffic accidents.

A Case of Intravascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis That Developed While Driving.

Objective: We report a case of acute cerebral infarction that may have been associated with high-energy trauma due to onset while driving. Case Presentation: A 67-year-old man had a traffic accident. His neurological symptoms were left hemiplegia and contrast CT revealed right middle cerebral artery occlusion. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and intravascular treatment were performed. Right carotid artery angiography demonstrated internal carotid artery stenosis. Middle cerebral artery (MCA) revascularization was performed only by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the internal carotid artery. Thoracic hemorrhage was observed a few hours after surgery, and hemostasis was performed by thoracotomy. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) was performed 8 days after onset. The patient was transferred to a convalescent rehabilitation hospital. Conclusion: Rt-PA and acute CAS were not recommended for cerebral infarction due to traffic accident.

Comparison of the Airway Scope and Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line cervical stabilization by the semisolid neck collar: manikin study.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of Airway Scope (AWS) and Macintosh direct laryngoscope (ML) for patients with trauma requiring intubation with in-line cervical stabilization for protection of the cervical spine was compared. METHODS: Thirty-three residents performed orotracheal intubation using ML and AWS in an intubation model with in-line cervical stabilization. The tracheal intubation success rate, time required for tracheal intubation, and number of trials of inserting the tracheal tube into the trachea were measured in individual residents. RESULTS: Two residents inserted the tube into the esophagus using ML (success rate: 93.9%), but all residents succeeded in tracheal intubation using AWS (success rate: 100%) (p = 0.492). The time required for intubation was similar using AWS and ML (15 seconds vs. 20 seconds, p = 0.261). The number of trials using AWS was significantly lower (2.0 times vs. 1.0 times, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The usefulness of AWS may be comparable with or greater than that of ML for oral intubation in trauma patients with in-line cervical stabilization.