RESUMO
Background: The utility of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularisation in the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains unclear. Objective: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of patients following FFR-guided revascularisation for either ACS or stable angina (SA) and in particular focuses on the outcome of those with deferred revascularisation after FFR. Methods: A meta-analysis of existing literature was performed. Outcomes including the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), mortality and unplanned revascularisation were analysed. Results: A review of 937 records yielded 9 studies comparing 5457 patients, which were included in the analyses. Patients with ACS had a higher rate of recurrent MI (OR 1.81, p=0.02) and a strong trend towards more MACE and all-cause mortality compared with patients with SA when treated by an FFR-guided revascularisation strategy. Deferral of invasive therapy on the basis of FFR led to a higher rate of MACE (17.6% vs 7.3 %; p=0.004), recurrent MI (5.3% vs 1.5%, p=0.001) and target vessel revascularisation (16.4% vs 5.6 %; p=0.02) in patients with ACS, and a strong trend towards a higher cardiovascular mortality at follow-up when compared with patients with SA. Conclusion: The event rate in patients with ACS is much higher than SA despite following an FFR-guided revascularisation strategy. Deferring revascularisation does not appear to be as safe for ACS as it is for SA using contemporary FFR cut-offs validated in SA. Refinement of the therapeutic strategy for patients with ACS with multivessel disease is needed to redress the balance.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Absorb BVS is a new generation of coronary stent designed to provide coronary arteries with mechanical support of a temporary nature, following balloon angioplasty. Clinical trials of the device have shown promising results thus far, however concern surrounds the deliverability of the device in real-world and complex coronary disease, and the possible higher incidence of early scaffold thrombosis when compared to conventional metallic drug-eluting stents. METHODS: Implantation of the Absorb BVS was attempted in 152 lesions in 100 patients at two Sydney teaching hospitals, as part of a prospective registry. Lesions treated reflected a wide spectrum of real-world disease. Young patient age, long lesion length and involvement of the mid-portion of the left anterior descending artery were the strongest factors likely to influence the decision to use the Absorb BVS over conventional metallic stents. There were no restrictions on the lesion length, or on the number of lesions or vessels treated. Type C lesions made up 37% of all lesions treated with 64% of these being long lesions (>20mm). The Absorb BVS was successfully implanted in 98.8% of cases. Post-dilatation was performed in 95% of scaffolds. Peri-procedural non-ST elevation myocardial infarction occurred in four cases. Scaffold thrombosis did not occur in any patient at 30 days follow-up. There was no death, or need for target lesion revascularisation in-hospital or at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of procedural success were achieved with minimal complications with use of the Absorb BVS in real-world coronary disease, including complex disease. These results suggest that the reduced deliverability of the device can be largely overcome by meticulous lesion preparation, and that early scaffold thrombosis may be minimised through scaffold post-dilatation.
