Phase separation of ternary self-assembled monolayers into hydrophobic 1-dodecanethiol domains and electrostatically stabilized hydrophilic domains composed of 2-aminoethanethiol and 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid on Au(111).

Ternary self-assembled monolayers (SAM) composed of 2-aminoethanethiol (AET), 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid (MES), and 1-dodecanethiol (DDeT) form two types of domains as if it were a two-component SAM: DDeT-rich hydrophobic domains and electrostatically stabilized hydrophilic domains composed of MES and AET on Au(111). MES and AET behave virtually as a single surface-active species. Two distinct reductive desorption peaks in cyclic voltammograms (CV) and binarized images of scanning tunneling microscopy clearly show nanometer scale, yet macroscopically distinguishable, phase separation over a wide range of the mixing ratio of DDeT and MES-AET in the bathing solution. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements indicate that the ratio of MES to AET in the hydrophilic domains is unity and that both terminal groups are in the charged states, that is, the sulfonate group and the ammonium group. With decreasing the total concentration of the thiols, the mole fraction of DDeT in the bathing solution at which the surface coverage of MES-AET domains is equal to that of DDeT domains dramatically decreases. This suggests that the adsorption kinetics plays a crucial role in the formation of the domains structure.

Ideal nonideality in adsorption of 2-aminoethanethiol and 2-mercaptoethane sulfonic acid to form electrostatically stabilized binary self-assembled monolayers on Au(111).

In formation of binary self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) composed of 2-aminoethanethiol (AET) and 2-mercaptoethane sulfonic acid (MES) by adsorption from an ethanol solution on Au(111), the adsorption shows nearly ideal nonideality in that the surface ratio of MES to AET in the SAM is unity and does not depend on the mixing ratio of MES to AET in the bathing ethanol solution used for preparing SAMs, chi(soln)MES, over the wide range of chi(soln)MES between 0.01 and 0.95. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirms that at least 80% of AET molecules adsorbed are protonated in this range of chi(soln)MES, indicating that the electrostatic interaction between positively charged AET and negatively charged MES is responsible to the observed nonideality. Correspondingly, there appears only one cathodic peak in a linear-sweep voltammogram of the reductive desorption of the SAM, having a narrow full width at half-maximum of about 20 mV. This suggests the presence of strong lateral attractive interaction between the adsorbed thiolates.