Cardiac sodium channel inhibition by lamotrigine: In vitro characterization and clinical implications.

Lamotrigine, approved for use as an antiseizure medication as well as the treatment of bipolar disorder, inhibits sodium channels in the brain to reduce repetitive neuronal firing and pathological release of glutamate. The shared homology of sodium channels and lack of selectivity associated with channel blocking agents can cause slowing of cardiac conduction and increased proarrhythmic potential. The Vaughan-Williams classification system differentiates sodium channel blockers using biophysical properties of binding. As such, Class Ib inhibitors, including mexiletine, do not slow cardiac conduction as measured by the electrocardiogram, at therapeutically relevant exposure. Our goal was to characterize the biophysical properties of NaV 1.5 block and to support the observed clinical safety of lamotrigine. We used HEK-293 cells stably expressing the hNaV 1.5 channel and voltage clamp electrophysiology to quantify the potency (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) against peak and late channel current, on-/off-rate binding kinetics, voltage-dependence, and tonic block of the cardiac sodium channel by lamotrigine; and compared to clinically relevant Class Ia (quinidine), Ib (mexiletine), and Ic (flecainide) inhibitors. Lamotrigine blocked peak and late NaV 1.5 current at therapeutically relevant exposure, with rapid kinetics and biophysical properties similar to the class Ib inhibitor mexiletine. However, no clinically meaningful prolongation in QRS or PR interval was observed in healthy subjects in a new analysis of a previously reported thorough QT clinical trial (SCA104648). In conclusion, the weak NaV 1.5 block and rapid kinetics do not translate into clinically relevant conduction slowing at therapeutic exposure and support the clinical safety of lamotrigine in patients suffering from epilepsy and bipolar disorder.

Extrapolation and dosing recommendations for raxibacumab in children from birth to age <18 years.

AIMS: The US Food and Drug Administration's Animal Rule allows for the approval of drugs when human efficacy studies are not ethical. While the therapeutic doses of raxibacumab, a monoclonal antibody for the prophylaxis and treatment of inhalational anthrax, have been based on pharmacokinetic data from adult subjects, its disposition in children has not been investigated in clinical trials. Here we evaluate the effect of demographic covariates and maturation processes on the pharmacokinetics of raxibacumab and explore opportunities for the optimisation of paediatric doses. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetic model was used as basis for the extrapolation of raxibacumab disposition from adults to children. Different extrapolation scenarios, including weight-banded dosing regimens, were considered to assess the effect of growth and maturation on the pharmacokinetic parameters of interest. Area under the concentration-time curve, maximum plasma concentration and the time of serum raxibacumab concentrations greater than or equimolar to the highest serum protective antigen concentrations observed for at least 28 days in any monkey challenged with Bacillus anthracis that died were derived and compared with the currently approved US doses. RESULTS: Based on practical considerations, a weight-banded dosing regimen consisting of 4 dose levels (75 mg/kg for individuals ≤1.5 kg, 55 mg/kg for individuals <10 kg, 45 mg/kg for individuals <50 kg, 40 mg/kg for all individuals >50 kg) was required to optimise target exposure across the paediatric population. CONCLUSIONS: Age-related maturation processes may affect raxibacumab clearance in very young patients. The proposed dosing regimens take into account effects of body weight and maturation processes on the elimination of raxibacumab.

Population pharmacokinetics of raxibacumab in healthy adult subjects.

AIMS: Raxibacumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of Bacillus anthracis toxins, thereby protecting target cells from its effects. Raxibacumab is approved in the USA for the treatment of adults and children with inhalational anthrax in combination with antibiotics, and for prophylaxis of inhalational anthrax. The aim of this investigation was to characterise the population pharmacokinetics and assess the effect of baseline demographic covariates on the disposition of raxibacumab. METHODS: The data used for this analysis were obtained from 3 clinical trials and include 2229 blood samples from 322 healthy subjects who were randomised to receive a 40 mg/kg intravenous dose of raxibacumab over a period of 2.25 hours. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using a nonlinear mixed effects approach. Secondary parameters of interest were the area under the curve, maximum concentration and the time of serum raxibacumab concentrations greater than or equimolar to the highest serum protective antigen concentrations observed for at least 28 days in any monkey challenged with B. anthracis that died. RESULTS: Raxibacumab exposure in healthy subjects was described by a 2-compartment model. Interindividual variability was estimated for all model parameters, whilst residual variability was described by a proportional and additive error model. Weight was the only influential covariate with significant effect on disposition parameters. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of 40 mg/kg provided comparable exposure across the overall healthy subject population. Interindividual variability in raxibacumab vs. time profiles could partially be accounted for by differences in body weight.

Population pharmacokinetics of NNZ-2566 in healthy subjects.

NNZ-2566 is a novel, small molecule being developed as a treatment for cognitive impairment in different CNS conditions, including Rett and Fragile-X syndrome, both of which are associated with moderate to severe neurodevelopmental disorder. In the current study we characterise the population pharmacokinetics of NNZ-2566 after administration of single and repeated ascending doses to healthy subjects. A meta-analytical approach was used to analyse pharmacokinetic data from 3 different studies, in which a total of 61 healthy subjects (median age: 23years, range: 19 to 38) were treated with NNZ-2566. Doses of NNZ-2566 ranged from 6.0 to 100mg/kg after oral administration and from 0.1 to 30mg/kg after intravenous administration. A two-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination was found to best describe the pharmacokinetics of NNZ-2566. Inter-individual variability was identified in clearance, absorption rate, central volume of distribution, peripheral volume of distribution and inter-compartmental clearance. Population predicted clearance and central volume of distribution were 10.35L/h and 20.23L, respectively. Dose proportionality was observed across the dose range evaluated in healthy subjects. No accumulation, metabolic inhibition or induction was observed during the course of treatment. In addition, oral bioavailability appeared to vary with food intake. The relatively short half-life of 1.4h suggests the need for a twice or three times daily regimen to maintain relevant blood levels of NNZ-2566.

Biomarker exposure-response relationships as the basis for rational dose selection: Lessons from a simulation exercise using a selective COX-2 inhibitor.

An exposure-response model was used to characterize the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of GW406381, a COX-2 inhibitor, based on data from ex vivo prostaglandin E2 inhibition collected in a phase 1 study in healthy subjects. The final model was then used to simulate a proof-of-concept study and to explore suitable dosing ranges in case of hepatic dysfunction or metabolic induction. Trough concentrations in the range of IC80 to IC95 were used as target therapeutic concentrations. Symptom relief in a subsequent phase 2b study in 400 patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving GW406381 was then analysed to support the design of a phase 3 study in which doses in the range between 10 to 400 mg were explored. The exercise also allowed the evaluation of correlations between the biomarker and clinical end point. A 2-compartment model described the pharmacokinetics of GW406381, whereas the pharmacodynamics was described by an Imax model. In patients with normal organ function, the predicted median therapeutic dose was between 100 and 150 mg. The time course of symptom relief was fitted by a Weibull model, with an Imax model describing the drug effect. Simulations showed that dose-response discrimination occurred at doses higher than 150 mg, with predicted 60%-80% target engagement in the dose range of 150-400 mg.