Relationship between demoralization and quality of life in end-of-life cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between demoralization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a sample of end-of-life cancer patients with a life expectancy of 4 months or less undergoing palliative care, controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables. METHODS: Sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological data from 170 end-of-life cancer patients were collected using the following scales: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System for palliative care patients' symptoms; Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depressive symptoms; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale - General Measure (FACT-G) for HRQoL; Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being for spirituality (FACIT-Sp); Demoralization Scale - Italian Version (DS-IT) for demoralization. RESULTS: The DS-IT showed that 51.8% of cancer patients were severely demoralized. In addition, 36.5% of the sample had clinically significant depressive symptoms and QoL was severely impaired (FACT-G). The result of regression analysis showed that demoralization (especially "Disheartenment" and "Sense of failure") was the strongest contributor for HRQoL, followed by ESAS_Lack of Well-Being and depression (PHQ-9), with the final model explaining 66% of the variance of the FACT-G. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight a very high prevalence of severe demoralization in end-of life cancer patients. Moreover, demoralization was not only associated with patients' HRQoL, but it was also the most important contributing factor. This finding underscores the need to identify preventive or therapeutic psychological interventions that focus on preventing existential distress, and thus improve the QoL of dying patients in their last days of life.

Hope in end-of-life cancer patients: A cross-sectional analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Hope promotes oncology patients' adaptability to their illness, regardless of the stage of cancer. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of hope in a sample of end-of-life patients and to investigate the possible relationships between hope and a set of clinical and psychosocial measures. METHOD: Three hundred and fifty end-of-life oncology patients, with a presumed life expectancy of 4 months or less and a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 50 or lower, were administered the Italian validated versions of a set of rating scales during their first consultation with a psychologist. This included the Herth Hope Index (HHI), Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI), Demoralization Scale (DS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-Sp), and the Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS). RESULTS: On average, the sample scored between moderate and high on the HHI and the average level of spirituality was high. However, most patients had clinically relevant anxious and depressive symptomatology and high levels of demoralization. Other than the pain scale, the total HHI score significantly correlated with the total scores of all rating scales and their subscales, as well as with the measure of personal religious practice. The "Meaning" FACIT-Sp subscale was found to be the main predictor of hope. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Since hope represents a core need and a tool for patients dealing with their illness, it is essential to implement stage-specific and realistic hope-facilitating interventions and support patients in their search for meaning, which promotes spiritual well-being and appears relevant in fostering hope.

Personality Traits and Sense of Dignity in End-of-Life Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

CONTEXT: Patients' personality traits can play an important role in the end-of-life care process. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between personality traits and dignity in cancer patients nearing death. In addition, the associations between personality traits and physical, psychological symptoms, and coping strategies during the end-of-life stage were explored. METHODS: The study is cross-sectional. The sample consisted of 210 participants with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) lower than 50 and a life expectancy of a few weeks. For each patient, personal and clinical data were collected and a set of validated rating scales, assessing personality, dignity, physical, psychological symptoms and coping strategies was administered during the first psychological consultation. RESULTS: The results highlighted significant associations between personality traits and dignity. In particular, Conscientiousness was negatively correlated with Social Support and Extroversion was negatively associated with Loss of Purpose and Meaning. Neuroticism was related to all the dimensions of dignity and Extroversion was significantly associated with the physical and psychological symptoms. Regarding coping styles, active coping strategies were predictors of Extroversion and Agreeableness. Conversely, anxiety symptoms predicted the Neuroticism trait. CONCLUSIONS: Personality traits seem to be actively involved into the loss of dignity. These findings highlighted the importance of including personality traits and dignity into the patient's care process. Exploring individual differences and coping mechanisms at the end-of-life could improve palliative care and lead to better patient-tailored psychological interventions.

The Spirituality in End-of-Life Cancer Patients, in Relation to Anxiety, Depression, Coping Strategies and the Daily Spiritual Experiences: A Cross-Sectional Study.

This study aimed to investigate "Faith" and "Meaning/Peace" dimensions of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp-12) in relation to coping strategies, anxiety and depression, and to analyze the relationship between FACIT-Sp-12 and the daily spiritual experience scale in end-of-life cancer patients. A sample of 152 participants were involved. The daily spiritual experiences correlated the most with "Faith" subscale. Moreover, religious coping, depression and daily spiritual experiences resulted "Faith" significant predictors, while depression, anxiety, self-distraction, positive reframing and behavioral disengagement were "Meaning/Peace" subscale's significant predictors. These findings highlighted the considerable impact of the daily spiritual experiences on patients' spiritual well-being.

Exploring demoralization in end-of-life cancer patients: Prevalence, latent dimensions, and associations with other psychosocial variables.

OBJECTIVE: Demoralization is an existential distress syndrome that consists of an incapacity of coping, helplessness, hopelessness, loss of meaning and purpose, and impaired self-esteem. It can affect cancer patients, and the Demoralization Scale is a valid instrument to assess it. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of demoralization in end-of-life cancer patients and its associations with the medical and psychosocial variables. In addition, the latent dimensions of demoralization emerging in this distinctive population were explored. METHOD: The study is cross-sectional. The sample consisted of 235 end-of-life cancer patients with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) lower than 50 and a life expectancy of a few weeks. For each patient, personal and medical data was gathered by a palliative physician and a set of validated rating scales, assessing demoralization, anxiety, depression, physical symptoms, pain, spiritual well-being, and dignity, was administered by a psychologist during the first consultation. RESULT: Sixty-four participants (27.2%) had low demoralization, 50.2% (n = 118) had medium demoralization, and 22.6% (n = 53) had high demoralization. Factor analysis evidenced a five-factor solution that identified the following demoralization factors: Emotional Distress and Inability to Cope, Loss of Purpose and Meaning, Worthlessness, Sense of Failure, and Dysphoria. All the considered variables were associated with demoralization, except for pain, nausea, breathing problems, and sociodemographic and clinical variables. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: End-of-life cancer patients showed higher levels of demoralization than has been reported in other studies with advanced cancer. These data could suggest that demoralization could increase in proximity to death and with impaired clinical condition. In particular, the five demoralization dimensions that emerged could represent the typical concerns around which the syndrome evolves in end-of-life cancer patients. Finally, spiritual well-being could play a protective role with respect to demoralization.

Dignity-related existential distress in end-of-life cancer patients: Prevalence, underlying factors, and associated coping strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients often have to face increasing levels of existential distress (ED) during disease progression, especially when nearing death. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence of the dignity-related existential distress (DR-ED) in a sample of end-of-life cancer patients, and to explore the "existential distress" Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-IT) subscale internal structure and its associations with different coping strategies. METHODS: Two hundred seven cancer inpatients with a Karnofsky Performance Status ≤50 and a life expectancy of 4 months or less have been examined with the following self-report measures: PDI-IT, Demoralization Scale (DS-IT) and Brief Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced (Brief-COPE). The existential distress PDI-IT subscale factor structure was explored through principal component analysis, and the DR-ED associations with the other considered variables were examined through X2 tests, MANOVA, and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Dignity-related existential distress was a problem/major problem for 18.8% of the patients, especially for the younger (F(1, 205) = 3.40; P = 0.020) and more demoralized (F(1, 205) = 20.36; P < 0.001) individuals. Factor analysis supported 2 dimensions labeled "self-discontinuity" and "loss of personal autonomy," accounting for 58% of the variance. Positive reframing (ß = -0.146, P < 0.05) and self-blame (ß = 0.247, P < 0.001) coping styles emerged as DR-ED significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed how DR-ED is a relevant problem for patients nearing death and furthermore highlighted 2 underlying factors. Finally, the research has shown that positive reframing and self-blame coping styles might be clinically relevant elements for interventions on ED.