Reactive thrombocytosis after caesarean section and vaginal delivery: implications for maternal thromboembolism and its prevention.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the duration and severity of reactive thrombocytosis after caesarean section and vaginal delivery. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: A large teaching hospital. METHODS: Women admitted for delivery at the Leicester Royal Infirmary were recruited into the study. The platelet count was measured before delivery and postnatally on days 3, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Women who had antepartum haemorrhage, postpartum haemorrhage and those delivered by instrumental delivery were excluded from the study. Sixty-five were recruited, and 45 completed the study, 20 of whom were delivered by a normal vaginal delivery and 25 by caesarean section. A random effects model was used to compare platelet counts within and between the two groups to assess the severity and the timing of reactive thrombocytosis. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in booking and pre-delivery platelet counts between the two groups (mean values 248.4 x 10(9)/L and 245 x 10(9)/L in the normal vaginal group and 269.4 x 10(9)/L and 251.6 x 10(9)/L in the caesarean section group, respectively). Postnatally, a rise in the platelet count was noted in the normal vaginal delivery group, reaching statistically significant peak values, compared with booking and pre-delivery at days 8 and 12 of the postnatal period (mean value 365.8 x 10(9)/L; P < 0.001 and 369.4 x 10(9)/L; P < 0.001 respectively). In the caesarean section group, the platelet count was raised to a statistically significant high value, compared with booking and pre-delivery at day 8 of the postnatal period. The platelet count peaked at days 12 and 16 of the postnatal period (mean value 522.5 x 10(9)/L; P < 0.0001 and 526.5 x 10(9)/L; P < 0.0001, respectively) and remained significantly higher than booking and predelivery values for 24 days after the caesarean section. There was a greater rise in the platelet count in the caesarean section group compared with the vaginal delivery group. The platelet counts in the caesarean section group were significantly higher than these in the normal vaginal delivery group from day 12 to day 24 of the postnatal period. CONCLUSION: A significant rise in platelet count occurred eight to twelve days after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section. The increase in platelet count continued to rise for 16 days after caesarean section, and it stayed significantly higher for more than 24 days after the delivery.

Genetic amniocentesis: gestation-specific pregnancy outcome and comparison of outcome following early and traditional amniocentesis.

Amniocentesis remains the most common prenatal diagnostic invasive procedure for fetal karyotyping. During counselling prior to this procedure miscarriage rates are often quoted as a single figure. In this review of 2924 amniocenteses, we report that miscarriage rates vary with the gestational age at which the procedure is performed. The total miscarriage rate was 1.0 per cent after early amniocenteses (11 + 0-14 + 6 weeks) and 1.2 per cent after traditional mid-trimester amniocenteses (15 + 0-18 + 6 weeks). The rate was greatest (3.1 per cent) for amniocenteses performed after 18 + 6 weeks' gestation. The cumulative miscarriage risk increased from 0.03 per cent one week after the procedure to plateau at 1.1 per cent five weeks after the procedure. The preterm and still-birth rates following amniocenteses were similar in early and traditional mid-trimester amniocenteses but were significantly higher when amniocenteses were performed after 19 weeks' gestation. Although the incidence of talipes equinovarus was higher after early amniocentesis compared with traditional mid-trimester amniocenteses (1.4 per cent versus 0.2 per cent), none of the affected infants required corrective surgery. We conclude that counselling for this procedure should be tailored to each unit's unintended fetal loss rate based on cumulative rates. Such figures should be available to parents to assist them in their decision-making.

Does midwifery-led intrapartum care require anaesthetic services?

The report of the Expert Maternity Group 'Changing Childbirth' (The Cumberlege Report) advocates a greater role for midwives in the care of the low risk pregnant woman, and has promoted much discussion about the future development of maternity services in the UK. At Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust the 'Home from Home' delivery scheme provides midwifery-led antenatal and intrapartum care of women with uncomplicated pregnancies. We have performed a retrospective review of the requirements for anaesthetic services in this unit. During the 12 month review period 1610 women were admitted to the 'Home from Home' delivery scheme in labour. One hundred and eighty one women subsequently received anaesthetic intervention. Of this group, 137 (77.0%) required an epidural, 17 (9.6%) a spinal, 18 (10.1%) a general anaesthetic, 5 (2.8%) an epidural and a general anaesthetic and 1 (0.6%) an epidural and a spinal. Our results demonstrate that low risk pregnant women in labour being cared for in a midwifery led unit have a considerable need for anaesthesia and analgesia.