Association of Brain-Dead Donors' Terminal Inflammation With Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation affects kidney function in a wide range of diseases. Even in kidney transplant recipients, higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) are invariably associated with both worse short- and long-term graft outcomes. However, little is known about systemic inflammation in kidney donors and, notably, brain death causes a strong systemic inflammatory response. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the role of systemic inflammation of brain-dead donors on short-term kidney graft outcomes (ie, delayed graft function [DGF], defined as the need of dialysis during the first week after transplantation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical and biochemical characteristics of all brain-dead kidney donors generated in the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona in the 2006 to 2015 period (n = 194). Donors who were tested for CRP in the 24 hours before BD declaration were included (n = 97, 50% of initial population). Clinical and biochemical features of their respective recipients (n = 165) were analyzed, comparing recipients who developed DGF (n = 30) with recipients who did not (n = 135). RESULTS: Donors whose recipients later developed DGF had much higher CRP values (10.58 [5.1-18.21] vs 4.81 [1.42-12.2] mg/dL, P = .025). Other characteristics associated with the development of DGF were renal biopsy score and recipient dialysis vintage (P = .025 and P = .002, respectively). In logistic regression analysis, PCR maintained significance in the non-expanded criteria donor (ECD) group (odds ratio [OR], 1.102; P = .027), but it lost significance in the ECD group (P = .67). CONCLUSIONS: Terminal donor CRP was associated with DGF in kidney transplant recipients and proved to be mostly significant in younger donors.

Estimation of renal function by CKD-EPI versus MDRD in a cohort of HIV-infected patients: a cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Accurately determining renal function is essential for clinical management of HIV patients. Classically, it has been evaluated by estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the MDRD-equation, but today there is evidence that the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation has greater diagnostic accuracy. To date, however, little information exists on patients with HIV-infection. This study aimed to evaluate eGFR by CKD-EPI vs. MDRD equations and to stratify renal function according to KDIGO guidelines. METHODS: Cross-sectional, single center study including adult patients with HIV-infection. RESULTS: Four thousand five hundred three patients with HIV-infection (864 women; 19%) were examined. Median age was 45 years (IQR 37-52), and median baseline creatinine was 0.93 mg/dL (IQR 0.82-1.05). A similar distribution of absolute measures of eGFR was found using both formulas (p = 0.548). Baseline median eGFR was 95.2 and 90.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 for CKD-EPI and MDRD equations (p < 0.001), respectively. Of the 4503 measurements, 4109 (91.2%) agreed, with a kappa index of 0.803. MDRD classified 7.3% of patients as "mild reduced GFR" who were classified as "normal function" with CKD-EPI. Using CKD-EPI, it was possible to identify "normal function" (>90 mL/min/1.73 m2) in 73% patients and "mild reduced GFR" (60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2) in 24.3% of the patients, formerly classified as >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 with MDRD. CONCLUSIONS: There was good correlation between CKD-EPI and MDRD. Estimating renal function using CKD-EPI equation allowed better staging of renal function and should be considered the method of choice. CKD-EPI identified a significant proportion of patients (24%) with mild reduced GFR (60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Early Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitor- to Everolimus-Based Therapy Following Kidney Transplantation: Results of the Randomized ELEVATE Trial.

In a 24-month, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, 715 de novo kidney transplant recipients were randomized at 10-14 weeks to convert to everolimus (n = 359) or remain on standard calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy (n = 356; 231 tacrolimus; 125 cyclosporine), all with mycophenolic acid and steroids. The primary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 12, was similar for everolimus versus CNI: mean (standard error) 0.3(1.5) mL/min/1.732 versus -1.5(1.5) mL/min/1.732 (p = 0.116). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at month 12 was more frequent under everolimus versus CNI overall (9.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.014) and versus tacrolimus-treated patients (2.6%, p < 0.001) but similar to cyclosporine-treated patients (8.8%, p = 0.755). Reporting on de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) was limited but suggested more frequent anti-HLA Class I DSA under everolimus. Change in left ventricular mass index was similar. Discontinuation due to adverse events was more frequent with everolimus (23.6%) versus CNI (8.4%). In conclusion, conversion to everolimus at 10-14 weeks posttransplant was associated with renal function similar to that with standard therapy overall. Rates of BPAR were low in all groups, but lower with tacrolimus than everolimus.

Desensitization Before Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in Highly HLA-Sensitized Patients: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation in highly sensitized patients represents a major clinical challenge leading to long periods on the waiting list. When a living donor is available, the use of different strategies to desensitize recipients with preformed human leukocyte antigen antibodies can allow a successful transplantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study including all living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) with desensitization (DS) from 2008 to 2014 in our transplant unit. The rates of rejection and graft survival were evaluated. DS consisted of plasma exchange (PE), rituximab (RTX), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) induction with thymoglobulin and maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2014, we performed 368 LDKT, with 31 receiving desensitization. Seven cases from a clinical trial were excluded. Demographic data and outcomes were recorded. All of the patients received RTX + PE + IVIG. DS was performed for positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-match (4.2%), T-cell- and/or B-cell-positive flow cytometry cross-match (87.5%) and presence of donor-specific antibodies alone (8.3%). We identified 23 episodes of rejection in 12 patients (50%); 79% were antibody-mediated rejections (AMR). Graft failure was 12.5%, with a mean time to graft loss of 229 ± 203 days. Mean follow-up was 37 ± 27 months, and graft survival was 91% and 86% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Desensitization in LDKT appears to offer an acceptable option for highly sensitized patients. In our series, 41% presented an AMR and 12.5% showed transplant glomerulopathy in protocol and/or indication biopsies. However, short-term outcomes and graft survival were satisfactory.

Desensitization in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation With Low ABO Iso-Agglutinin Titers.

BACKGROUND: In ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) with low iso-agglutinin (IG) titers (IGT), standard pre-conditioning treatment might be excessive. To try to answer this question, we evaluated the pre-conditioning requirements of a group of ABOi KT with low ABO IGT in our center. Our main objective was to assess desensitization requirements for ABOi KT with low IGT (<16) at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 2006 to 2014. METHODS: A retrospective study of desensitization (rituximab and plasma exchange [PE]) requirements for ABOi KT with IGT <16 was conducted. RESULTS: One and 5 years after KT, patient survival was 100%. Renal graft survival was 90% at 1 and 5 years after KT. Mean PE performed before KT was 1.7 (standard deviation [SD], 1.703); 50% of the patients did not receive PE after transplantation, 30% received 2 sessions of PE, and 20% received only 1. The average is 0.8 (SD, 0.91).Follow-up IG determinations remained with low titers (≤8/8). No rebounds of titers were observed during the first 4 to 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients with IGT ≤8 required none or only 1 PE session to reach acceptable titers (titers ≤4) to perform ABOi KT safely. This information is useful to assess the possibility of a minimized desensitization protocol in ABOi KT donors with low titers of IG to reduce adverse effects, reduce cost, and simplify pre-transplant logistics.

Pre-Emptive Retransplantation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Graft Failure.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the group of patients receiving a new kidney transplant before starting dialysis again (pre-reTR) with a group of patients receiving a new kidney transplant after restarting dialysis (reTR). METHODS: This retrospective cohort included all the kidney retransplantations (second transplantations) between 2000 and 2012 performed at our center and their follow-up until July 2014. We analysed graft and patient survival, rejection rates, and immunologic parameters of these patients. RESULTS: We studied 18 patients who had pre-reTR and 83 who had reTR. In the pre-reTR group no patient had panel-reactive assay (PRA) >10% at any time. In the reTR group 26.5% had PRA >10% at the time of transplantation (P = .014) and 54.2% had a historical highest PRA >10% (P < .001). The rejection rate was 11.1% in the pre-reTR group and 27.7% in the reTR group during the first year post-retransplantation (P = .227). Patient survival rate was 100% in the pre-reTR group at 5 years of follow-up, whereas in the reTR group at 1 year it was 95.2% and 85.9% at 5 years after retransplantation. Allograft survival at 1 and 5 years was 88% and 89%, respectively, in the pre-reTR group. On the other hand, in the reTR group it was 89% after the first year and 65% at 5 years post-retransplantation. CONCLUSION: Pre-emptive renal retransplantation is a feasible option that should be assessed in patients with kidney graft failure and may help to minimize the morbidity associated with dialysis reinitiation.

Living Donor Transplantation: Long-Term Evolution Related to Age Matching.

The lack of donors is favoring living kidney donor (LKD) transplantation worldwide, quite often beyond the classic age-matching rules. We analysed renal function (RF) at 1 and 5 years in all donor and recipients as well as death-censored graft and patient survival. LKD recipients were divided into 4 subgroups: young recipients-young donors (YR-YD; N = 355), elderly recipients-young donors (ER-YD; N = 13), young recipients-elderly donors (YR-ED; N = 67), and elderly recipients-elderly donors (ER-ED; N = 38). "Elderly" was defined as ≥60 years. RF was better in those who received a young allograft (YR-YD/ER-YD) at any time (P < .001). There was a trend toward higher proteinuria among the recipients of an old allograft (YR-ED/ER-ED) at any time (P = not significant [NS]). However, our population showed low levels of proteinuria and this was not a risk factor for graft failure. Logistic regression model showed that creatinine level at 1 year is a good predictor of graft losses. Graft survival was worse in the allografts from elderly donors (P < .001). Analysing the young recipients, renal survival was inferior in those who received an old kidney (YR-ED; P < .00005) as well as mortality rates at 14 years (P = .03). The RF of young (N = 295) and elderly donors (N = 98) was optimal with no progression to ESRD or deaths registered during follow-up. In conclusion, young recipients of elderly kidneys pay the price of a worse RF, allograft prognosis, and patient prognosis. The pair YR-ED is a doable option, but we recommend age matching when it is possible.

Impact of urinary tract infections on short-term kidney graft outcome.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are frequent after renal transplantation, but their impact on short-term graft outcome is not well established. All kidney transplants performed between July 2003 and December 2010 were investigated to evaluate the impact of UTI on graft function at 1 year after transplantation. Of 867 patients who received a kidney transplant, 184 (21%) developed at least one episode of UTI, at a median of 18 days after transplantation. The prevalence of acute graft pyelonephritis (AGP) was 15%. The most frequent pathogens identified were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 37% of which were considered to be multidrug-resistant strains. Thirty-eight patients (4%) lost their grafts, 225 patients (26%) had graft function impairment and the 1-year mortality rate was 3%; however, no patient died as a consequence of a UTI. Surgical re-intervention and the development of at least one episode of AGP were independently associated with 1-year graft function impairment. Moreover, the development of at least one episode of AGP was associated with graft loss at 1 year. Patients with AGP caused by a resistant strain had graft function impairment more frequently, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (53% vs. 36%, p 0.07). Neither asymptomatic bacteriuria nor acute uncomplicated UTI were associated with graft function impairment in multivariate analysis. To conclude, UTIs are frequent in kidney transplant recipients, especially in the early post-transplantation period. Although AGP was significantly associated with kidney graft function impairment and 1-year post-transplantation graft loss, lower UTIs did not affect graft function.

Clinical features and outcomes of tuberculosis in transplant recipients as compared with the general population: a retrospective matched cohort study.

There are no previous studies comparing tuberculosis in transplant recipients (TRs) with other hosts. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of tuberculosis in TRs and patients from the general population. Twenty-two TRs who developed tuberculosis from 1996 through 2010 at a tertiary hospital were included. Each TR was matched by age, gender and year of diagnosis with four controls selected from among non-TR non-human immunodeficiency virus patients with tuberculosis. TRs (21 patients, 96%) had more factors predisposing to tuberculosis than non-TRs (33, 38%) (p <0.001). Pulmonary tuberculosis was more common in non-TRs (77 (88%) vs. 12 TRs (55%); p 0.001); disseminated tuberculosis was more frequent in TRs (five (23%) vs. four non-TRs (5%); p 0.005). Time from clinical suspicion of tuberculosis to definitive diagnosis was longer in TRs (median of 14 days) than in non-TRs (median of 0 days) (p <0.001), and invasive procedures were more often required (12 (55%) TRs and 15 (17%) non-TRs, respectively; p 0.001). Tuberculosis was diagnosed post-mortem in three TRs (14%) and in no non-TRs (p <0.001). Rates of toxicity associated with antituberculous therapy were 38% in TRs (six patients) and 10% (seven patients) in non-TRs (p 0.014). Tuberculosis-related mortality rates in TRs and non-TRs were 18% and 6%, respectively (p 0.057). The adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that the only predictor of tuberculosis-related mortality was a higher number of organs with tuberculosis involvement (adjusted hazard ratio 8.6; 95% CI 1.2-63). In conclusion, manifestations of tuberculosis in TRs differ from those in normal hosts. Post-transplant tuberculosis resists timely diagnosis, and is associated with a higher risk of death before a diagnosis can be made.

Economic analysis of the treatment of end-stage renal disease treatment: living-donor kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major public health problem in the Spanish health system. Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice, offering better survival and cost-effectiveness than other alternatives. This study aimed to compare the cost of living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) during the first year after transplantation with that of hemodialysis (HD). METHOD: A prospective, descriptive study of cost and efficacy was performed in the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona from January to December 2011. We included 106 patients (57 undergoing HD and 49 receiving a LDKT). The costs of LDKT (donor and recipient) and HD were calculated based on our economic database program. RESULTS: The mean age of recipients and donors was 46 ± 15 and 52 ± 10 years, respectively, and 67% of the recipients were men. In HD patients, the mean age was 67 ± 11 years and 62% were men. The total cost of LDKT was €29,897.91 (€8,128.44 for donors and €21,769.47 for recipients). The total cost of HD was €43,000.88 (€37,917 for HD and related procedures plus €5,082 for transport). LDKT represented a savings of €13,102.97 per patient/year and the payback period was less than 1 year. Quality-adjusted life years were higher in LDKT than in HD patients. CONCLUSION: LDKT is cost effective during the first year after transplantation and is associated with enhanced quality of life. From both the medical and economic points of view, pre-emptive LDKD should be encouraged in Spain to reduce the health budget for ESRD.

Polyclonal versus monoclonal induction therapy in a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: a comparison of efficacy and costs.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy in renal transplantation reduces the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in expanded criteria donation (ECD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD). We compared the efficacy of Thymoglobulin (Sanofi-Aventis, Spain), ATG Fresenius (ATG-Fresenius, Spain), and Simulect (Novartis Farm, Spain) in a calcineurin-free protocol in ECD and DCD renal transplantation by evaluating patient survival, graft survival, and AR at 1 year and overall costs. METHODS: An observational retrospective study was performed using our database of 289 consecutive cadaveric ECD renal transplant recipients (n = 178) and DCD recipients (n = 111) from April 1999 to December 2011. Induction therapy consisted of Simulect, Thymoglobulin, and ATG Fresenius. Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free maintenance therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil or sodium and steroids. RESULTS: There were no differences in the patients' demographic characteristics or patient and graft survival. One-year AR rates were equivalent (ECD: 10%, 19.1%, 17.7% versus DCD: 14.3%, 7.1%, 16.7%). Leukopenia and thrombopenia were significantly more frequent in the ECD group treated with polyclonal induction. The average total cost of transplantation was higher in the ECD group but there were no significant differences in the average total cost between ECD and DCD: 39,970.31 ± 7,732€ versus 35,058.34 ± 6,801€ (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Our study shows the same efficacy with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody induction and a CNI-free treatment regimen in ECD and DCD renal transplantation with no differences in overall costs at 1 year after transplantation.

Coagulation profiles of unexpected DCDD donors do not indicate a role for exogenous fibrinolysis.

It has been suggested that vascular stasis during cardio-circulatory arrest leads to the formation of microvascular thrombi and the viability of organs arising from donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) donors may be improved through the application of fibrinolytic therapy. Our aim was to comprehensively study the coagulation profiles of Maastricht category II DCDD donors in order to determine the presence of coagulation abnormalities that could benefit from fibrinolytic therapy. Whole blood from potential DCDD donors suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was sampled after declaration of death in the emergency department, and rotational thromboelastomeric analysis was performed. Between July 2012 and December 2013, samples from 33 potential DCDD donors were analyzed. All patients demonstrated hyperfibrinolysis (HF), as reflected by maximum clot lysis of 98-100% in all cases, indicating that there is no role for additional fibrinolytic therapy in this setting. As well, we observed correlations between thromboelastomeric lysis parameters and maximum hepatic transaminase levels measured in potential donors and renal artery flows measured during ex situ hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion, indicating that further studies on the utility of thromboelastometry to evaluate organ injury and perhaps even viability in unexpected DCDD may be warranted.

Impact of antibiotic resistance on the development of recurrent and relapsing symptomatic urinary tract infection in kidney recipients.

We sought to determine the frequency, risk factors, and clinical impact of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients. Of 867 patients who received a kidney transplant between 2003 and 2010, 174 (20%) presented at least one episode of UTI. Fifty-five patients presented a recurrent UTI (32%) and 78% of them could be also considered relapsing episodes. Recurrent UTI was caused by extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (31%), followed by non-ESBL producing Escherichia coli (15%), multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14%), and ESBL-producing E. coli (13%). The variables associated with a higher risk of recurrent UTI were a first or second episode of infection by MDR bacteria (OR 12; 95%CI 528), age >60 years (OR 2.2; 95%CI 1.15.1), and reoperation (OR 3; 95%CI 1.37.1). In addition, more relapses were recorded in patients with UTI caused by MDR organisms than in those with susceptible microorganisms. There were no differences in acute rejection, graft function, graft loss or 1 year mortality between groups. In conclusion, recurrent UTI is frequent among kidney recipients and associated with MDR organism. Classic risk factors for UTI (female gender and diabetes) are absent in kidney recipients, thus highlighting the relevance of uropathogens in this population.

Spanish consensus document for acceptance and rejection of kidneys from expanded criteria donors.

In the recent years, more than 60% of available deceased donors are either older than 50 yr or have significant vascular comorbidities. This makes the acceptance and rejection criteria of renal allografts very rigorous, especially in cases of younger recipients, and at the same time encourages live donations. In our country, there is a lack of homogeneity in the percentages of use of expanded criteria donor (ECD) allografts between the different autonomous communities. Furthermore, the criteria vary greatly, and in some cases, great importance is given to the biopsy while in others very little. In this study, we present a unified and homogenous criteria agreed upon by consensus of a 10-member Panel representing major scientific societies related to renal transplantation in Spain. The criteria are to be used in accepting and/or rejecting kidneys from the so-called ECDs. The goal was to standardize the use of these organs, to optimize the results, and most importantly to provide for the maximum well being of our patients. Finally, we believe that after taking into account the Panel's thorough review of specific scientific literature, this document will be adaptable to other national renal transplant programmes.

Long-term follow-up after conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporin in renal transplant patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between anticalcineurin (CNI) drugs and the development new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation (NODAT) is well established. Among these agents cyclosporine shows lesser diabetogenicity than tacrolimus. It has been described that conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine improves glycemic control; however, there are no studies showing whether this reduced risk is maintained upon long-term follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether CNI drugs conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine helps to maintain better glycemic control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the evolution of glucose metabolism at 5 years after conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in eight patients (six men) with NODAT. Mean age was 42.8 ± 15 years, and time after transplantation to conversion 128 ± 40 months. We analyzed fasting serum glucose, lipid metabolism, renal function, and cyclosporine levels at 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after conversion. RESULTS: At 6 months after conversion, improved glucose metabolism was observed (268 ± 161 versus 121 ± 31 mg/dL; P < .01) although it was minimal in one case with persistent high blood glycemic levels. Only two patients maintained a normal glucose at the end of follow-up. Five subjects showed increased glycemia at 12 to 24 months after conversion requiring antidiabetic therapy: three patients, insulin and two oral antidiabetic agents. Two patients lost their allografts due to chronic rejection at 32 and 50 months respectively. Among the other six patients, renal function remained stable (1.9 ± 0.6 versus 2.11 ± 0.97 mg/dL; P = NS). There was no significant differences among the other variables. Cyclosporine levels remained stable during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Conversion of renal transplant patients with NODAT from tacrolimus to cyclosporine improves glucose metabolism in the short term but glycemia increases thereafter.

PP106. Risk of long term renal graft loss after pregnancy in renal transplant recipients immunosuppressed with calcineurin inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Intron long-term graft function are uncertain. Although there have been a large number of successful pregnancies in renal graft recipients, the effects of pregnancy and type of immunosuppressant drugs. OBJECTIVES: To analyze (1) the impact of pregnancy on the long term renal function and graft survival of kidney transplant recipients (KTx), and (2) the impact og the pregnancy in (KTx) immunosupressed with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of two cohorts: one (PG) formed by all the KTx recipients from our institution that became pregnant between 1973 and 2004, and the other one (NPG) formed by, when possible, up two KTx patients of similar demographic and clinical characteristics: patient age, donor source, donor age, interval between KTx and pregnancy (or a matched interval for NPG), baseline renal function before pregnancy, hypertension, proteinuria >1g, and CNI-based immunosuppression. but without pregnancies. Particular attention has been paid to long-term (5 and 10years) renal function and graft survival. Males were selected to complete NPG if no matched women were available. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Assessment of baseline homogeneity between the two cohorts was performed by appropriate analysis. Time of survival of kidney was estimated by means Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to perform adjusted analysis. RESULTS: Fifty five pregnancies in 43 patients (PG) and 68 paired controls (NPG) were included in the study. The basal and functional characteristics of PG before pregnancy and NPG were not statistical and clinical significantly different. In a univariate Cox regression analysis, 10 years graft survival after pregnancy/study entry was significantly better in CG (79.9%) than PG (60.9%) (P=0.02). Multivariate analysis of graft survival showed an increased risk of long-term graft loss in pregnant women that had been treated with CNI as immunosuppressant drug compared with NP KTx that received CNIs (HR: 2.4, 95% CI, 1.17-5.00; P=0.02). In a stratified analysis, evaluating separately the recipients that had received or not CNIs, the risk of graft loss was only increased among recipients that became pregnant post-transplantation treated with CNI compared with recipients that had received CNIs but had not become pregnant (HR: 3.3, 95% CI, 1.42-7.45; P=0.005), but not among recipients that became pregnant post-transplantation and received other immunosuppressant agents (HR: 0.9, 95% CI, 0.24-3.80; P=0.94). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy in women receiving baseline immunosuppression with CNI significantly increases the risk of long-term graft loss, non observed in KTx patients treated with CNI that not became pregnant, nor in KTx patients that became pregnant but are treated with other immunosuppressant drugs . At our knowledge, this observation has not been previously reported.

De novo use of everolimus with elimination or minimization of cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of two similarly designed multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, open-label studies was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) elimination versus minimization from an everolimus-CsA-steroid regimen in de novo renal transplant patients. METHODS: Within 24 hours after transplantation, 170 renal transplant patients received everolimus (trough levels 3-8 ng/mL), CsA, and steroids. Those eligible (n = 114) were randomized (1:1) at 3 months to have CsA elimination by month 4 to 6 (±1 week) with everolimus trough levels maintained at 6 to 12 ng/mL or CsA minimization, until 12 months. The randomized population excluded those who discontinued the study prior to randomization due to adverse events, acute rejection episodes of Banff grade IIb/III, or worsening renal function during the month prior to randomization. RESULTS: At 12 months, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell) with CsA elimination was noninferior versus CsA minimization (P < .0001, α-level 0.05; 90% confidence interval 0.6-8.5) by 7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (noninferiority margin). Composite efficacy failure was comparable with CsA elimination and CsA minimization (18.9% and 17.5%, respectively, P = 1.000) and no graft loss or death was reported after randomization. Cytomegalovirus infections were rare under everolimus treatment, and no pneumonitis episode was reported. CONCLUSION: In our selected randomized study population, immediate initiation of everolimus allowed CsA elimination. Renal function was stable on everolimus-based, CsA-free maintenance regimen without compromising efficacy.

Preemptive use of Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in living donor transplantation.

UNLABELLED: Sirolimus (SRL) has demonstrated beneficial impacts on the development of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). In living donor transplantation, strategies mostly seek to prevent graft dysfunction and respond to a decline in renal function. The present study focused on proactive, preemptive SRL administration for patients with repeated renal transplantations and those engrafted with an extended criteria donor organ. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, monocenter study describes 7 renal transplant recipients with stable graft function receiving SRL within the first year posttransplantation and 3 recipients of second transplantations who started SRL treatment before obtaining their repeat grafts. RESULTS: A proactive use of SRL revealed stable renal function parameters at 1 year after SRL introduction: Creatinine 1.33 ± 0.21 mg/dL; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation glomerular filtration rate, 57 ± 19 mL/min; PU 452 ± 338 mg/24 hours. Cell counts, hemoglobin concentrations, as well as triglyceride and total cholesterol levels did not differ over the 1-year follow-up. SRL administration before retransplantation provided good graft survival and renal function with a creatinine of 1.2 ± .32 mg/dL, MDRD of 60 ± 28 mg/dL, and PU 502 ± 432 mg/24 hour. Cell counts, hemoglobin concentrations, as well as triglyceride and total cholesterol levels did not differ over 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Preemptive SRL-induction before signs of graft deterioration or chronic injury may be a useful approach to prevent CAD.

Kidney transplantation and waiting list for renal transplantation for human immunodeficiency virus patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the experience of a renal transplantation unit in the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: A prospective study was performed between 2005 and 2010 among 23 patients with ESRD. RESULTS: In this study 83% of HIV-infected patients with ESRD were included on the waiting list for renal transplantation with 4 patients in a clinical evaluation phase. During the follow-up, 52% of waiting list patients (n = 11) received a renal transplant, and 1 patient underwent a simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Among the waiting list group we observed a significant later exclusion (43%; n = 3). Among the transplanted group there was a high but clinically inconsequential prevalence of acute tubular necrosis (36%; n = 4) and acute rejection episodes (36%; n = 4). The renal function showed a serum creatinine of 1.1 mg/dL at a follow-up of 24 + 12 months. All patients on the waiting list and after the transplantation are prescribed combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) with a low viral load <50 with CD4 >200. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-infected patients with ESRD should be considered to be candidates for renal transplantation if they meet the HIV inclusion criteria. Renal transplantation in adequately selected HIV-infected patients is a safe procedure with acceptable patient and graft survivals.

Comparative transcriptional and phenotypic peripheral blood analysis of kidney recipients under cyclosporin A or sirolimus monotherapy.

Due to its low level of nephrotoxicity and capacity to harness tolerogenic pathways, sirolimus (SRL) has been proposed as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors in transplantation. The exact mechanisms underlying its unique immunosuppressive profile in humans, however, are still not well understood. In the current study, we aimed to depict the in vivo effects of SRL in comparison with cyclosporin A (CSA) by employing gene expression profiling and multiparameter flow cytometry on blood cells collected from stable kidney recipients under immunosuppressant monotherapy. SRL recipients displayed an increased frequency of CD4 + CD25highFoxp3 + T cells. However, this was accompanied by an increased number of effector memory T cells and by enrichment in NFkB-related pro-inflammatory expression pathways and monocyte and NK cell lineage-specific transcripts. Furthermore, measurement of a transcriptional signature characteristic of operationally tolerant kidney recipients failed to detect differences between SRL and CSA-treated recipients. In conclusion, we show here that the blood transcriptional profile induced by SRL monotherapy in vivo does not resemble that of operationally tolerant recipients and is dominated by innate immune cells and NFkB-related pro-inflammatory events. These data provide novel insights on the complex effects of SLR on the immune system in clinical transplantation.