A Different Approach for Protruding Earlobe Correction-Modified Fish-tail Technique.

BACKGROUND: Protruding ears are the most common auricular abnormalities seen in children (1). Protruding ears are a condition that has social and psychological consequences due to its physical appearance and one of the main causes of peer bullying at young ages (2). While various surgical methods exist to address prominent ears, the options for correcting the lobule are relatively scarce. In this study, we are aimed to present the modified fish-tail technique that we have developed and to compare it with other techniques in the literature. METHODS: The patients were selected from the cases that underwent otoplasty for prominent ear correction in our clinic between 2020 and 2022. A total of 21 cases that required protruded lobule correction during otoplasty were included in our study. Keloid and hypertrophic scar formation, wound dehiscence, hematoma, infection and recurrence in the lobule were evaluated. The patients were followed up for at least 1 year for early and late complications. RESULTS: Each patient in the study underwent bilateral prominent ear correction, including bilateral modified fish-tail technique. All cases were followed for at least 12 months. There was no wound dehiscence, infection, recurrence in lobule prominence or hematoma during the follow-up period. No hypertrophic scar or keloid was observed in any case. CONCLUSIONS: Our method stands out for its ability to achieve both adjustable vertical height and effective lobule correction with a reduced need for skin excision. We recommend the modified fish-tail technique as an alternative technique for prominent lobule surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The effect of reduction mammaplasty on the vertebral column: a radiologic study.

Some studies emphasized that anatomic mechanisms of vertebral aberrations could be associated with large breasts. The effect of mammaplasty operation on the vertebral column and body posture seems to be beneficial; in this trial, it was planned to investigate the objective radiologic effect of reduction mammaplasty on the posture of the vertebral column in a group of patients operated due to the large breasts. Thirty-four white women with large breasts were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into three groups according to their breast cup sizes. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the lumbosacral and thoracic spine were taken at baseline preoperatively, and the same radiographic images were taken in an average of 12 months later than the reduction mammaplasty operation. All were evaluated and compared for thoracic kyphosis angle and lumbar lordosis angle both preoperatively and postoperatively. The mean thoracic kyphosis angle was 40,53 preoperatively and 39,38 postoperatively. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative measurements in all groups (P > 0,05). The mean lumbar lordosis angle was 54,71 preoperatively and 53,18 postoperatively. Regarding the preoperative and postoperative measurements of lumbar lordosis angles, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups (P > 0,05). Although breast size may be an important factor that affects body posture, reduction mammaplasty operations have little or no radiologic effect on the vertebral column.