Hemodialysis Patients with Pruritus and Insomnia Have Increased Risk of Death.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus and insomnia are common disorders in hemodialysis (HD) patients, with a major clinical impact as they are associated with poor quality of life and increased mortality. Their coexistence and impact on survival in HD patients have rarely been investigated. Our aim is to investigate the survival of HD patients presenting either none, one, or both disorders and to compare certain features between these groups. METHODS: After the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 170 patients treated by HD or online hemodiafiltration were assigned in 4 study groups depending on the presence of either, neither, or both pruritus and insomnia. We analyzed the survival difference between groups after 20 months, and we searched if there were significant differences in terms of clinical and laboratory features. RESULTS: Survival at 20 months was lower in patients with both pruritus and insomnia. Patients with pruritus alone had a lower Kt/V than those with no complaints or insomnia alone. Those with no complaints had lower C-reactive protein and higher albumin levels than patients with insomnia alone or both conditions. CONCLUSION: Pruritus and insomnia should be actively investigated and correlated with some clinical and laboratory features as they have a significant impact on survival in HD patients.

Insomnia, muscular cramps and pruritus have low intensity in hemodialysis patients with good dialysis efficiency, low inflammation and arteriovenous fistula.

INTRODUCTION: Insomnia, muscular cramps, pruritus and postdialysis recovery time (RT) are quality-of-life parameters that affect hemodialysis (HD) patients physically and mentally. METHODS: We included 171 end-stage renal disease patients: 115 on high-flux HD and 56 on online hemodiafiltration (HDF). Patients were asked "How long does it take you to recover from a dialysis session?" and they evaluated intensity (absent, mild, medium and severe) of insomnia, muscular cramps and pruritus in the past 4 weeks. We sought associations of RT, insomnia, muscular cramps and pruritus with themselves and age, dialysis vintage, sex, body mass index, hemoglobin, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), Daugirdas single-pool Kt/V (Kt/V), ultrafiltration volume, blood processed volume and vascular access type. RESULTS: Insomnia absence correlated with muscular cramps absence (p = 0.01), arteriovenous fistula (AVF) presence (p = 0.02) and lower CRP (p = 0.003). Muscular cramps absence associated pruritus absence (p = 0.007) and AVF (p = 0.001). Absent pruritus patients were younger (p = 0.04), had higher Kt/V (p = 0.01) and more AVF (p = 0.02). Men insomnia was more severe in HD than HDF and albumin related (p = 0.007), while CRP was lower in absent pruritus. Women insomnia associated with muscular cramps (p = 0.04) and vascular access (p = 0.03), as was pruritus (p = 0.03). RT had no relations with any parameter. CONCLUSIONS: HD patients with AVF have less insomnia, muscular cramps and pruritus. Insomnia is associated with muscular cramps and inflammation. Pruritus is worse in older patients, is diminished with increased dialysis efficiency and is associated with higher CRP in men. There is no difference between HD and HDF patients, except more severe insomnia for HD in men.

Serum hyaluronic acid in chronic viral hepatitis B and C: a biomarker for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hemodialysis patients.

PURPOSE: Serum hyaluronic acid (sHA) is studied as a noninvasive marker of liver fibrosis (F) in chronic B and C viral hepatitis in general population but less in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: We evaluated sHA as a noninvasive biomarker of F in a multicenter prospective, transversal, and observational study which included 52 end-stage renal disease patients with chronic B (14) and C (38) viral hepatitis (age 55.57 ± 14.46 years, dialysis vintage 132.59 ± 86.02 months). RESULTS: Of the noninvasive tests analyzed, only sHA, APRI, and FIB4 index were able to differentiate patients with F1 (sHA p = 0.006; APRI p = 0.031; FIB4 p = 0.016). No statistically significant differences were found between sHA and APRI, ASAT/ALAT ratio, and FIB4 index in detecting F1 a (p > 0.02). sHA seemed to be more efficient than APRI, ASAT/ALAT ratio, and FIB4 index, having the highest estimated AUC value. The sHA threshold value for F1 was equal to 33.46 ng/mL, with the following estimated values of the performance indicators: Se 88.46 % and Sp 50 %. sHA was the only noninvasive test of the studied tests that could determine F2 (p = 0.002), with a threshold value of 80.24 ng/mL (Se 63 %, Sp 88 %), and F3 (p = 0.008), with a threshold value of 88.54 ng/mL (Se 60 %, Sp 84 %). None of the studied noninvasive tests could determine F4. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic B and C viral hepatitis undergoing hemodialysis, sHA may be a useful biomarker for the liver fibrosis grades: F1-mild, F2-moderate, and F3-severe, but it does not differentiate between chronic hepatitis (F1-F3) and liver cirrhosis (F4).

Variation of clinical and laboratory features in chronic dialysis patients treated with high-flux hemodialysis after switching to online hemodiafiltration.

PURPOSE: The study of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) benefits over high-flux hemodialysis (HD) raises great interest. The purpose was to compare clinical and laboratory parameters in patients treated with HD who were switched to HDF. METHODS: Forty-eight HD patients (study group) were switched to HDF, while other 521 patients remained on HD as a control group. During last 6 HD months and during first year of HDF, we determined in both groups the following parameters: monthly-weekly dialysis time, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), interdialytic body weight gain (IBWG), blood flow rate (Qb), weekly erythropoietin-stimulating agents dose (EPO), single-pool Kt/V, calcium, phosphorus (P), hemoglobin and normalized protein catabolic ration (nPCR), plus every 3 months--albumin, parathormone (PTH), ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT). In both groups, parameters in the last 6 HD months were compared to those in the first 6 months and, respectively, to those in the first year of HDF. RESULTS: In the study group, albumin and nPCR were significantly higher in the HD period not only compared to the first 6 months of HDF, but also compared to the first year of HDF. IBWG and P were higher with HD compared to the first year of HDF, but not with the first 6 months. PTH, Kt/V, Qb and EPO were higher in both HDF periods. In the control group, albumin was significantly higher in the first 6 months after the switch, but it was significantly lower in the first year. BMI, ferritin, PTH, Kt/V, Qb, TSAT and weekly dialysis time were higher in both HDF periods, while nPCR, EPO, SBP and DBP were lower. IBWG and Hb rose only during the first year after the switch, while P was lower in the first year, but not in the first 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition, assessed by albumin, nPCR and BMI, was not improved by HDF compared to HD. With HDF, Kt/V and phosphorus control were better, similar results were observed in the control group. A larger EPO dose was needed with HDF for maintaining a similar hemoglobin level.