RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: While selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) was originally described as a multilevel approach, single-level approaches are now popularized. Conus localization is beneficial for operative planning in single-level selective dorsal rhizotomy. Our approach to SDR involves minimal exposure for a single-level laminoplasty, preserving one attached interspinous ligament. Pre-operative conus localization is required for this tailored approach to determine the laminoplasty level and dictate rostral or caudal division of the superior spinus ligament. While rapid MRI sequences have been popularized for pediatric cranial imaging, its utility for spinal imagining is less well-described, and specific application for conus localization has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: Illustrate that rapid MRI without sedation is sufficient to identify conus level for tailored single-level laminoplasty SDR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing SDR from 2014 to 2022 at one institution were reviewed for type of pre-operative MRI (rapid vs full), conus level, procedural time for MRI, and radiology report. The typical rapid MRI has four sequences utilizing single-shot technique (scout, sagittal T2, axial T2, and axial T1) that typically take less than 1 min each of acquisition time, with non-single-shot sequences added periodically in cooperative patients. To include time for patient positioning, pre-scan shimming, procedural incidentals, and other patient-specific variations, MRI procedure length was recorded as documented in the electronic medical record. RESULTS: N = 100 patients had documentation of an MRI for pre-operative imaging. Seventy-nine of these had a rapid MRI, and 21 required a full MRI with anesthesia for their treatment plan. Mean total procedure time for rapid MRI was 21.5 min (median 17). Mean procedure time for MRI under general anesthesia was 91.2 min (median 94). Of patients with rapid MRI imaging, 2/79 had an ambiguous conus level (1 from motion artifact, 1 from spinal hardware) vs 1/21 with a full MRI under anesthesia (due to spinal hardware). CONCLUSION: Rapid spinal MRI without sedation can be used for conus localization in a pediatric population. This may be routinely used as pre-operative imaging for a single-level approach to selective dorsal rhizotomy, without sedation or intubation procedures.
RESUMO
Background: Weight loss response to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is variable and predicting the effectiveness of surgery is challenging and elusive. The aim of our study was to assess and quantify the association between eating control and weight loss outcomes and identify the control of eating (CoE) attributes during the early postoperative period that might predict good vs. poor response to SG at one year. Methods: A prospective longitudinal cohort study using the Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ) was designed as a series before and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-SG. Primary outcomes were changes in CoE attributes and percent of total weight loss (%TWL) 12-months post-surgery. Subjects were categorized based on %TWL as good (GR, ≥25 %) or poor responders (PR, <25 %). A receiver operating characteristic and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: We included 41 participants (80.5% females, 51.2% Hispanic, mean age 41.7±10.6, median baseline body mass index (BMI) 43.6 kg/m2 [range 35.2-66.3]) who completed the CoEQ at all four timepoints. The "Difficulty to control eating" score at 3 months revealed the highest area under the curve (AUC) (AUC 0.711; 95%CI 0.524-0.898; p=0.032). In a trade-off between a high Youden index and high sensitivity, the "Difficulty to control eating" score of 7 at 3 months was identified as the optimal cut-off for distinguishing between GRs and PRs. Score ≤7 at 3 months was strongly independently associated with a successful weight loss target of 25%TWL at one-year post-SG (Relative Risk 4.43; 95%CI 1.06-18.54; p=0.042). Conclusion: "Difficulty to control eating" score at 3 months post-SG is an independent early predictor of optimal response (achieving a successful TWL target of ≥25 % at one-year post-SG). Our results support the utility of this easy-to-administer validated tool for predicting the effectiveness of SG and may assist in identifying individuals with suboptimal response early and helping them with interventions to attain optimal weight loss targets.
