The Effect of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine Sedation on Norepinephrine Requirements in Septic Shock Patients: A Crossover Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Propofol-based sedation may increase hemodynamic instability by decreasing vascular tone and venous return. Incremental exogenous catecholamines doses may be required to counteract such effects, aggravating the deleterious effects of sympathetic overstimulation. α-2 adrenergic agonists have been reported to decrease norepinephrine requirements in experimental septic shock. The aim of the present study is to test the hypothesis that switching from sedation with propofol to the α-2 agonist dexmedetomidine may decrease norepinephrine doses in septic shock. DESIGN: Prospective open-label crossover study. SETTINGS: University hospital, ICU. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight septic shock patients requiring norepinephrine to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure and needing deep sedation with propofol and remifentanil to maintain a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score between -3 and -4. INTERVENTIONS: An initial set of measurements including hemodynamics, norepinephrine doses, and depth of sedation were obtained during sedation with propofol. Propofol was then replaced by dexmedetomidine and a second set of data was obtained after 4 hours of dexmedetomidine infusion. Sedation was switched back to propofol, and a final set of measurements was obtained after 8 hours. A Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score between -3 and -4 was maintained during the study period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Norepinephrine requirements decreased from 0.69 ± 0.72 µg/kg/min before dexmedetomidine to 0.30 ± 0.25 µg/kg/min 4 hours after dexmedetomidine infusion, increasing again to 0.42 ± 0.36 µg/kg/min while on propofol 8 hours after stopping dexmedetomidine (p < 0.005). Dexmedetomidine dosage was 0.7 ± 0.2 µg/kg/hr. Before and after dexmedetomidine infusion, sedative doses remained unchanged (propofol 2.6 ± 1.2 vs 2.6 ± 1.2 mg/kg/hr; p = 0.23 and remifentanil 1.27 ± 0.17 vs 1.27 ± 0.16 µg/kg/hr; p = 0.52, respectively). Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale was -4 (-4 to -3) before, -4 (-4 to -3) during, and -4 (-4 to -4) after dexmedetomidine (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: For a comparable level of sedation, switching from propofol to dexmedetomidine resulted in a reduction of catecholamine requirements in septic shock patients.

Effects of levosimendan on mitochondrial function in patients with septic shock: a randomized trial.

Mitochondrial dysfunction is key feature of septic shock and contributes to the development of sepsis related organ dysfunction. It is characterized by a variable reduction of the respiratory chain (RC) activities, altered mitochondrial morphology and reactive oxygen species production. Recent data have reported the efficacy of levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer, in improving heart performance and organ perfusion in critically ill patients. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that Levosimendan has antioxidant properties. Nevertheless, the effects of levosimendan on mitochondrial function are not fully elucidated. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of levosimendan on mitochondria performance. Five mitochondrial parameters were screened: the redox status; the amount of scavenging enzymes; the activities of the RC complexes; the mitochondrial content; the steady state levels of the RC subunits; the mitochondrial biogenesis. Our results show that patients treated with levosimendan had a significant reduction of glutathionylated proteins and an increase in the amount of the antioxidant enzyme MnSOD, underlining its antioxidant properties. The activities of the RC complexes I, II and III were unchanged in the mitochondria of patients treated with levosimendan compared to controls whereas the mitochondrial content was significantly higher in levosimendan vs. control patients. Finally, evaluation of mitochondrial biogenesis did not show any significant difference in the two groups, although an overall increase in the amount of the RC subunits was observed in the levosimendan group. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that in septic shock patients, Levosimendan exerts antioxidant action by increasing antioxidant defense and lowering oxidative damage.

Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: ß-Blocker therapy may control heart rate and attenuate the deleterious effects of ß-adrenergic receptor stimulation in septic shock. However, ß-Blockers are not traditionally used for this condition and may worsen cardiovascular decompensation related through negative inotropic and hypotensive effects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the short-acting ß-blocker esmolol in patients with severe septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Open-label, randomized phase 2 study, conducted in a university hospital intensive care unit (ICU) between November 2010 and July 2012, involving patients in septic shock with a heart rate of 95/min or higher requiring high-dose norepinephrine to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg or higher. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly assigned 77 patients to receive a continuous infusion of esmolol titrated to maintain heart rate between 80/min and 94/min for their ICU stay and 77 patients to standard treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Our primary outcome was a reduction in heart rate below the predefined threshold of 95/min and to maintain heart rate between 80/min and 94/min by esmolol treatment over a 96-hour period. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic and organ function measures; norepinephrine dosages at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours; and adverse events and mortality occurring within 28 days after randomization. RESULTS: Targeted heart rates were achieved in all patients in the esmolol group compared with those in the control group. The median AUC for heart rate during the first 96 hours was -28/min (IQR, -37 to -21) for the esmolol group vs -6/min (95% CI, -14 to 0) for the control group with a mean reduction of 18/min (P < .001). For stroke volume index, the median AUC for esmolol was 4 mL/m2 (IQR, -1 to 10) vs 1 mL/m2 for the control group (IQR, -3 to 5; P = .02), whereas the left ventricular stroke work index for esmolol was 3 mL/m2 (IQR, 0 to 8) vs 1 mL/m2 for the control group (IQR, -2 to 5; P = .03). For arterial lactatemia, median AUC for esmolol was -0.1 mmol/L (IQR, -0.6 to 0.2) vs 0.1 mmol/L for the control group (IQR, -0.3 for 0.6; P = .007); for norepinephrine, -0.11 µg/kg/min (IQR, -0.46 to 0.02) for the esmolol group vs -0.01 µg/kg/min (IQR, -0.2 to 0.44) for the control group (P = .003). Fluid requirements were reduced in the esmolol group: median AUC was 3975 mL/24 h (IQR, 3663 to 4200) vs 4425 mL/24 h(IQR, 4038 to 4775) for the control group (P < .001). We found no clinically relevant differences between groups in other cardiopulmonary variables nor in rescue therapy requirements. Twenty-eight day mortality was 49.4% in the esmolol group vs 80.5% in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.59; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For patients in septic shock, open-label use of esmolol vs standard care was associated with reductions in heart rates to achieve target levels, without increased adverse events. The observed improvement in mortality and other secondary clinical outcomes warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01231698.

Microvascular effects of heart rate control with esmolol in patients with septic shock: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: ß-blocker therapy may control heart rate and attenuate the deleterious effects of ß-stimulating catecholamines in septic shock. However, their negative chronotropy and inotropy may potentially lead to an inappropriately low cardiac output, with a subsequent compromise of microvascular blood flow. The purpose of the present pilot study was to investigate the effects of reducing heart rate to less than 95 beats per minute in patients with septic shock using the ß-1 adrenoceptor blocker, esmolol, with specific focus on systemic hemodynamics and the microcirculation. DESIGN: Prospective, observational clinical study. SETTING: Multidisciplinary ICU at a university hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After 24 hours of initial hemodynamic optimization, 25 septic shock patients with a heart rate greater than or equal to 95 beats per minute and requiring norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure greater than or equal to 65 mm Hg received a titrated esmolol infusion to maintain heart rate less than 95 beats per minute. Sublingual microcirculatory blood flow was assessed by sidestream dark-field imaging. All measurements, including data from right heart catheterization and norepinephrine requirements, were obtained at baseline and 24 hours after esmolol administration. Heart rates targeted between 80 and 94 beats per minute were achieved in all patients. Whereas cardiac index decreased (4.0 [3.5; 5.3] vs 3.1 [2.6; 3.9] L/min/m; p<0.001), stroke volume remained unchanged (34 [37; 47] vs 40 [31; 46] mL/beat/m; p=0.32). Microcirculatory blood flow in small vessels increased (2.8 [2.6; 3.0] vs 3.0 [3.0; 3.0]; p=0.002), while the heterogeneity index decreased (median 0.06 [interquartile range 0; 0.21] vs 0 [0; 0]; p=0.002). PaO2 and pH increased while PaCO2 decreased (all p<0.05). Of note, norepinephrine requirements were significantly reduced by selective ß-1 blocker therapy (0.53 [0.29; 0.96] vs 0.41 [0.22; 0.79] µg/kg/min; p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that heart rate control by a titrated esmolol infusion in septic shock patients was associated with maintenance of stroke volume, preserved microvascular blood flow, and a reduction in norepinephrine requirements.

Effects of vasopressinergic receptor agonists on sublingual microcirculation in norepinephrine-dependent septic shock.

INTRODUCTION: The present study was designed to determine the effects of continuously infused norepinephrine (NE) plus (1) terlipressin (TP) or (2) arginine vasopressin (AVP) or (3) placebo on sublingual microcirculation in septic shock patients. The primary study end point was a difference of ≥ 20% in the microvascular flow index of small vessels among groups. METHODS: The design of the study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. NE was titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 65 and 75 mmHg after establishment of normovolemia in 60 septic shock patients. Thereafter patients (n = 20 per group) were randomized to receive continuous infusions of either TP (1 µg/kg/hour), AVP (0.04 U/minute) or placebo (isotonic saline). In all groups, open-label NE was adjusted to maintain MAP within threshold values if needed. The sublingual microcirculatory blood flow of small vessels was assessed by sidestream dark-field imaging. All measurements, including data from right heart catheterization and norepinephrine requirements, were obtained at baseline and 6 hours after randomization. RESULTS: TP and AVP decreased NE requirements at the end of the 6-hour study period. The data are medians (25th and 75th interquartile ranges (IQRs)): 0.57 µg/kg/minute (0.29 to 1.04) vs. 0.16 µg/kg/minute (0.03 to 0.37) for TP and 0.40 µg/kg/minute (0.20 to 1.05) vs. 0.23 µg/kg/minute (0.03 to 0.77) for AVP, with statistical significance of P < 0.05 vs. baseline and vs. placebo. There were no differences in sublingual microcirculatory variables, systemic hemodynamics, oxygen transport and acid-base homeostasis among the three study groups during the entire observation period. The proportions of perfused vessels increased in relation to baseline within all study groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. The specific data were as follows (median (IQR)): 9.7% (2.6 to 19.8) for TP, 8.9% (0.0 to 17.8) for AVP, and 6.9% (3.5 to 10.1) for placebo (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for each comparison), as well as perfused vessel density 18.6% (8.6 to 36.9) for TP, 20.2% (-3.0 to 37.2) for AVP, and 11.4% (-3.0 to 19.4) for placebo (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that to achieve a MAP of 65 to 75 mmHg in septic patients treated with NE, the addition of continuously infused low-dose TP or AVP does not affect sublingual microcirculatory blood flow. In addition, our results suggest that microcirculatory flow abnormalities are mainly related to other factors (for example, volume status, timing, hemodynamics and progression of the disease) rather than to the vasopressor per se. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00995839.

Short-term effects of terlipressin bolus infusion on sublingual microcirculatory blood flow during septic shock.

PURPOSE: Terlipressin bolus infusion may contribute to overshooting increases in systemic vascular resistance with concomitant reductions in systemic blood flow and oxygen delivery. Whether these effects negatively impact on microcirculatory perfusion is still not known. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to elucidate the effects of a single terlipressin bolus dose of 0.5 mg on microcirculatory perfusion in patients with catecholamine-dependent septic shock. METHODS: This prospective clinical cohort study was performed in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit at a university hospital. We enrolled 20 patients suffering from catecholamine-dependent septic shock. After restoring normovolaemia, norepinephrine (NE) was titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 65 and 75 mmHg. Thereafter, all patients received a bolus infusion of 0.5 mg terlipressin, and NE was adjusted to maintain MAP between the threshold values. Sublingual microcirculatory blood flow of small vessels was assessed by sidestream dark-field imaging. All measurements, including data from right heart catheterization and NE requirements, were obtained at baseline and 6 h after terlipressin administration. RESULTS: Terlipressin stabilized haemodynamics and, at the same time, decreased NE requirements (0.42 ± 0.67 vs. 0.74 ± 0.73 µg/kg per minute, p<0.05). Whereas the pH and arterial lactate concentrations remained unchanged, microcirculatory flow index of small vessels had increased at the end of the 6-h study period (2.6 ± 0.6 vs. 2.0 ± 0.5 units, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In fluid-resuscitated patients with septic shock (with a MAP between 65 and 75 mmHg), a bolus infusion of 0.5 mg terlipressin was effective in reducing NE requirements without worsening microcirculatory blood flow. Randomized clinical trials are now warranted to verify these preliminary results.

Levosimendan for resuscitating the microcirculation in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate microcirculatory blood flow in patients with septic shock treated with levosimendan as compared to an active comparator drug (i.e. dobutamine). The primary end point was a difference of ≥ 20% in the microvascular flow index of small vessels (MFIs) among groups. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial and performed in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit. After achieving normovolemia and a mean arterial pressure of at least 65 mmHg, 40 septic shock patients were randomized to receive either levosimendan 0.2 µg·kg(-1)·min(-1) (n = 20) or an active comparator (dobutamine 5 µg·kg(-1)·min(-1); control; n = 20) for 24 hours. Sublingual microcirculatory blood flow of small and medium vessels was assessed by sidestream dark-field imaging. Microcirculatory variables and data from right heart catheterization were obtained at baseline and 24 hours after randomization. Baseline and demographic data were compared by means of Mann-Whitney rank sum test or chi-square test, as appropriate. Microvascular and hemodynamic variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. RESULTS: Microcirculatory flow indices of small and medium vessels increased over time and were significantly higher in the levosimendan group as compared to the control group (24 hrs: MFIm 3.0 (3.0; 3.0) vs. 2.9 (2.8; 3.0); P = .02; MFIs 2.9 (2.9; 3.0) vs. 2.7 (2.3; 2.8); P < .001). The relative increase of perfused vessel density vs. baseline was significantly higher in the levosimendan group than in the control group (dMFIm 10 (3; 23)% vs. 0 (-1; 9)%; P = .007; dMFIs 47 (26; 83)% vs. 10 (-3; 27); P < .001). In addition, the heterogeneity index decreased only in the levosimendan group (dHI -93 (-100; -84)% vs. 0 (-78; 57)%; P < .001). There was no statistically significant correlation between systemic and microcirculatory flow variables within each group (each P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a standard dose of 5 µg·kg(-1)·min(-1) of dobutamine, levosimendan at 0.2 µg·kg(-1)·min(-1) improved sublingual microcirculatory blood flow in patients with septic shock, as reflected by changes in microcirculatory flow indices of small and medium vessels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00800306.

Continuous terlipressin versus vasopressin infusion in septic shock (TERLIVAP): a randomized, controlled pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Recent clinical data suggest that early administration of vasopressin analogues may be advantageous compared to a last resort therapy. However, it is still unknown whether vasopressin and terlipressin are equally effective for hemodynamic support in septic shock. The aim of the present prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial study was, therefore, to compare the impact of continuous infusions of either vasopressin or terlipressin, when given as first-line therapy in septic shock patients, on open-label norepinephrine requirements. METHODS: We enrolled septic shock patients (n = 45) with a mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg despite adequate volume resuscitation. Patients were randomized to receive continuous infusions of either terlipressin (1.3 microg.kg-1.h-1), vasopressin (.03 U.min-1) or norepinephrine (15 microg.min-1; n = 15 per group). In all groups, open-label norepinephrine was added to achieve a mean arterial pressure between 65 and 75 mmHg, if necessary. Data from right heart and thermo-dye dilution catheterization, gastric tonometry, as well as laboratory variables of organ function were obtained at baseline, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours after randomization. Differences within and between groups were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements with group and time as factors. Time-independent variables were compared with one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: There were no differences among groups in terms of systemic and regional hemodynamics. Compared with infusion of .03 U of vasopressin or 15 microg.min-1 of norepinephrine, 1.3 microg.kg-1.h-1 of terlipressin allowed a marked reduction in catecholamine requirements (0.8 +/- 1.3 and 1.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 0.2 +/- 0.4 microg.kg-1.min-1 at 48 hours; each P < 0.05) and was associated with less rebound hypotension (P < 0.05). At the end of the 48-hour intervention period, bilirubin concentrations were higher in the vasopressin and norepinephrine groups as compared with the terlipressin group (2.3 +/- 2.8 and 2.8 +/- 2.5 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.3 mg.dL-1; each P < 0.05). A time-dependent decrease in platelet count was only observed in the terlipressin group (P < 0.001 48 hours vs. BL). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides evidence that continuous infusion of low-dose terlipressin--when given as first-line vasopressor agent in septic shock--is effective in reversing sepsis-induced arterial hypotension and in reducing norepinephrine requirements.

Phenylephrine versus norepinephrine for initial hemodynamic support of patients with septic shock: a randomized, controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Previous findings suggest that a delayed administration of phenylephrine replacing norepinephrine in septic shock patients causes a more pronounced hepatosplanchnic vasoconstriction as compared with norepinephrine. Nevertheless, a direct comparison between the two study drugs has not yet been performed. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to investigate the effects of a first-line therapy with either phenylephrine or norepinephrine on systemic and regional hemodynamics in patients with septic shock. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit in a university hospital. We enrolled septic shock patients (n = 32) with a mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg despite adequate volume resuscitation. Patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either norepinephrine or phenylephrine infusion (n = 16 each) titrated to achieve a mean arterial pressure between 65 and 75 mmHg. Data from right heart catheterization, a thermodye dilution catheter, gastric tonometry, acid-base homeostasis, as well as creatinine clearance and cardiac troponin were obtained at baseline and after 12 hours. Differences within and between groups were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance for repeated measurements with group and time as factors. Time-independent variables were compared with one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: No differences were found in any of the investigated parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests there are no differences in terms of cardiopulmonary performance, global oxygen transport, and regional hemodynamics when phenylephrine was administered instead of norepinephrine in the initial hemodynamic support of septic shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00639015.

Glibenclamide dose response in patients with septic shock: effects on norepinephrine requirements, cardiopulmonary performance, and global oxygen transport.

Adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels are important regulators of arterial vascular smooth muscle tone and are implicated in the pathophysiology of catecholamine tachyphylaxis in septic shock. The present study was designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, clinical pilot study to determine whether different doses of glibenclamide have any effects on norepinephrine requirements, cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, and global oxygen transport in patients with septic shock. We enrolled 30 patients with septic shock requiring invasive hemodynamic monitoring and norepinephrine infusion of 0.5 microg.kg-1.min-1 or greater to maintain MAP between 65 and 75 mmHg. In addition to standard therapy, patients were randomized to receive either 10, 20, or 30 mg of enteral glibenclamide. Systemic hemodynamics, global oxygen transport including arterial lactate concentrations, gas exchange, plasma glucose concentrations, and electrolytes were determined at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 h after administration of the study drug. Glibenclamide decreased plasma glucose concentrations in a dose-dependent manner but failed to reduce norepinephrine requirements. None of the doses had any effects on cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, global oxygen transport, gas exchange, or electrolytes. These data suggest that oral glibenclamide in doses from 10 to 30 mg fails to counteract arterial hypotension and thus to reduce norepinephrine requirements in catecholamine-dependent human septic shock.

Effects of levosimendan on right ventricular afterload in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is frequently associated with increased pulmonary vascular resistance and thus with systolic load of the right ventricle. We hypothesized that levosimendan, a new calcium sensitizer with potential pulmonary vasodilator properties, improves hemodynamics by unloading the right ventricle in patients with ARDS. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study. SETTING: Twenty-two-bed multidisciplinary intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-five patients with ARDS in association with septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive a 24-hr infusion of either levosimendan 0.2 microg/kg/min (n = 18) or placebo (n = 17). Data from right heart catheterization, cardiac magnetic resonance, arterial and mixed venous oxygen tensions and saturations, and carbon dioxide tensions were obtained before and 24 hrs after drug infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At a mean arterial pressure between 70 and 80 mm Hg (sustained with norepinephrine infusion), levosimendan increased cardiac index (from 3.8 +/- 1.1 to 4.2 +/- 1.0 L/min/m) and decreased mean pulmonary artery pressure (from 29 +/- 3 to 25 +/- 3 mm Hg) and pulmonary vascular resistance index (from 290 +/- 77 to 213 +/- 50 dynes/s/cm(5)/m(2); each p < .05). Levosimendan also decreased right ventricular end-systolic volume and increased right ventricular ejection fraction (p < .05). In addition, levosimendan increased mixed venous oxygen saturation (from 63 +/- 8 to 70 +/- 8%; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that levosimendan improves right ventricular performance through pulmonary vasodilator effects in septic patients with ARDS. A large multiple-center trial is needed to investigate whether levosimendan is able to improve the overall prognosis of patients with sepsis and ARDS.

Prophylactic fenoldopam for renal protection in sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: Acute renal failure is common in septic patients. Fenoldopam, a dopamine-1 receptor agonist, increases renal blood flow and may, therefore, reduce the risk of acute renal failure in such patients. Accordingly, we sought to determine the safety and efficacy of fenoldopam for the prevention of acute renal failure in septic patients. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Three multidisciplinary intensive care units at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Three hundred septic patients with baseline serum creatinine concentrations <150 micromol/L. INTERVENTIONS: We randomized patients to a continuous infusion of either fenoldopam (n = 150) at 0.09 microg x kg x min or placebo (n = 150) while in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of acute renal failure, defined as a serum creatinine concentration increase to >150 micromol/L, during study drug infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of acute renal failure was significantly lower in the fenoldopam group compared with the control group (29 vs. 51 patients; p = .006). The odds ratio of developing acute renal failure for patients treated with fenoldopam was estimated to be 0.47 (p = .005). The difference in the incidence of severe acute renal failure (creatinine >300 mumol/L), however, failed to achieve statistical significance (10 vs. 21; p = .056). The length of intensive care unit stay in surviving patients was significantly lower in the fenoldopam group compared with the control group (10.64 +/- 9.3 vs. 13.4 +/- 14.0; p < .001). There were no complications of fenoldopam infusion. A direct effect of treatment on the probability of death, beyond its effect on acute renal failure, was not significant (odds ratio = 0.68, p = .1). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, low-dose fenoldopam resulted in a smaller increase in serum creatinine in septic patients. The clinical significance of this finding is uncertain. A large multiple-center trial is now needed to confirm these findings.

Effects of levosimendan on systemic and regional hemodynamics in septic myocardial depression.

OBJECTIVE: Calcium desensitization plays an important part in the pathophysiology of septic myocardial depression. We postulated that levosimendan, a new calcium sensitizer, would be beneficial in sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, controlled study in two university hospital intensive care units. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight patients with persisting left ventricular dysfunction related to septic shock after 48 h of conventional treatment including dobutamine (5 microg/kg per minute). INTERVENTIONS: After 48 h of conventional treatment patients were randomized to receive a 24-h infusion of either levosimendan (0.2 microg/kg per minute, n=15) or dobutamine (5 microg/kg per minute, n=13). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Data from right heart catheterization, echocardiography, gastric tonometry, laser-Doppler flowmetry, and lactate concentrations and creatinine clearance were obtained before and after the 24-h drug infusion. Dobutamine did not change systemic or regional hemodynamic variables. By contrast, at the same mean arterial pressure levosimendan decreased pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and increased cardiac index. Levosimendan decreased left ventricular end-diastolic volume and increased left ventricular ejection fraction. Levosimendan increased gastric mucosal flow, creatinine clearance, and urinary output while it decreased lactate concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that levosimendan improves systemic hemodynamics and regional perfusion in patients with septic cardiac dysfunction under conditions where administration of 5 microg/kg dobutamine per minute is no longer efficacious. Accordingly, our results suggest that levosimendan can be an alternative to the strategy of increasing the dose of dobutamine under such conditions.

Terlipressin versus norepinephrine to counteract anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors: effects on systemic and regional hemodynamics.

BACKGROUND: Terlipressin has been suggested as the ideal drug to treat anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients under long-term renin-angiotensin system inhibitor treatment for arterial hypertension. The authors compared the effects of terlipressin and norepinephrine on systemic hemodynamic parameters and gastric mucosal perfusion using a laser Doppler flowmetry technique in patients treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors who experienced hypotension at induction of anesthesia. METHODS: Thirty-two patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia and treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors had hypotension after induction of general anesthesia. They were randomized to receive 1 mg of terlipressin (n = 16) or norepinephrine infusion (n = 16) to counteract anesthesia-induced hypotension. A laser Doppler probe was introduced into the gastric lumen. All measurements were performed just before surgery, during hypotension, at 30 min, and at 4 h. RESULTS: Terlipressin produced an increase in mean arterial pressure and a decrease in gastric mucosal perfusion detected by laser Doppler flowmetry (P < 0.05) over 30 min that were sustained for 4 h. During the infusion, norepinephrine produced an increase in mean arterial pressure and in gastric mucosal perfusion detected by laser Doppler flowmetry (P < 0.05). If compared to norepinephrine, terlipressin reduced oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption (P < 0.05) and increased arterial lactate concentrations (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed the efficacy of terlipressin in the treatment of hypotension episodes in anesthetized patients chronically treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor antagonists. However, the negative effects on gastric mucosal perfusion and the risk of iatrogenic oxygen supply dependency of terlipressin need to be taken into account.

Effects of short-term fenoldopam infusion on gastric mucosal blood flow in septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate splanchnic perfusion in septic shock is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. As result of splanchnic ischemia, mucosal permeability increases. Considering the implication of improved mucosal perfusion in terms of maintenance of mucosal barrier integrity, dopamine-1 receptor stimulation could be helpful in septic shock. The goal of the current study was to determine the effects of fenoldopam on systemic hemodynamic parameters and gastric mucosal perfusion in patients with septic shock. Furthermore, the authors tested the hypothesis that the addition of fenoldopam (0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) to a combination of norepinephrine and dobutamine (5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) may improve gastric mucosal perfusion in septic shock. METHODS: Patients with septic shock were randomized to a double-blind 2-h infusion of fenoldopam (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20). Each group received dobutamine (5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), and the dosage of norepinephrine was adjusted to achieve a mean arterial pressure between 70 and 80 mmHg. A laser-Doppler probe and tonometer were introduced into the gastric lumen. RESULTS: A significant increase in gastric mucosal perfusion, detected by laser-Doppler flowmetry, was observed in the group treated with fenoldopam (P < 0.05). In addition, this increase in microcirculatory flow occurred despite the fact that systemic flow remained unchanged. Differences in gastroarterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide values were not statistically significant in the fenoldopam and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that, for the same mean arterial pressure, short-term fenoldopam infusion increased gastric mucosal perfusion in patients with septic shock.

Effects of terlipressin on systemic and regional haemodynamics in catecholamine-treated hyperkinetic septic shock.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of an intravenous bolus dose of a vasopressin analogue, terlipressin (1 mg), on systemic haemodynamic parameters and gastric mucosal perfusion (GMP) in patients with catecholamine-treated septic shock using a gastric tonometry and laser-Doppler flowmetry technique. DESIGN: Prospective open label study. SETTINGS: Two multidisciplinary intensive care units. PATIENTS: Fifteen patients with norepinephrine-treated septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Every patient with mean arterial pressure between 50 and 55 mmHg treated with high dose norepinephrine received an intravenous bolus dose of terlipressin as last resort therapy. A laser-Doppler probe and tonometer were introduced into the gastric lumen. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Terlipressin produced a decrease in cardiac output ( p<0.05), a progressive increase in mean arterial pressure ( p<0.05) and in GMP, detected by laser-Doppler flowmetry ( p<0.05) over 30 min and sustained for at least 24 h. The ratio of GMP to systemic oxygen delivery increased after terlipressin bolus dose ( p<0.05). The gradient between gastric mucosal and arterial PCO(2) tended to be lower after terlipressin, and the difference was statistically significant ( p<0.05) after 8 h. Terlipressin administration significantly increased ( p<0.05) urine output compared to baseline and higher values were found at each set of measurement. The terlipressin-induced increase in urine output was associated with a significantly increased creatinine clearance ( p<0.05). Reduction of the high-dose norepinephrine was observed in all patients ( p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that, in patients with norepinephrine-treated septic shock, terlipressin increased GMP, urine output and creatinine clearance by an increase in mean arterial pressure.

Monitoring renal oxygen supply in critically-ill patients using urinary oxygen tension.

UNLABELLED: Critically-ill patients are at risk of developing renal disorders as a consequence of systemic hypoperfusion. Ischemic acute tubular necrosis and resulting acute renal failure are caused by hypotension or therapeutic management. In this study, we tested the change of O(2) availability induced by fenoldopam mesylate using the continuous measurement of urinary oxygen tension (PuO(2)), a relatively noninvasive technique that could provide potentially important real-time data regarding renal oxygenation in intensive care unit patients. Fenoldopam was administered at different doses (0.03, 0.06, and 0.09 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) to 50 stable critically-ill patients. Urine output was collected every hour to assess volume and urinary electrolytes. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, arterial oxygen delivery index, and oxygen consumption index were analyzed after fenoldopam dose modifications and at infusion end. PaO(2) and PuO(2) continuous measurements were obtained through two sensors inserted in the radial artery and in the bladder. After a fenoldopam dose increase, PuO(2) significantly increased (P < 0.05), whereas PaO(2) remained unchanged. During the study, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac output, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, arterial oxygen delivery index, and oxygen consumption remained unchanged. Dose-dependent PuO(2) increases, unrelated to indexes of systemic perfusion and cardiac function, demonstrate that fenoldopam affects the balance between renal oxygen supply and demand in stable critically-ill patients. IMPLICATIONS: Acute renal failure in critically-ill patients is associated with frequent mortality. Prolonged renal hypoperfusion cannot be detected by current systemic hemodynamic indexes. Using continuous measurement of urinary oxygen tension, which could indirectly provide real-time data regarding renal oxygenation, our study showed that fenoldopam increases the ratio between oxygen supply and demand.