Psychological impacts of COVID-19 pandemic in cancer patients on active treatment.

Introduction: Although cancer patients have a high risk of exposing COVID-19 and developing severe complications, they have to receive active treatment. We aimed to determine the psychological conditions of cancer patients and shed light on the establishment of early psychological intervention and intervention policies by making specific recommendations. Method: We consecutively evaluated 385 cancer patients under treatment. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, depression, anxiety, stress, and associated sociodemographic/clinical characteristics were investigated. In addition, we applied depression-anxiety-stress-scale-21 (DASS-21) for the mental states of patients and Impact of Event-Scale-Revised (IES-R) for the psychological effects of Covid-19. Results: The mean age was 58 (18-88). 47.2% were psychologically distressful per DASS-21, and 39.3% were traumatic per IES-R scores. 71.9% stated the risk of getting COVID-19 was high since they had cancer, and 82% stated serious complications would develop if they had COVID-19 infection. Patients diagnosed for more than one year were more stressed, anxious, and depressive (p-value = 0.001,0.003,0.049, respectively). Singles were more stressed, depressed, and traumatized than couples (p-value = 0.001, 0.011, 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a significant correlation with being under psychiatric treatment before the pandemic was found for depression (OR: 3.743, 95 %CI: 1.790-7.827) anxiety (OR: 3.776-95 %CI: 1.945-7.332) and stress levels (OR: 4.129, 95 %CI: 1.728-9.866). Having relatives who died or received treatment for COVID-19(OR: 0.515,0.296-0.895) and being unmarried (OR: 2.445-95% CI: 1.260-4.747) predicts PTSD development. Conclusions: When the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are manifesting strongly, cancer patients' anxiety and exposure levels are high. It is of great importance that clinicians understand needs, recognize psychological distress, and direct them to relevant departments for supportive care.

Effect of IVF failure on quality of life and emotional status in infertile couples.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a previous IVF failure on the quality of life and emotional distress, in couples undergoing IVF treatment. Experiencing IVF failure might cause differences on the anxiety-depression and quality of life scores of the couples, compared to the ones who were undergoing IVF treatment for the first time. STUDY DESIGN: This study included 64 couples who had previously experienced at least one IVF failure (Group 1) and 56 couples without history of IVF failure (Group 2) in a private Assisted Reproductive Center, Istanbul, Turkey. A sociodemographic data form, the FertiQoL International and Hospital Anxiety (HAD-A) and Depression scale (HAD-D) for evaluating the status of distress, were administered for the study. RESULT(S): FertiQoL scores were compared between the groups, the environment scale of the quality of life in treatment section was found to be significantly higher in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (p=0.009). The HAD-A and HAD-D scores did not differ significantly between the groups. Group-variables were investigated using multilevel analysis, the infertility duration and income level were found to have an effect on the subscales of quality of life (p=0.009 and p=0.001 respectively) in Group 2. Depression scores were higher in couples with infertility duration of below five years in Group 1 and Group 2 compared to couples with infertility duration of five years or above (MANOVA analysis). The level of education was found to affect the scores of HAD-D in Group 2, but not in Group 1 (p=0.011). The score of HAD-D was significantly affected by the family type only in Group 2 (p=0.009); the depression score of the couples living with a nuclear family was found to be higher compared with the couples living in a traditional family (p=0.021). CONCLUSION(S): Fertility-specific quality of life scores reveals better results regarding the orientation to the treatment environment in the couples with a previous IVF failure, compared to first IVF cycle couples. Treatment failure does not elevate the level of anxiety, while the effect on depression scores changes according to duration of infertility.

Dissociation in bipolar disorder: Relationships between clinical variables and childhood trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The dissociative experiences of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) differ from those of patients with other psychiatric disorders with regard to certain features. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the clinical variables of BD and childhood trauma using the factor structure, psychometric features, and potential subdimensions of the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES). METHOD: This study included 200 BD patients who were in a remission period and 50 healthy volunteers. The BD patients were recruited from two psychiatry clinic departments in Turkey. The sociodemographic data of the two groups and their scores on the DES and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ)-28 were compared. RESULTS: The overall DES scores and the scores for each DES item accurately and reliably measured dissociation in the BD patients (item-total correlation r scores: >0.20, Cronbach's alpha: 0.95), and a factor analysis revealed two subdimensions of the DES for BD: identity confusion/alteration (SubDES-1) and amnesia and depersonalization/derealization (SubDES-2). Although age at onset of BD was significantly correlated with both subdimensions, illness duration was significantly correlated only with the SubDES-2. Of all the subjects, 19.5% (39/200 patients) were identified as having dissociative experiences by the DES-Taxon (DES-T), and subjects in this subscale (DES-T-positive) had significantly higher total scores on the CTQ-28 as well as higher scores on each subgroup of this scale. The highest CTQ-28 subgroup score was emotional neglect, which was followed by emotional abuse and physical neglect and then sexual abuse and physical abuse. There was a significant correlation between total scores on the CTQ-28 and SubDES-2 but none of the CTQ-28 subscale scores was significantly correlated with either SubDES-1 or SubDES-2. CONCLUSION: The DES sufficiently and reliably identified the experience of dissociative symptoms on the part of BD patients, and a factor analysis revealed two subdimensions of BD on this scale. In particular, DES-T-positive subjects experienced a greater amount of childhood trauma and, as a result, had an earlier age at onset of BD. Additionally, SubDES-2, which was associated with amnesia and depersonalization/derealization, was closely related to illness duration.