Disparity in access to bariatric surgery among African-American men.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in safety and effectiveness in surgical management of extreme obesity, men and racial minorities are less likely to receive metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) compared to other patient groups. This study examines the racial and gender disparities in access to MBS to understand the mechanism that drives these problems and to propose strategies for closing the disparity gap. METHODS: Using 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, we estimated the proportion of individuals, by race and gender, who were eligible for MBS based on Body Mass Index (BMI) and comorbidity profile. We analyzed the 2015 MBS Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File to examine differences in patient characteristics, comorbidities, and postsurgical outcomes among African-American (AA) and White men. Predictors of poor outcomes were identified using unconditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: AA men represented 11% of eligible patients but only 2.4% of actual MBS patients. Compared to White men, AA men were younger, had higher BMI, were more likely to have a history of hypertension, renal insufficiency, required dialysis, and had American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 or 5 (all P values < 0.01). After surgery, AA men were more likely to suffer from postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.52) and stayed in the hospital for more than 4 days (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.26-1.82) compared to White men. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being eligible for MBS based on both BMI and obesity-related comorbidities, AA men are significantly less likely to undergo MBS. Those AA men who receive surgery are significantly younger than White men but also experience greater comorbidities compared to White men and all women. Further longitudinal studies into patient-, system-, and provider-level barriers are necessary to understand and address these disparities.

Elder and caregiver solutions to improve medication adherence.

Medication mismanagement is a growing public health concern, especially among elders. Annually, it is a major contributor to emergency hospitalization and nursing home placement. Elders and their caregivers, as healthcare consumers and stakeholders in this issue, are uniquely qualified to inform strategies to improve medication adherence. We conducted a qualitative study to ascertain caregiver and elder perceptions of barriers to medication management and to identify community-derived solutions to improve medication management. Nine focus groups (N = 65, mean age = 71) were conducted with caregivers or elders from five communities. Participants were recruited by key informants utilizing snowball sampling methodology. The following themes were identified in the participant-recommended proposed solutions improving medication adherence: (i) use of personal systems to overcome barriers to medication adherence, (ii) various solutions to address cost concerns, (iii) the need for regular review of medications by doctors or pharmacists to eliminate unnecessary medications, (iv) desire for community-driven support systems, and (v) using medical advocates. Elders and caregivers recognized medication non-adherence as a community-wide issue and were eager to offer solutions they thought would work in their communities. These solutions can lend credibility to strategies currently being developed/utilized and offer innovative recommendations for future interventions.

Race and sex differences in cutaneous pain perception.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine race and sex differences in cutaneous pain perception. METHODS: Pain perception was measured using a suprathreshold evaluation of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness to a series of thermal stimuli in 27 whites (14 men and 13 women) and 24 African Americans (12 men and 12 women). Blood pressure, depressive symptoms, anxiety state levels, and negative mood were assessed before pain testing to examine whether they might account for any sex or race differences in pain perception that emerged. RESULTS: African Americans rated the stimuli as more unpleasant and showed a tendency to rate it as more intense than whites. Women showed a tendency to rate the stimuli as more unpleasant and more intense than men. In addition, systolic blood pressure was inversely related to pain intensity. After statistically adjusting for systolic blood pressure, sex differences in pain unpleasantness were reduced and sex differences in pain intensity were abolished; race differences were unaltered. CONCLUSIONS: These differences in pain perception may be associated with different pain mechanisms: in the ease of sex, differences in opioid activity and baroreceptor-regulated pain systems; in the case of race, unmeasured psychological characteristics are suggested by the larger differences in ratings of pain unpleasantness than pain intensity.