Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AJOB Empir Bioeth ; 8(4): 266-276, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29125425

RESUMO

Vast quantities of personal health information and private identifiable information are being created through mobile apps, wearable sensors, and social networks. While new strategies and tools for obtaining health data have expanded researchers' abilities to design and test personalized and adaptive health interventions, the deployment of pervasive sensing and computational techniques to gather research data is raising ethical challenges for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) charged with protecting research participants. To explore experiences with, and perceptions about, technology-enabled research, and identify solutions for promoting responsible conduct of this research we conducted focus groups with human research protection program and IRB affiliates. Our findings outline the need for increased collaboration across stakeholders in terms of: (1) shared and dynamic resources that improve awareness of technologies and decrease potential threats to participant privacy and data confidentiality, and (2) development of appropriate and dynamic standards through collaboration with stakeholders in the research ethics community.


Assuntos
Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Ética em Pesquisa , Mídias Sociais/ética , Tecnologia sem Fio/ética , Confidencialidade/ética , Confidencialidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Grupos Focais , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica/ética , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Registros de Saúde Pessoal/ética , Humanos , Privacidade , Sujeitos da Pesquisa , Mídias Sociais/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Tecnologia sem Fio/legislação & jurisprudência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...