Endometrial cancer: is surgical staging necessary?

Surgical staging has become the standard of care for the treatment of women with endometrial cancer. Recent scientific publications have confirmed the relative safety of this procedure when performed by subspecialty trained surgeons and have provided compelling evidence that the routine use of postoperative teletherapy is not cost effective, nor does it offer improved survival. New questions as to the safety and effectiveness of a laparoscopic staging approach have been answered in the affirmative. Although the extent of staging has not yet been defined, growing evidence suggests that preoperative studies and intraoperative clinical opinion cannot be consistently counted on to be predictive of postoperative histologic status. Therefore, all patients should be considered at risk and should undergo an operation in a clinical situation that offers the immediate availability of retroperitoneal staging or cytoreductive surgery if necessary.

Mandibular metastasis in a patient with endometrial cancer.

Gynecologic cancers metastatic to bone are a rare entity, and a metastasis to the mandible at initial presentation is even more infrequently seen. We present a case of a 71-year-old woman with stage IV endometrial cancer with a metastasis to the mandible, with no other sites of distal spread apparent. The endometrial tumor was a FIGO grade III adenocarcinoma. The pathologic evaluation of the mandibular lesion revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with focal squamous differentiation. She was treated with a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, radiation therapy to the mandible, and chemotherapy consisting of Taxol and carboplatin for six cycles. She had a complete response, but 10 months after the original diagnosis developed spinal cord compression and progressive disease in the pelvis. Patients in good clinical condition with a single bone metastasis should be treated aggressively, as survival can be extended.

Stage I corpus cancer: is teletherapy necessary?

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the perioperative morbidity after hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy as primary treatment of endometrial cancer and to analyze the recurrence and survival of patients classified as having surgical stage I disease who did not receive adjunctive teletherapy. STUDY DESIGN: Over a 10-year interval 444 patients underwent extensive surgical staging for corpus cancer. Perioperative events were recorded prospectively. Outcome events were updated after the last year of study. RESULTS: After patients with high-risk histologic types of cancer were excluded, 396 patients were evaluable. The risk of extrauterine disease, detected in 21.8% of patients, increased with increasing lack of tumor differentiation. The associated surgical morbidity, including blood loss (mean 336 ml), surgical site infection (3.5%), thromboembolic events (1.5%), and urinary injury (0.6%), and deaths (0.6%) did not differ from those in reports of women undergoing lesser operative procedures. Late complications, including lymphocyst (1.2%), leg edema (1.8%), and hernia (2.9%), were infrequent. Recurrence and survival analysis indicated a calculated 5-year survival of 97% of all patients with surgical stage I disease. There was a significant survival difference related to grade and stage for women in whom disease was confined to the uterus. Overall survival in patients with stage IA (100%) was significantly different (p < 0.0001) from that of patients with stage IB (97%) and stage IC (93%). All recurrences included a distal component. CONCLUSION: Extensive surgical staging including lymphadenectomy can be performed safely. Our results suggest that the risk of pelvic recurrence is not increased and the risk of survival is not compromised in those women not receiving adjunctive teletherapy.

Surgical staging endometrial cancer.

Nothing improves the subsequent care of a woman with endometrial cancer more than the accurate determination of the extent of her disease. A significant number of women whose malignancy is apparently confined to the uterus will have extrauterine disease after careful, complete surgical staging. The failure to detect and effectively treat unrecognized metastatic disease can have fatal consequences; the decision to prescribe potentially harmful therapy to women who do not have metastatic disease also has deleterious effects. Although the optimal surgical management of any patient must be individualized, careful and complete surgical staging at the time of hysterectomy offers the most complete data for future management.

The efficacy and safety of the cytobrush during pregnancy.

The safety and efficacy of abrasive cytology, using the cytobrush, were evaluated in 300 pregnant patients. When compared to conventional cytology obtained with a cotton-tipped applicator there was no difference in adverse pregnancy events. Smear adequacy (containing endocervical cells) was statistically (P less than 0.01) and clinically increased from 21 to 86%. The use of abrasive cervical cytology was associated with a twofold increase in the incidence of abnormal smears.

Surgical staging of uterine cancer: an analysis of perioperative morbidity.

Surgical staging documented extrauterine disease in 27.9% of 168 patients with apparent early-clinical-stage uterine cancer. An analysis of operative time (78 +/- 21 min), blood loss (332 +/- 160 cc), and surgical site infection risks (4.7%) indicated little additional risk of lymphadenectomy. The long-term risk of lymphocyst (1.3%) or lymphedema (0.7%) was small. The histologic information obtained from staging was utilized to rationally guide the need for adjunctive teletherapy. The overall risk of recurrence (median follow-up, 26 months) with surgical Stage I disease was 2.6%.

Continuous or interrupted fascial closure: a prospective evaluation of No. 1 Maxon suture in 402 gynecologic procedures.

During a 14-month period of using a long-term absorbable suture (No. 1 Maxon), 402 patients were entered into a prospective, randomized trial of fascial closure. Patients were randomized between a continuous closure (201 patients) and an interrupted en bloc (201 patients) technique. Each patient was subjected to a preoperative and intraoperative protocol for wound management. There were no acute wound failures. Wound infection rates and risk of hernia were not apparently affected by closure technique.