Usefulness of a single-parameter tool for the prediction of large vessel occlusion in acute stroke.

BACKGROUND: In acute stroke, large vessel occlusion (LVO) should be promptly identified to guide patient's transportation directly to comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In many cases, prehospital multi-parameter scores are used by trained emergency teams to identify patients with high probability of LVO. However, in several countries, the first aid organization without intervention of skilled staff precludes the on-site use of such scores. Here, we assessed the accuracy of LVO prediction using a single parameter (i.e. complete hemiplegia) obtained by bystander's telephone-based witnessing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational, single-center study included consecutive patients who underwent intravenous thrombolysis at the primary stroke center and/or were directly transferred to a CSC for MT, from January 1, 2015 to March 1, 2020. We defined two groups: patients with initial hemiplegia (no movement in one arm and leg and facial palsy) and patients without initial hemiplegia, on the basis of a bystander's witnessing. RESULTS: During the study time, 874 patients were included [mean age 73 years (SD 13.8), 56.7% men], 320 with initial hemiplegia and 554 without. The specificity of the hemiplegia criterion to predict LVO was 0.88, but its sensitivity was only 0.53. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the presence of hemiplegia as witnessed by a bystander can predict LVO with high specificity. This single criterion could be used for decision-making about direct transfer to CSC for MT when the absence of emergency skilled staff precludes the patient's on-site assessment, especially in regions distant from a CSC.

[Impact of mobile intensive care units on treating stroke within the 3-hour time window in a semi-rural area]. / Intérêt d'une médicalisation préhospitalière des accidents vasculaires cérébraux de moins de 3 heures en milieu semi-rural.

OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that calling emergency medical services ("15", French equivalent of 911 or 999 calls) and response by a mobile intensive care unit staffed by emergency physicians (MICU) reduces the time to treatment to within the 3-hour time window required for administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. METHODS: This study compared the time from symptom onset to admission (prehospital time), from admission to treatment (imaging and treatment delays, hospital time), and total time from symptom onset to treatment in an observational cohort of 53 consecutive patients, according to how they reached the hospital (Group 1: MICU and group 2: standard emergency ambulance dispatched by EMS center [2a] or direct admission [2b]). RESULTS: The study included 52 patients (1 was excluded because hospitalized at the time of the stroke): 27 (51.9%) in group 1, 16 (30.8%) in group 2a, and 9 (17.3%) in group 2b. Calling "15" shortened total home-to-needle time by 24 minutes (p=0.034). The mean total time was not significantly shorter in group 1 (152 versus 162 min; p=0.27) but MICUs were used for patients farther away (mean distance 25 versus 11 km; p=0.02). The average prehospital time was thus higher in group 1 (86 versus 69 min; p=0.044), but was compensated by a reduction in the average hospital time (66 versus 93 min; p=0.0001), due mainly to shorter waits for imaging (22 versus 45 min; p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Calling the emergency services number reduces mean total time. MICUs were associated with a longer prehospital time, mainly due to greater distances, but they facilitated in-hospital management.